Israeli bombs spread cancer in Gaza
Press TV – March 4, 2011
The number of cancer patients has been climbing in Gaza due to the use of depleted uranium by the Israeli military during its onslaught on the impoverished enclave two years ago, medical sources say.
After the war, cancer cases have reportedly increased by about 30 percent in Gaza, Press TV correspondent reported on Thursday.
“We have seen a sharp increase in blood cancer and other types of the diseases. Many patients come from the areas that were attacked by Israeli fighter jets using banned chemical weapons,” Oncologist Mohammed Atteya said.
Shifa hospital, Gaza’s major health provider, has witnessed a sharp rise recently in the number of cancer patients.
Doctors say that most cancer patients reside in areas that were heavily bombed during Israel’s onslaught on Gaza in the winter of 2008-2009.
The war left about 1,400 Palestinians dead and thousands injured; the majority of victims were civilians.
At the time, Norwegian doctors volunteering in Gaza hospitals said some victims had traces of depleted uranium in their bodies.
Environmental damage and pollution is another unfortunate byproduct of the war.
Post-war measurements suggest some areas in the enclave are 1,000 times more radioactive than natural levels, and cancer cases have begun to emerge on a daily basis.
“The number of cancer patients has gone up significantly. Israel used depleted, white phosphorous against the city. The city became a testing ground for all these banned weapons,” environmental expert Zekra Ajour.
A common denominator among cancer patients is that they lived in areas that were badly bombed.
The majority of high tech weapons today contain depleted uranium and/or other Heavy Metals.
The residue of a depleted uranium weapon can be spread by the wind, infecting residents in the immediate vicinity and contaminating the food chain.
According to medical and environmental experts, the Gaza strip’s environment and population will suffer the grave consequences of Israel’s use of internationally banned weapons during the war.
Share this:
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- More
- Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Related
March 4, 2011 - Posted by aletho | Environmentalism, Timeless or most popular, War Crimes
8 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Featured Video
Against the Wind – Doctors & Science Under Fire
For more videos go to the Aletho News – Video Category
or go to
Aletho News Archives – Video-Images
From the Archives
Why Germany Invaded Poland
By John Wear – Inconvenient History – 2019-01-15
Great Britain’s Blank Check to Poland
On March 21, 1939, while hosting French Prime Minister Édouard Daladier, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain discussed a joint front with France, Russia and Poland to act together against German aggression. France agreed at once, and the Russians agreed on the condition that both France and Poland sign first. However, Polish Foreign Minister Józef Beck vetoed the agreement on March 24, 1939.[1] Polish statesmen feared Russia more than they did Germany. Polish Marshal Edward Śmigły-Rydz told the French ambassador, “With the Germans we risk losing our liberty; with the Russians we lose our soul.” … continue
Aletho News Original Content
Three Mile Island, Global Warming and the CIA
By Aletho News | January 9, 2012
There appears to be something about launching bombs or missiles from afar onto cities and people that appeals to American military and political leaders. In part it has to do with a conscious desire to not risk American lives in ground combat. And in part, perhaps not entirely conscious, it has to do with not wishing to look upon the gory remains of the victims, allowing American GIs and TV viewers at home to cling to their warm fuzzy feelings about themselves, their government, and their marvelous “family values”. Washington officials are careful to distinguish between the explosives the US drops from the sky and “weapons of mass destruction” (WMD), which only the officially-designated enemies (ODE) are depraved enough to use. The US government speaks sternly of WMD, defining them as nuclear, chemical and biological in nature, and “indiscriminate” (meaning their use can’t be limited to military objectives), as opposed to the likes of American “precision” cruise missiles. This is indeed a shaky semantic leg to stand on, given the well-known extremely extensive damage to non-military targets, including numerous residences, schools and hospitals, even from American “smart” bombs, in almost all of the bombings listed below.
Moreover, Washington does not apply the term “weapons of mass destruction” to other weapons the US has regularly used, such as depleted uranium and cluster bombs, which can be, and often are, highly indiscriminate. … continue
About Aletho News’ Name
Blog Roll
Visits Since December 2009
- 4,283,598 hits
Looking for something?
Archives
Calendar
Categories
Aletho News Civil Liberties Corruption Deception Economics Environmentalism Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism Fake News False Flag Terrorism Full Spectrum Dominance Illegal Occupation Mainstream Media, Warmongering Militarism Nuclear Power Progressive Hypocrite Russophobia Science and Pseudo-Science Solidarity and Activism Subjugation - Torture Supremacism, Social Darwinism Timeless or most popular Video War Crimes Wars for IsraelTags
9/11 Afghanistan Africa AIPAC al-Qaeda Argentina Australia BBC Benjamin Netanyahu Bolivia Brazil Canada Central Intelligence Agency China CIA CNN Colombia Covid-19 Da’esh Donald Trump Egypt European Union Facebook FBI France Gaza Germany Google Hamas Hebron Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Human rights India Iran Iraq ISIS Israel Israeli settlement Japan Jerusalem John Kerry Korea Latin America Lebanon Libya Middle East National Security Agency NATO New York Times North Korea NSA Obama Pakistan Palestine Press TV Qatar Russia Sanctions against Iran Saudi Arabia Syria The Guardian Turkey Twitter UAE UK Ukraine United Nations United States USA Venezuela Washington Post West Bank Yemen ZionismRecent Comments
roberthstiver on Biden becomes the sixth succes… brianharryaustralia on Biden becomes the sixth succes… brianharryaustralia on Hague-based tribunal orders US… brianharryaustralia on For all its international post… roberthstiver on Hague-based tribunal orders US… SeaShell on IMPERIAL WASTE anon on Territorial dispute growing be… roberthstiver on The National-Security State… Joyce Bowen on Abandon ship! Governors scramb… Bernays and Propagan… on “Progressive” Journalism’s Leg… brianharryaustralia on Abandon ship! Governors scramb… brianharryaustralia on Hamas: Israel detention campai…
Aletho News
- Israel extends so-called administrative detention of two Palestinian officials March 4, 2021
- Biden becomes the sixth successive President to bomb Iraqis: how far could this latest round of escalation go? March 4, 2021
- The Disappearing Spy March 4, 2021
- Russia will take ‘tough measures’ against German media if Berlin impedes work of Russian journalists March 4, 2021
- Lorena Gonzales Versus Frank Wilkinson March 4, 2021
- For all its international posturing and boasting, the US can’t even take care of its citizens March 4, 2021
- IMPERIAL WASTE March 4, 2021
- Hague-based tribunal orders US to pay $37mln to Iran for breaching 1981 treaty March 4, 2021
- Territorial dispute growing between Guyana and Venezuela March 4, 2021
- The National-Security State Racket March 4, 2021
- James Cook University Walks Back Extreme Global Warming Coral Extinction Claims March 4, 2021
- Guardian ‘accidentally’ suggests Covid-like shutdowns every 2 years to meet Paris climate goals March 4, 2021
- Abandon ship! Governors scramble to end lockdowns, mask mandates March 4, 2021
- Why is Death After COVID-19 Vaccination Always Assumed to Be Coincidental? March 3, 2021
- 200,000 NHS Staff Are Refusing To Have a Jab. What Do They Know? March 3, 2021
- The Antibody Deception March 3, 2021
- Hamas: Israel detention campaigns aim to alter election results March 3, 2021
- Sweden Moves To Protect Academic Freedom After Professor Quits Covid Research Due To Harassment March 3, 2021
OffGuardian
- 5 ways they’re trying to trick you into taking the Covid “vaccine” March 4, 2021
- Delusions of Self-Defense: Biden Bombs Syria March 4, 2021
- Do As I Say, Not As I Do March 3, 2021
Consent Factory
- The Vaccine (Dis)Information War February 23, 2021
Richie Allen
If Americans Knew
Not A Lot Of People Know That
- Will Gummer Ban International Food? March 4, 2021
- More “Climate Change Killing Plants” Twaddle March 4, 2021
- Bermuda Hurricane Claims Don’t Stand Up To Scrutiny March 4, 2021
Sebastian Rushworth M.D.
- Amazon is censoring my book about covid! March 4, 2021
- Hydroxychloroquine for covid: Lifesaving or useless? March 4, 2021
More Links
Contact:
atheonews (at) gmail.comDisclaimer
This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Like their heartless benefactors, the Israelis think nothing of the mass murder and suffering they inflict on others, as long as they get what they want. The fact that they are committing war crimes and genocide is besides the point, and therefore irrelevant.
But, like the US, Israel does not want a bad public imagine, but not enough to not use depleted uranium, when it is so effective in infant mortality, grotesque birth-defects, and it is free from the big Satan, the USA.
DU is a chemical, biological and radiological weapon of mass destruction aimed at ethnic cleaning into perpetuity. The US never intends to live in Iraq or Afghanistan, or Iran for that matter. So, for the US for permanently poison those countries is not critically important, the US just wants all the oil and staging position for further aggression to loot every country in the world, unless they will just “say uncle” as Ronald Reagan expressed it in regard to Nicaragua.
Insanely, the Zionist Israelis are pretending ignorance of the inescapable reality of the consequences of their permanent contamination of Palestine. Their is no ideological, racial, or religious immunity to DU and its deadly consequences!
But, to think of name their CIA has adopted, the Mossad, after Mossada. Masada today is one of the Jewish people’s greatest symbols. Israeli soldiers take an oath there: “Masada shall not fall again.” – but is was a suicide pact, they kill themselves, to the last child, women, and man.
Psychotic with nuclear weapon they have threatened the world with, and have instigated the ‘”War on Terror'” and its pretext for being, as co-conspirators with the US criminal elite, 9/11 itself!
A few video links for young readers and folks who missed the great DU revelations in recent years.:
depleted uranium beyond treason gulf war iraq birth defects : 2 min 27 sec
Deformed Babies in Fallujah : 3 min 52 sec
Poison DUst – pt 8/8: 11 minutes
LikeLike
Bill,
The US is certainly not occupying these nations to get oil. Oil is easy to purchase and relatively inexpensive. Energy of all sorts is abundant and freely traded.
Wars are about territory, dominance and exploitation. Rarely do commodities enter into the realm of motivations.
LikeLike
Aletho,
Agreed, what is involved is “ethnic-cleansing” and terrain-deniability; a military term of securing strategic positions exclusive to the use of ones own forces.
The US dollar is being replaced by the Chinese with their own currency for international trade, with Asia following in their footsteps.
The US option is total military monopolization of oil that fuels the industry and mobility worldwide in the modern era.
John D. Rockefeller wanted invade Russia in 1898 as I can best remember to secure their oil fields. WW2 was about oil, and so is the war on terror, and as likely World War 3 if it happens!
Of course it can be perished on the world market, but the US has bogus money and more arms than the rest of the world combined. And that is the option the US has long taken, to take by force of arms; armed robbery under propagandist excuses, that we spend so much of our time debunking, and less on the “nature of the beast”
Imperialism is, as imperialism does!
LikeLike
Bill,
Along the theme of “terrain denial” we can also include “resource denial”, but that only enters into the equation in a total war scenario where the opponent has no oil (Germany in WWII being an example).
In the current situation the Zionists seek to deny their potential adversaries the income and trading relations that derive from their oil exports. It’s not about getting the oil but simply disabling the potential resistance to Zionist expansion.
They likewise seek to deprive their perceived adversaries of any type of economic development whatsoever, case in point being the utter destruction of Iraq’s industrial capacity as well as the assassination of scientists and professors.
The focus on oil is a distraction.
Remember, oil is both abundant and widely dispersed. To control it you need to control global shipping lanes not occupy production fields.
LikeLike
Aletho,
Thank you for that, and I concur; but was looking at the US mindset, not the Zionist; but maybe that is a fallacy… is there a deep difference, in who’s interest is being served!?
Certainly the Palestinians are “non-persons” to the US ruling usurping power elite; anymore than the lives and well-being of peoples of the world as whole.
Capitalism is basically a misanthropic economic system, and republics its now transparent veneer for Plutocratic concentration of power to protect and inheritance and exploit their advantage without a scruple or impediment.
LikeLike
Capitalism seems to be taking a back seat to Zionism, at least within the halls and boardrooms of power in the US. We have been witnessing one act of Congress after another which harms corporate interests yet serves Zionism (ILSA for example).
Meanwhile, the private sector continues to decline while the public sector is the only area of growth for almost a decade. The war economy is not a market economy and does not foster free enterprise.
LikeLike
And to what end? World Conquest! Why? “because we can!”.
That was the answer I got from the staff director of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in 1972 in reference to Vietnam.
Apparently the Israeli Zionist are of the same mindset, arrogantly impervious world public opinion, or guilty conscience. On the contrary, they are delighted with self-validation with 93% of the Israelis approval of the atrocious attacks on Gaza in operation ‘Cast Lead’ ( DU ) according to Haaretz.
LikeLike
That’s about it Bill, power, at any price.
LikeLike