Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Federal Judge Allows EFF’s NSA Mass Spying Case to Proceed

Rejects Government’s State Secret Privilege Claims in Jewel v. NSA and Shubert v. Obama

EFF | July 8, 2013

San Francisco – A federal judge today rejected the U.S. government’s latest attempt to dismiss the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s (EFF’s) long-running challenge to the government’s illegal dragnet surveillance programs. Today’s ruling means the allegations at the heart of the Jewel case move forward under the supervision of a public federal court.

“The court rightly found that the traditional legal system can determine the legality of the mass, dragnet surveillance of innocent Americans and rejected the government’s invocation of the state secrets privilege to have the case dismissed,” said Cindy Cohn, EFF’s Legal Director. “Over the last month, we came face-to-face with new details of mass, untargeted collection of phone and Internet records, substantially confirmed by the Director of National Intelligence. Today’s decision sets the stage for finally getting a ruling that can stop the dragnet surveillance and restore Americans’ constitutional rights.”

In the ruling, Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District of California federal court agreed with EFF that the very subject matter of the lawsuit is not a state secret, and any properly classified details can be litigated under the procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). As Judge White wrote in the decision, “Congress intended for FISA to displace the common law rules such as the state secrets privilege with regard to matter within FISA’s purview.” While the court allowed the constitutional questions to go forward, it also dismissed some of the statutory claims. A status conference is set for August 23.

EFF’s Jewel case is joined in the litigation with another case, Shubert v. Obama.

“We are pleased that the court found that FISA overrides the state secrets privilege and look forward to addressing the substance of the illegal mass surveillance,” said counsel for Shubert, Ilann Maazel of Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP. “The American people deserve their day in court.”

Filed in 2008, Jewel v. NSA is aimed at ending the NSA’s dragnet surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans and holding accountable the government officials who illegally authorized it. Evidence in the case includes undisputed documents provided by former AT&T telecommunications technician Mark Klein showing AT&T has routed copies of Internet traffic to a secret room in San Francisco controlled by the NSA. The case is supported by declarations from three NSA whistleblowers along with a mountain of other evidence. The recent blockbuster revelations about the extent of the NSA spying on telecommunications and Internet activities also bolster EFF’s case.

For the full decision:
https://www.eff.org/node/74895

For more on Jewel v. NSA:
https://www.eff.org/cases/jewel

July 9, 2013 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Corruption, Deception, Full Spectrum Dominance, Progressive Hypocrite

1 Comment »

  1. The courts may consider the privacy consequences of US agencies’ spying directly on American citizens but they will not likely consider the implications of the Echelon chinese wall system for avoiding US constitutional conflict.

    Echelon and related systems allow the allied USA, Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand SigInt communities to harvest all communications for surveillance and spying on each others citizens without court ordered authority or target naming warrant. Because espionage on foreign citizens is not prohibited, domestic surveillance is framed as foreign intelligence but conducted by “sovereign” allied agencies (regardless of whether the sovereignty foreign nation’s government is properly informed of what human rights infractions are being undertaken on behalf of the USA).

    Echelon became the convenient legalistic infrastructure for a US domestic surveillance, domestic spying and homeland intelligence system domiciled in allied host countries outside the USA and intended to become effectively exempt from US Constitutional oversight. Echelon avoids oversight in the same way that CIA extraordinary rendition avoids oversight –by having the torture assisted interrogations remotely conducted by foreign nationals on foreign soil.

    The intelligence products of Echelon and its successors and derivatives provide many decades of useful intelligence on citizens’ personal activities, practices, interests and connections usually adequate to dissuade or compromise any testimony, whistle-blowing, or legally actionable release.

    Echelon products also provide pre-emptive awareness of threat adequate to thoroughly compromise undesirable exposure and undermine public citizen and political demands for subjecting this system and its fruits to domestic constitutional and international multilateral oversight and human rights and privacy safeguards.

    The Echelon and derivative SigInt systems are tools of war, if not weapons of war and must be subjected to domestic Constitutional and international safeguards in order to protect human rights and privacy from the presumption of thought crime. These systems undermine democracy in participating countries and create insider markets for trades in personal and private business information to convey huge manipulative advantage to foreign agencies and commercial and corporate interests.

    M\\

    Like

    Michael\\'s avatar Comment by Michael\\ | July 9, 2013 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.