Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

NATO commander reveals plans for intervention in Syria

Press TV – March 20, 2013

NATO’s supreme commander says the alliance is drawing up contingency plans for a possible military intervention in Syria.

Admiral James Stavridis, commander of US European Command, said at the Senate Armed Services Committee that US military would be ready to take part in the aggression, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

Stavridis also serves as NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR).

The United States is “looking at a variety of operations. We are prepared if called upon to be engaged,” he said.

The US commander said the 28-member military alliance is also looking into the option of assisting the foreign-backed militants fighting against the Syrian government.

Stavridis further added that the negotiations within the NATO member states also concentrated on imposing a no-fly zone over Syria and providing lethal support to the militants.

The official confirmed that targeting Syria’s air defenses would also be taken into consideration.

On March 18, US Secretary of State John Kerry said Washington would not ‘stand in the way’ of Europeans if they decide to arm the militants fighting against the Syrian government.

The Los Angeles Times reported on March 16 that the CIA is considering a secret contingency plan to expand the US assassination drone strikes to Syria, according to former and current US officials.

The US publicly claims that its role in Syria is merely limited to providing food and medical supplies to the anti-government militants, but the Croatian daily Jutarnji List revealed on March 7 that the US has coordinated shipments of weapons from Croatia to the militants in Syria.

The report said 3,000 tons of weapons in 75 planeloads have been transferred from Zagreb to the militants in Syria via Jordan and Turkey. The weapons were reportedly paid for by Saudi Arabia at the request of the US.

March 20, 2013 - Posted by | Militarism | , , , , ,

2 Comments »

  1. By now, the whole world ought to know that wars of intervention are not about saving lives because more people lose their lives as a result of these interventionist wars. It is what happens after the war powers get into a resource rich nation, how the resources of that nation are carved up among themselves and the proxy leader that they install.

    Like

    Ribeekah's avatar Comment by Ribeekah | March 20, 2013 | Reply

    • So, Syria is “rich in resources” now too?

      Maybe we need to consider other patterns, ones that hold.

      Like

      aletho's avatar Comment by aletho | March 20, 2013 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.