Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Israel’s ‘Hannibal Protocol’ and Two Criminally Insane Governments

By Dave Lindorff | This Can’t Be Happening | August 7, 2014

The sickness of present-day Israel, on display over the past horrible month of the one-sided slaughter of nearly 2000 Palestinians (including over 400 children) in the fenced-in ghetto of Gaza, has finally reached its nadir with the ugly case of the deliberate Israeli Defense Force murder of captured IDF 2nd Lt. Hadar Goldin.

According to an article in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, once it was determined that Goldin had been captured by Hamas fighters in the Gaza town of Rafah, the IDF initiated what it calls the “Hannibal Protocol” — the deliberate liquidation of the captive — to prevent his being used as a hostage to win concessions from Israel in future truce negotiations with the Palestinians. One reason for the almost instantaneous and ruthless Israeli decision to kill Goldin rather than attempt to rescue him, is that this captured soldier had the misfortune of being related to Israel’s defense minister, Moshe Yaalon, making him a valuable prize indeed for Hamas.

And so began a massive bombardment of the entire residential area where Goldin was captured.

As Haaretz reports in an editorial about this case of deliberate sacrifice of an IDF officer, headlined “What Happened in Rafah?”, the ensuing high-explosive blitz on the area didn’t just kill Goldin, but also indiscriminately killed over 150 Palestinians, most of them civilians, including many women and children. Indeed, the paper states that the IDF “… shelled and bombed houses and their inhabitants indiscriminately, and as they tried to flee homes, hit them with shells and bombs in the streets.” The fatal bombing of a targeted UN-operated school in Rafah, which was condemned by the US government and by UN General Secretary Ban Ki-Moon, who called it a “criminal act and a moral outrage,” was part of that Hannibal Protocol action.

Now recall that President Obama was quick to label the Hamas capture of Goldin “barbaric.”

The trouble is, having rather absurdly deployed that term to characterize the capture by Hamas fighters of an Israeli soldier who was at the time reportedly exploring a tunnel and trying to capture or kill enemy fighters, though, what then does Obama — what indeed does any person — call the indiscriminate slaughter of 150 civilians in the interest of eliminating one of one’s own captured soldier?

Certainly the Hannibal Protocol is in itself “barbaric” in its cool calculus of denying the enemy a bargaining chip. But that term hardly seems to capture the horror of what was done by the IDF in this case. Clearly implementing the Hannibal Protocol would have been okayed at the highest level of the Israeli government, particularly with the relative of a top government official involved. And when a military organization or a government moves beyond just killing the captive and his immediate captors to slaughtering everyone in the surrounding area, we’ve moved way beyond a word like “barbaric.”

I’m a journalist, and part of my job is being good with words, but I admit I’m at a bit of a loss here. Perhaps “criminally insane” is appropriate, but that is usually a term applied to an individual. In this case, though, we are talking about a whole government, or at least the military establishment and the senior leaders of that government, taken collectively.

The mind reels. Can an entire government be criminally insane? Certainly what happened with this Hannibal Protocol incident suggests that it can.

Recall, though, that this crime extends well beyond the borders of Israel. For the bombs and shells that were unleashed by the IDF on the people of Rafah as part of this murderous Hannibal Protocol campaign were, for the most part, manufactured and provided, at taxpayer expense, by the United States of America.

This massive war crime is thus as much a US atrocity as it is an Israeli one.

And if the Israeli government is criminally insane, so is the US government for uncritically and unthinkingly backing it.

We knew the US government and its military were criminally insane back in the Vietnam War, when we were told that peasant villages were being burned to the ground by US troops on the theory that “we have to destroy the village in order to save it.” Now we’ve moved a step further towards the depths of insanity in backing an Israeli policy of “slaughtering a village in order to kill one of our own soldiers.” Even in the moral cesspool that was America’s war on the Vietnamese people, the US military didn’t sink to that — they stopped at just slaughtering villlages.

August 8, 2014 - Posted by | Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism, War Crimes | , , , ,

3 Comments »

  1. Notwithstanding that nuclear weapons are evidence of insanity, the idea of a clearly insane & paranoid state being armed to the teeth with nuclear and other mass destruction weapons also proves the insanity of those who armed that state. So Obama, what are you going to do with this inhumane mad and murderous Golem you have created? Can you leash your rapacious Zionist dogs of war? If not then, civilization, if you would continue this experiment requires that you neutralize them (if you still can), because emboldened as they are, their outrage and atrocity can only become worse. And Mr Obama, you set the abysmal standard of civilized response for Israel by unleashing your own brutally insane terrorist janissaries on Syria and Iraq. Be a gentle man sir, join with Russia to unilaterally guarantee Israel’s 1967 borders, disarm it and implement the two state solution in Palestine and provide for a conditional right of return over the next 10 years while compelling Israel to remove race, religious and apartheid protocols for full citizenship. Do this before Israel eliminates another 400 children from any possibility of returning, because as you clearly know, that is what this atrocity is all about. M\\

    Like

    Michael\\'s avatar Comment by Michael\\ | August 8, 2014 | Reply

    • It’s hard to leash that which has had you leashed since childhood. Most in positions of authority wear the choke collar. Obama a top example.

      Like

      aletho's avatar Comment by aletho | August 8, 2014 | Reply

  2. If and when it becomes undeniably apparent that Obama is powerless to put the Zionist genie back in the bottle, and when sufficient numbers of American citizens see that they and their constitution are being held hostage not for Jewish security but for the Zionist syndicate, then perhaps they will respond in defense of their sovereignty, their constitution, their democracy and their citizenship. But if they do not respond, then they provide license for expansion of the Zionist project and US national authorization for it to act globally and belligerently in its own interests but with the resources and weapons of and in the name of the United States.

    Nothing is as attractive to criminals as the undefended concentration of power and wealth. That vast unguarded attraction is what the US has become for the financial empire which seeks un-abstracted control of property, public policy, resources and public authority. We choose Zionism to become our political master by merely delaying making a choice for ourselves.

    Likely we have already delayed our response too long and the era of universal suffrage is about to be replaced with an era of overt corporate elite and aristocratic citizenship. Eventually, they will jettison the temporary Zionist sabot with which they targeted national self-determination and civil and human rights. Israel and the general presumption that it is owed an exceptional pass from civilization is that teflon sabot.

    But the ultimate protection of Jews and all other minorities is not Israel with capacity for massive punitive nuclear response but our citizenship, our sovereignty, our self determination and our democratic control of our institutions. M\\

    Like

    Michael\\'s avatar Comment by Michael\\ | August 8, 2014 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.