Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

France ‘Prepares for War’ and Threatens European Security Architecture

By Lucas Leiroz | Strategic Culture Foundation | March 22, 2024

France continues to take steps towards militarization and escalating tensions with Russia. Amid discussions about whether or not to send French troops to Ukrainian territory, officials in Paris have made controversial statements about a supposed “preparation for war”, leading many analysts to believe that relations between France and Russia are close to a point-of-no-return — which could obviously have catastrophic consequences for the European continent and the entire world.

In a recent statement, Pierre Schill, commander of the French Army, stated that his troops are in combat readiness, capable of engaging in war at any time — if necessary. He believes that today’s France is severely threatened. In this sense, the country must be prepared to go to war against states that pose a danger to Paris.

At the same time, the government’s official speech continues to become increasingly aggressive towards the Russian Federation. French President Emmanuel Macron has advanced plans to increase his country’s interventionism in the Ukrainian conflict — and continues to refuse to rule out the hypothesis of direct intervention by French troops on the battlefield. In practice, France is simply advancing a plan that would certainly lead to direct war against Russia, which obviously means a high-risk global situation considering France’s NATO membership.

More than that, Russian intelligence recently discovered that around two thousand French soldiers are mobilized to be sent to Ukraine at any time. They are believed to be deployed in critical regions such as Odessa and the northern border, where the West fears the Russians will consolidate positions. Although it denies the information set out in the Russian report, the French government remains publicly willing to, “if necessary”, send troops to Ukraine, which is why tensions remain high.

Interestingly, the head of Ukrainian diplomacy, Dmitry Kuleba, stated that Russia misunderstood French plans. According to him, Macron ’s real intention is not to enter directly into the conflict, but only, “if necessary”, to allocate French instructors on Ukrainian soil so that they can train Kiev’s troops on the ground. In a scenario of military escalation and with logistical difficulties for Ukraine, some believe that this would be the best way to continue the current cooperation projects and training of Kiev’s forces by the West.

However, it is necessary to remember that at no point did Macron suggest that he was actually planning a mere sending of instructors. In his statements, the president actually said that he did not rule out the possibility of direct intervention in the war, making it clear that Paris could send troops to fight on the Ukrainian front line in the future. Furthermore, even if Macron said this incorrectly and his intention is only to send military trainers, this does not change the fact that Paris would, in practice, be going to war against Russia.

Western troops on Ukrainian soil are and will always be legitimate targets for Russian military forces. More than that, they are priority targets, as Moscow understands that these adversaries are the true strategists behind Ukrainian crimes. Several Western troops have already died in Ukraine — some of them acting as mercenaries, others as instructors or decision-makers. However, so far there is no official presence of these troops, which somehow still keeps tensions reasonably controlled.

From the moment a NATO country starts sending regular soldiers to Ukraine, even for mere instructional purposes, the crisis will escalate to an extremely serious, possibly irreversible, level. The official presence of Western troops in Ukraine would be a point of no return in ties between NATO and Russia, leading to an open WWIII — the consequences of which could be catastrophic.

There is also the risk that France and Europeans will simply be “abandoned” in this process. So far, the US, which is the leading country in NATO, has not shown any interest in direct intervention. For Washington, the most profitable scenario is the involvement of proxy agents in attritional conflicts that “wear down” Russia, without openly involving American troops. In this sense, it is very likely that, if France engages in an open war with Russia, there will be no direct American support for Paris and its European allies — after all, NATO’s collective defense obligations are not applicable when an alliance country begins hostilities against another state.

Indeed, Macron is acting in a totally risky and irresponsible way. In his selfish attempt to gain “leadership” among Europeans, the French president is leading the entire continent into an unprecedented security crisis.

March 22, 2024 - Posted by | Militarism | , , ,

2 Comments »

  1. If we once again wait to “see if that happens,” it will probably be too late to do anything about it. The time for a worldwide outcry, is now! The time to unify the peace movement in all countries, is now! The time to wake up to the fact that we are but “one step away from a full-scale World War Three,” is now!

    The Schiller Institute and the International Peace Coalition is on red alert mobilization, in every imaginable non-violent way, to make sure that the organized international outcry comes now, before it is too late. Participate in the IPC’s upcoming 43nd weekly meeting this Friday, March 29, at noon EDT, and organize all of your family, friends and contacts to do the same.

    https://schillerinstitute.com/blog/2024/03/14/international-experts-warn-of-danger-of-nuclear-war-today/

    Like

    Marty's avatar Comment by Marty | March 22, 2024 | Reply

  2. Macron is Joe Biden’s ventriloquist’s dummy. In the real world, France could not fight a war with Russia, either territorially or logistically as it no longer has the freedom (as with Napoleon) to march across Europe, let alone an army and munitions to take on the Russians. The only way it could be carried out is by lobbing ballistic missiles at each other, and France, being the smaller country, is not likely to come out of it too well.

    So the French are proxies for the Americans in Ukraine, and Macron is willing to let young French men die to keep the Yanks happy – and away from the battlefront.

    However, there is another way of looking at Macron’s behaviour. It should be remembered that he is a product of the WEF and undoubtedly pursuing the ‘Great Reset’, by which he is out to destroy France for his globalist masters. He tried with Covid, not as successfully as he would have liked, and now he is using Ukraine to achieve his goal of destroying the economy and killing as many citizens as possible, one way or the other, all under the guise of ‘protecting freedom and democracy’. Let’s hope the French people still have a guillotine or two ready.

    Like

    Bill Francis's avatar Comment by Bill Francis | March 22, 2024 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.