Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Saudi splurges on weapons … for what?

By Teymoor Nabili | Al-Jazeera | September 14th, 2010

Saudi Arabia is about to buy another $60bn worth of military hardware from the US, and even The Guardian is dutiful in parroting, without question, the accepted western narrative :

The sale, under negotiation since 2007, is aimed mainly at bolstering Saudi defenses against Iran, which the US suspects will achieve a nuclear weapons capability within the next few years. The transfer of advanced technology, mainly planes, is to provide Saudi Arabia with air superiority over Iran.

Ignoring the fact that miltary aircraft (which form the bulk of the deal as we know it) are pretty much useless against a nuclear missile, especially one that does not exist, $60bn buys a mind boggling amount of firepower, so that must mean that Saudi Arabia’s military capacity right now is woefully insufficient compared to Iran’s, right?

Er, no.

Saudi military spending already dwarfs Iran’s by a factor of six. Indeed, by head of population, Saudi is the world’s biggest purchaser of military hardware.

Global Firepower has a direct comparison of the two nations’ military strengths, and it turns out that Iran’s military is only superior in terms of manpower numbers.

So if Iran’s intention is to send waves of soldiers marching across the desert, then maybe Saudi has something to fear.

But when it comes to “air-based weapons”, Global Firepower puts the relative numbers (before this deal) at Saudi 453, Iran 84. (Bear in mind also that Iran’s aircraft are widely described as museum pieces by military analysts, because the sanctions mean that Iran has no access to spare parts or modern technology).

So why does Saudi need 84 new F-15 fighter jets, 70 upgraded F-15s, 70 Apaches, 72 Black Hawks and 36 “Little Birds”, just to fight a land army?

And when you consider the reality that Saudi has the full support of all the US military bases in the region, the suggestion that Riyadh has something to fear from Tehran is laughable.

So if the numbers don’t add up, what about the politics? Well, the suggestion that Iran is keen to invade Saudi Arabia makes even less sense than the suggestion that Tehran intends to attack Israel, and the Arab world knows it.

As King Abdullah of Jordan said recently, the Arab world is much more concerned about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict than any Iran issue.

And, as a major survey of the Arab public opinion found recently, the Arab majority not only agrees with King Abdullah but is in fact very sympathetic of Iran’s right to nuclear technology, with a majority saying a nuclear-armed Iran may in fact be a good thing for the region.

Amjad Atalla of New America Foundation has an excellent summary of this whole debate here.

And the American Foreign Policy Project covers many of the myths and nuances of the military and security debates concerning Iran here.

So, if the mainstream media have missed the point, then what is really going on?

Well, with America suffering it’s worst recession in 60 years, the biggest arms contract ever signed would certainly be a welcome boost to earnings in the military industrial sector.

And as I blogged a year ago, Saudi Arabia has always been keen to buy as much favor in Washington as it can, because it’s concerned that any hint of warming relations between DC and Tehran would almost by definition be a threat to Riyadh’s regional hegemony.

September 16, 2010 - Posted by | Economics, Militarism

2 Comments »

  1. Once Saudi Arabia is armed to their teeth and piled up too much military hardware in their arsenal,they become a treath to one of the neighbors “Israel” and may have to be taken out like they have done in Iraq?
    First they giveth and then they taketh away.

    Like

    B.Benhamid's avatar Comment by B.Benhamid | September 16, 2010 | Reply

  2. Once upon a time a great superpower wanted a friend it could rely on amid the shifting sands of Mideast affairs, a friend swimming in a sea of oil, a man the superpower could do business with. The superpower of course found its man, and of course put its man on the throne, but oddly this great gift of power granted to the friend seemed not sufficient to ensure true comradeship. Rising trade between the two countries, mutual defense treaties, state visits, protestations of friendship among the leaders…nothing seemed enough to ensure a lasting friendship except an endless outpouring of the latest weapons.

    So that is what the superpower did, nearly sinking its true Mideast friend in a pile of the best in modern Western military technology. And then–hold on to your seats–the Mideast friend came to think of himself as the greatest of the great, the king of kings, or more precisely the Shah of Shahs. Infected by that highly contagious Potomac fever called hubris, he alienated his people and then dropped dead, provoking a revolution that was naturally determined to wash the country free of superpower influence.

    I just thought you might enjoy the story; it of course has absolutely nothing to do with Saudi-American relations.

    Like

    William deB. Mills's avatar Comment by William deB. Mills | September 16, 2010 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.