Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

‘Firedoglake’ is progressive– just don’t talk about Palestine

By Philip Weiss on August 28, 2010

Here is an important matter that I have been sitting on for days and that people who care about American support for Palestinian oppression need to be aware of: the extent to which Firedoglake, a leading progressive site, suppresses criticism of Israel. The battle demonstrates that even inside the left, the Israel lobby is a strong force. Indeed, the founder of the site, movie producer Jane Hamsher, has dismissed concern for Palestinians as a “pet issue.”

As I have said often, our country cannot make progress on this critical policy issue until people who care about Palestinian freedom find one another and make a political combination to take on the Israel lobby. And one way we will find one another is by taking on the corruption inside the left when it comes to human rights in Palestine.

The latest evidence of FDL’s entrenchment is an exchange yesterday at Firedoglake’s community site, The Seminal. An FDL author whom I follow– Kathleen Galt, who writes under the name Leen and for whom Palestine is front and center– did a post called “Change?” saying that Israel/Palestine continues to be off limits for the liberal mainstream media:

Does the Israeli Palestinian conflict, expanding illegal settlements, humiliation of Palestinians, bulldozing of Palestinians homes, destruction of Palestinian olive trees, continue to be off limits to so called progressive MSM host like Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Dylan Ratigan, Ed etc? I think this critical issue is still off limits to most MSM outlets.

Galt did a search of several progressive broadcasts and found not a peep about Palestine.

“So my question is this. Do folks think that anything has changed about the amount, depth, honesty of coverage by our T.V. MSM over the last several years? Has anything changed?”

In the subsequent comment thread, Galt complained that leftwing blogs were also blindered. And she specifically mentioned Rayne, the moderator of The Seminal.

I am also very interested in which so called progressive sites were blocked to discussing this critical issue, which sites drug their progressive feet on the issue, demanded higher standards of definitions of terms “zionism” than they demand of other over used general terms? Selective discrimination etc of certain issues but not others. Avoid having their heavy hitters or bringing on a heavy hitter to blog about this critical issue every week? Blog clogs of sorts specifically clogged on this issue.

Crooks and Liars has been closed down to this issue from the beginning, Huffington Post has opened up…

Still wondering why Rayne has specifically targeted this topic and is demanding higher standards for this issue more so than any other issue?

Rayne responded with a sharp rebuke:

…Let’s make this perfectly clear again that you are not an editor, moderator, site owner or host at this site, and that simply because you personally feel an issue should be handled in a particular fashion doesn’t mean it’s going to happen as you demand.

Give some thought to the possibility that your constant harangue about the manner in which this site operates drives off others — readers, commenters, diarists alike — who may not want to encourage your posts and posts like yours by recommending them.

Inside the last several weeks you’ve already attacked the owner/founder of the FDL family of sites for not fulfilling your personal expectations. You did not take the hint at the time about your behavior. And don’t think I haven’t seen your terse comments directed at me, either. This is yet another warning to you that you need to focus on subjects of your choice, stop haranguing the site’s policies and operations, or risk moderation….

Galt responded in her typically thoughtful manner:

Many of my posts have been recommended. There have been times where folks have come out of the woodwork and folks who regularly make comments here and stated that they greatly appreciate what I have posted here…. [I am] just suggesting that having a qualified individual do regular post[s] about the I/P conflict might just might be a path for FDL to take on this critical issue. This is not just my issue. You may personally [be] in the dark about this issue. For decades middle east leaders, former Presidents, former heads of the IAEA, former and present weapons inspectors, former and present CiA analyst etc have stated that the I/P issue is the most critical issue to resolve in the middle east. Now you can keep attempting to minimize the importance of this conflict but that does not change the situation. You can attempt to close down the discussion, debate etc here but that in and of itself says a great deal…

Beautiful, huh? And obvious.

More

August 28, 2010 - Posted by | Full Spectrum Dominance

3 Comments »

  1. I was banned from the political forum of Amazon over this issue of Zionism. Not to hard to figure that one. But when I, and along with quite a few others were excomunicated in, what I would call a “Stalinist purge” from the self described “progressive” website, Op Ed News over the same issue [under cover of the often used excuse ‘ad homenim’], it became obvious how much pressure abounds.

    We began our own free speech oriented site, Coalition of the Obvious [COTO], which continues to becme more popular every day, with hits from all over the world.

    We do not pretend to by “progressive”, nor buy into any pidgin-hole, or fall for the phony R/L paradigm–our moto is TRUTH nomatter where it leads.

    http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/if-sanity-were-to-come-to-human-kind/#comments

    \\ll// a sample of what you will find there

    Like

    hybridrogue1's avatar Comment by hybridrogue1 | August 28, 2010 | Reply

  2. firedoglake booted me for talking about the palestinians’ plight

    Like

    henry's avatar Comment by henry | August 28, 2010 | Reply

  3. Their progressive EXCEPT when it involves their beloved Israel, then they transform into bloodthirsty savages, foaming at the mouth. They’ll also commit any treasonous crime to support the “Jewish” state. Like cover-up the 9/11 false-flag hoax.

    They CANNOT be trusted in ANY capacity WHATSOEVER.

    Like

    Disgusted's avatar Comment by Disgusted | August 30, 2010 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.