This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Let’s see what’s going on here… Basically, the Egyptian Islamists are seeking to change the one thing in the Camp David peace agreement that precludes in practical terms an Egyptian attack…
I’m specifically referring to Article 4 which focuses on security arrangements along the border and limits the deployment of Egyptian armed forces in the Sinai peninsula….
Now why does anybody think this is something Israel should contemplate let alone agree to?!…
LikeLike
This psychopath is drewling. A racist, terrorist state does not have ANY moral or other rights to demand this or that! The Egyptians ought to shred the whole Oslo Peace Agreement, a Versailles treaty for the ME, that guarantees the despicable policies of the murderous stat called Israel.
On a cheerful note, if Obama means business then we are in business! Read below
http://www.debka.com/article/22380/Obama-snubs-Netanyahu-on-Iran-My-decisions—only-what%E2%80%99s-right-for-America
LikeLike
My my my… That’s quite a rant… Psychopath, drewling (sic), racist and terrorist… Despite you’re usage of all the expected buzzwords the fact remains that Israel has every right to demand that the treaty it signed with Egypt be honored…
BTW, the Olso agreement has nothing to do with these so called Camp David accords…
As for Obama, I’m afraid that history will show hime to be the equivalent of Chamberlain…
LikeLike
Wait!, the problem is that Egypt cannot, legally or morally, uphold the Camp David accords, when co-signatory, Israel, is not respecting its obligations.
What is PressTV trying to imply?
LikeLike
Obviously PressTV is trying to imply that the accords are no longer in effect… Of course, the fact that PressTV claims that Israel isn’t respecting its obligations doesn’t make it so…
LikeLike