Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA

Seven Australian Authors Publish Comprehensive Peer-Reviewed Paper Concluding Genetic Vaccines Must be Pulled

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH | Courageous Discourse  | October 25, 2023

People commonly ask me for “comprehensive” publications on vaccine side effects. It is fair to point out that the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is contained in the virus and it is uncontrollably produced by the mRNA and adenoviral DNA COVID-19 vaccines. Because the vaccines failed to stop COVID-19, most vaccinated persons have had the illness, thereby having multiple Spike protein exposures.

Parry, et al, published a comprehensive review on the litany of Spike-protein diseases that occur after its widespread distribution in the body. Here are some of their evidence based teaching points:

  • SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is pathogenic, whether from the virus or created from genetic code in mRNA and adenovector DNA vaccines.
  • Biodistribution rodent study data show lipid nanoparticles carry mRNA to all organs and cross blood-brain and blood-placenta barriers. Some of these tissues are likely to be impervious to viral infection; therefore, the biohazard is particularly from vaccination.
  • Lipid-nanoparticles have inflammatory properties.
  • The modification of mRNA with N1-methylpseudouridine for increased stability leads to the production of spike proteins for months. It is uncertain how many cells and from which organs mRNA spike proteins are produced, and therefore, the exact effective dose delivered per vaccine vial is unknown.
  • The long-term fate of mRNA within cells is currently unknown.
  • The mRNA and adenovector DNA vaccines act as ‘synthetic viruses’.
  • In the young and healthy, and even in many older individuals with vulnerable comorbidities, the encoding-based COVID-19 vaccines will likely transfect a far more diverse set of tissues than infection by the virus itself.
  • Evidence suggests reverse transcription of mRNA into a DNA copy is possible. This further suggests the possibility of intergenerational transmission if germline cells incorporate the DNA copy into the host genome.
  • Production of foreign proteins such as spike protein on cell surfaces can induce autoimmune responses and tissue damage. This has profoundly negative implications for any future mRNA-based drug or vaccine.
  • The spike protein exerts its pathophysiological effects (‘spikeopathy’) via several mechanisms that lead to inflammation, thrombogenesis, and endotheliitis-related tissue damage and prion-related dysregulation. Interaction of the vaccine-encoded spike protein with ACE-2, P53 and BRCA1 suggests a wide range of possible biological interference with oncological potential.
  • Adverse event data from official pharmacovigilance databases, an FDA-Pfizer report obtained via FOI, show high rates and multiple organ systems affected: primarily neurological, cardiovascular, and reproductive.
  • Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines’ clinical trial data independently interpreted has been peer-review and published to show an unfavourable risk/benefit, especially in the non-elderly. The risks for children clearly outweigh the benefits.
  • Repeated COVID-19 vaccine booster doses appear to induce tolerance and may contribute to recurrent COVID-19 infection and ‘long COVID’.

“The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has revealed deficiencies in public health and medicines regulatory agencies. A root cause analysis is needed for what now appears a rushed response to an alarming infectious disease pandemic. Treatment modalities for ‘spikeopathy’-related pathology in many organ systems, require urgent research and provision to millions of sufferers of long-term COVID-19 vaccine injuries. We also advocate for the suspension of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines and lipid-nanoparticle carrier matrices, and other vaccines based on mRNA or viral-vector DNA technology. A safer course is to use vaccines with well-tested recombinant protein, attenuated or inactivated virus technologies, of which there are now many for vaccinating against SARS-CoV-2.”

Parry PI, Lefringhausen A, Turni C, Neil CJ, Cosford R, Hudson NJ, Gillespie J. ‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 17;11(8):2287. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082287. PMID: 37626783; PMCID: PMC10452662.

October 25, 2023 - Posted by | Science and Pseudo-Science | ,

9 Comments »

  1. I’m convinced by the arguments that viruses don’t exist, so I’m convinced that Peter McCullough is wrong about their existence. I highly suspect he’s “controlled opposition”: he was set up to take a strong stance against the current Covid vaccines with the intention of solidifying the idea in people’s minds that the virus is a threat, so that enough people will take new vaccines when they’re said to be “safe, for real this time”. The most visible proponents of the idea that viruses don’t exist, Samantha Bailey and Andrew Kaufman also promote flat-earthers like Steve Falconer of Spacebusters and Amandha Vollmer. I highly suspect that Bailey and Kaufman were also propped up by the pharmaceutical giants or the overlords of big pharma, but to tell the truth about viruses, only to bring ridicule on themselves so people associate ‘no-virus’ with ridiculousness. This will make it difficult for people like me to tell my friends “hey, listen to Sam Bailey explain this”, when I’m worried that they’ll see her flat-earth nonsense. Or, if I explain the argument myself, they might catch wind of all the flat-earthers on my side.

    In short, the psychological campaign against the masses runs deep, and most if not all prominent names are in on it.

    I do wonder about Stefano Scoglio. So far in my search for info, he’s seemed to me to be a reliable source. Has anyone seen any red flags from him?

    Like

    Matt's avatar Comment by Matt | October 26, 2023 | Reply

  2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32844124/ ACE2 coding variants. The Amish and Askkenazi are least affected by the spike proteins according to this study of genetic susceptibility to the spike proteins. This opens a conversation about weaponization of the virus by a certain group.

    Like

    rediscover911com's avatar Comment by rediscover911com | October 26, 2023 | Reply

    • There might be a weaponization of whatever causes the marks of what is called the spike protein. If there is no corona virus, there is no spike. So, again, there might be some mark which is being wrongly interpreted as a spike protein, which is caused by some weapon.

      Like

      Matt's avatar Comment by Matt | October 26, 2023 | Reply

    • It would be interesting to put Jessica Rose on the case to sort out the Ashkenazi stats.

      Like

      aletho's avatar Comment by aletho | October 26, 2023 | Reply

    • It’s important to understand how empirical logic works. Regarding, specifically, the identification of Sars-CoV-2 as the cause of the sicknesses called Covid-19, while it’s clear that Koch’s Postulates have not been satisfied—Judy Mikovitz has said that it’s unreasonable to hold virus identification to those postulates because a virus can’t continue to be a virus when completely isolated—it’s also important to understand that J. S. Mill’s methods for determining the cause of a phenomenon, commonly called “Mill’s Methods”, have not been followed. This later fact, especially, relegates the naming of Sars-CoV-2 as the cause of sicknesses called Covid-19 to a bare hypothesis. Furthermore, Stefano Scoglio says that what virologists call the isolate contains trillions of different particles all of which, as well as any combination of those, not to mention outside factors, should be equal candidates for consideration as a cause, so we have potentially a quadrillion candidates for consideration as the cause. This makes finding a virus-size cause using Mill’s Methods practically impossible. Therefore, it’s safe to say that their bare hypothesis is wrong, “gain of function” is a fraud and the related patents are for bogus products.

      Please read chapter XVII, Inductive Methods, of John Venn’s book, The Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic. Chapter XVII starts on pg. 403.

      https://archive.org/details/principlesempir02venngoog/page/403/mode/1up?view=theater

      Like

      Matt's avatar Comment by Matt | October 27, 2023 | Reply

      • Matt, how do you account for NIST FOIA released letters to 19 researchers/facilities with instruction to “suspend gain of function research” into the bat coronavirus in October, 2014? The link to these FOIA letters is included in my article. Did you read those letters?

        Like

        rediscover911com's avatar Comment by rediscover911com | October 27, 2023 | Reply

        • I read your article. If you had read and understood Venn’s chapter on inductive methods you wouldn’t have asked me these new questions.

          Like

          Matt's avatar Comment by Matt | October 27, 2023 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.