Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Is the world ready for further reduction of nuclear weapons?

Dr Alexander Yakovenko – RT – February 27, 2016

One of the most important tasks in the field of international security is to rid the world of the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction.

Russia has been constantly advocating further limitations and reductions of nuclear weapons stockpiles along with strengthening international regimes of arms control and non-proliferation.

However, further dialogue on nuclear disarmament, held both bilaterally and multilaterally, could only be successful if the core principle of international security is observed, i.e. that the security of one country should not be strengthened at the expense of the security of others.

Unfortunately, what is happening now is a far cry from what the international community has been striving for. Among other things it is about global stability and deterrence; the trust between Russia and the West is diminishing. Some of the critical Russian concerns are left unaddressed.

First of all, as a result of the Russia-US New START Treaty, which entered into force in 2011, the number of nuclear warheads has already been reduced to the level of late 1950s or early 1960s. Thus, it brings up the issue of other nuclear states, including UK, joining the effort.

Secondly, further reductions are impossible while Washington is busy creating a global BMD system and conducting research into conventional weapons with a strategic range.

There is also serious concern over the possible transfer of the arms race to outer space. The Russian initiative to draft a legally binding document to ban the deployment of weapons in outer space is, unfortunately, hindered by the West. Before any concrete steps are made in this area, we’ve got to have guarantees against any imbalances in conventional armaments. The lack of progress in coming into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty is also a major factor.

Where are, after all, political logic and common sense, when the US pushes forward its disarmament proposal, while continuing to undermine Russia’s defense and industrial potential through restrictive measures and sanctions?

Above all, the trust between our sides is well below the “Cold War” level as the West launched an unprecedented media campaign against Russia and its political leadership. We cannot seriously consider proposals that amount to playing a one-sided game or rather, a game with no rules or with rules that are arbitrarily changed in Washington.

If, and when, all of the above circumstances change and our concerns and priorities are taken into account, including equal and indivisible security for all states, then it will be possible to consider discussing further nuclear reduction.

Dr Alexander Yakovenko, Russian Ambassador to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Deputy foreign minister (2005-2011). Follow him on Twitter @Amb_Yakovenko

February 28, 2016 - Posted by | Militarism, Progressive Hypocrite, Timeless or most popular | , ,

1 Comment »

  1. “Reduction” of Nuclear Weapons” presumably means the USA, Russia, France, Britain China and Israel are wanting to reduce their own massive stockpiles(which I doubt very much will happen). If you are talking about stopping other nations from acquiring Nuclear Weapons, that would require restraint on(particularly) the USA from continuing its aggression around the World in “liberating” countries like Iraq, Libya, Syria, and soon Lebanon and Iran.
    Since Nth Korea got “The Bomb” the USA has almost stopped bullying NK. New countries wanting ‘The Bomb’ have taken note of this American ‘softening’ and so it’s probably a safe bet that the chances of other nations wanting the Bomb has Increased.
    “Reducing Nuclear Proliferation” has got NO chance……………..

    Like

    Brian Harry, Australia's avatar Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | February 28, 2016 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.