This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.
“Furthermore, the Russian official stressed that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict should be solved on the basis of international law, including UN General Assembly resolutions and the Arab Peace Initiative”.
I know his intentions are good, but Israel routinely ignores UN General Assembly resolutions urging it to behave in a fair and decent manner, towards the Palestinians……..Israel has NO intention of taking their “Jackboots” off the necks of the Palestinians……and the USA Government, just looks the other way, and whistles Dixie…….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | February 20, 2020 |
Here, good on Russia! (although Russia often projects itself, in my view, as two-faced regarding the Palestinian-Ziomonster morass)
Good on Hamas! It is the true nationalistic representative of all Palestinians. (I’ve always been drawn to and had great respect for Dr. Meshaal…good to see that he is still active and useful. Also good that the Ziomonster has not — yet — found the opportunity to exploit an opportunity to assassinate him.)
Viva Palestine!
LikeLike
Comment by roberthstiver | February 20, 2020 |
Hamas’s peaceful diplomatic missions testify to its enviable patience to counter Israeli propaganda against it. But aren’t there enough General Assembly Resolutions censuring Zionist aggression, repression, theft and war crimes? Mikhail Bogdanov should persuade President Putin to Table a Resolution to the Security Council calling for universal sanctions against the rogue state until it abides by international law, withdraws from Occupied Territory, lifts the siege, stops bombing Gaza, demolishing villages and imprisoning children for a start.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Comment by jbthring | February 21, 2020 |
Great comment! Wish that “We, the people…” had a hotline to President Putin. He can, and should, pursue his intensely Russian-nationalistic views and policies, but he should leave ample room for support of those suffering while waiting for an end to colonialism, state terrorism, human rights violations, vast injustice et al. The hapless Palestinians are tormented, with excruciating Zionist vindictiveness (a vindictiveness grounded, I am convinced, in a guilt complex that has become a raging criminal psychosis that no one has the vision or courage to confront and take measures to control), beyond all measure….
I wrote at another venue a couple of days ago, while assessing the status of the Ziomonster “left” — it’s a mere memory — of my recall of the “great old man” Israeli Jew Uri Avnery (R.I.P. ~two years ago at 94), whose life traversed soldier-Zionist-terrorist-parliamentarian-author-peaceseeker-editor-prophet-dissident leader of Gush Shalom intersections along the path of his life. He was able to overcome the psychosis recognized by him, but he was the lonely — and vilified for it — exception. (I shouldn’t “gush” all over MK Avnery: to his end, he harbored hope that a “two state” solution might come to reality, thus saving the land and the Israel he couldn’t but love. His passion, I believe, was always directed to that end even after his conversion to the “left” — and the Palestinians, let us remember, reluctantly accepted that reality as far back as 1988. [To me, “two-state” was finally executed by the Zionists circa 2006.])
LikeLiked by 1 person
Comment by roberthstiver | February 21, 2020 |