Mottaki: US, Britain behind region’s acts of terror
Press TV – March 8, 2010
Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki has charged that the United States and Britain are engaged in spreading terrorism in the region.
“The United States and Britain and their forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan are encouraging acts of terror in the region,” Mottaki said in an address to a regional conference in Tehran.
“Foreign (military) bases in our region have not been set up for stability and security purposes and military cooperation but are aimed at interfering in internal affairs of regional countries,” he added.
He warned regional countries to exercise vigilance making sure that “deals with foreign forces will not threaten regional security.”
The Iranian minister urged US officials to define the meaning of terrorism, saying, “They should speak about their links with terrorists, violation of rights in the name of human rights and their reason for keeping silent about the killing of human beings.”
Referring to the recent capture of the terrorist leader Abdolmalek Rigi by Iranian intelligence forces, Mottaki questioned reasons behind the presence of the terrorist leader in the US military base in Afghanistan.
On February 23, the leader of the Jundallah terrorist group was on a flight from the United Arab Emirates to Kyrgyzstan when he was tracked down by Iranian security forces.
Rigi and one of his deputies were captured after Iranian security forces forced their plane to land at an airport in the Persian Gulf city of Bandar Abbas.
Iranian security forces said he was at a US base in Afghanistan 24 hours before his capture.
In his confessions, Rigi revealed details about his ties with some intelligence agencies such as the CIA and said that he had closely cooperated with the security services of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Mottaki addressed arrogant powers, saying, “They are fomenting terrorism in the region while chanting anti-terrorism slogans. The Islamic Republic has long ago given warning against this danger.”
2 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Featured Video
The Motorist Uprising
or go to
Aletho News Archives – Video-Images
Book Excerpt
Why You Should Destroy Your Smart Phone Now
By Simon Elmer | OffGuardian | March 29, 2023
So-called ‘smart phones’ — far more accurately described as ‘dumb phones’ — combine a mobile phone with a watch, with a road map, with a tourist atlas of the world, with a digital camera, with a personal stereo system, with a music collection, with a video recorder, with a diary, with a calculator, with a credit card, with a travelcard, with an office key, with a torch, with a newspaper, with a television, with something to read on the train, and probably a lot more.
I don’t know, because I don’t own one.
‘But it’s so convenient!’ cry those who stare unbelieving at my twenty-year-old Nokia.
To which I reply: ‘Convenience breeds compliance.’ But to what?
Since they were first introduced into our lives in 2008, smartphones have become our outsourced memory and brain, replacing both with the convenience of not having to remember anything or think for ourselves. If you don’t believe me, then answer me this without looking at your smart phone. What is 9 x 13? What was the capital of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia? In what month of which year did the UK invade Iraq at the tail-end of the US-led coalition? Before smart phones, every child in the UK knew the answers to these questions. Now, no adult does.
But they are now even more than this. Smartphones, under the two years of lockdown, were the instrument onto which the COVID-faithful downloaded the software applications (or app) that connected them to the Test and Trace tracking programme that identified and recorded their location, movements, associations and personal contacts. … continue
Blog Roll
Recent Comments
VictorG. on The people who brought you the… Thomas Lee Simpson on China ready to boost military… Pip on Why You Should Destroy Your Sm… jbthring on Serious harms of the COVID-19… roberthstiver on China Urges US to Stop Interfe… itchyvet on China wants Nord Stream attack… michael on Israeli forces use Palestinian… jbthring on ICC irreversibly crosses the l… Thomas Lee Simpson on China wants Nord Stream attack… jbthring on THE ARRESTS MORE OR LESS REAL… Ant Lovato on Bulgaria refuses to send weapo… rediscover911com on Trudeau invokes “flat-earthers…
Aletho News- Florida will not extradite Trump – DeSantis March 31, 2023
- Whopping 82% Of Berlin’s Voters Refused To Support 2030 Climate Neutrality March 30, 2023
- Canada’s Conservative leader promises to repeal censorship bill if elected March 30, 2023
- Facebook ‘disappears’ RT Arabic March 30, 2023
- Contract shows how the FBI purchases massive amounts of online data March 30, 2023
- Russian central bank reveals how it braced for Western dollar grab March 30, 2023
- China ready to boost military cooperation with Russia March 30, 2023
- ‘Russia alone can already confront the entire West…’ March 30, 2023
- Burying key evidence, new OPCW report covers up Douma’s unsolved deaths March 30, 2023
- The people who brought you the Iraq war loudly support arming Ukraine. Where will this lead? March 30, 2023
- Syria reasserts its right to restore its sovereignty over Israeli-occupied Golan March 30, 2023
- Former CIA officer urges US to make Zelensky drop claims on Crimea and Donbass March 30, 2023
- Why You Should Destroy Your Smart Phone Now March 30, 2023
- The Motorist Uprising March 30, 2023
- Serious harms of the COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review March 30, 2023
- Ed Dowd’s Grim Accounting March 29, 2023
- Australian senators refuse to investigate the WHO pandemic treaty March 29, 2023
- China Urges US to Stop Interfering in Other Countries’ Affairs Under Pretext of Democracy March 29, 2023
- If Americans Knew
- Book Review: “The State of Israel vs The Jews” March 28, 2023
- Netanyahu’s covert operation to manipulate 2016 US election March 25, 2023
- Israeli hacking & disinfo team meddling in elections around the world March 24, 2023
- Brownstone Institute
- The Buck Stops Where? March 30, 2023
- Serious Harms of the Covid-19 Vaccine: A Systematic Review March 30, 2023
- Social Isolation Bad For Social Mammals – Who Knew? March 30, 2023
- The Contra Example of India’s Rejection of Indemnity for Pfizer March 29, 2023
- The Most Dangerous International Treaty Ever Proposed March 29, 2023
- The Inherent Deceit of Modern Medicine March 29, 2023
- Richie Allen
- Schools Not Telling Parents When Kids Switch Gender March 30, 2023
- Under Net Zero Plans Households Will Be Penalised For Sticking With Gas March 30, 2023
- 60% Of Scottish Trans Prisoners Began Transitioning After They Were Convicted March 28, 2023
- Change To This Week’s Schedule March 27, 2023
- Not A Lot Of People Know That
- Ross Clark: The EU’s Net Zero plan is in tatters – and not a moment too soon March 30, 2023
- Melting Antarctic ice will slow down a major global deep ocean current by 40% by 2050 March 30, 2023
- UK Govt’s green subsidy ‘reform’ punishes the poor and benefits the rich March 30, 2023
- Farmer Blenkiron March 30, 2023
- No Tricks Zone
- Consent Factory
- The Censorship Industrial Complex March 10, 2023
Aletho News 
One must presume then – from recent Islamic Republic of Iran Presidential and Foreign Ministry statements, that neither of these sections of the Iran government agree with the content of the US Public Law 107-243 “Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002”, as the stated reason (among others, in that document) that the Republic of Iraq was “a threat to peace and stability in the Persian Gulf region”. If indeed this presumption is correct, then one awaits an Islamic Republic confirmation of such position.
That the Islamic Republic did not view in Autumn of 2002 that the Republic of Iraq was a threat to peace and stability in the Persian Gulf Region. Further it would be interesting to be informed on which of the Persian Gulf littoral states actually did believe Iraq was a threat, because I am unable to logically figure this out!
LikeLike
One knows that “terrorism” is resulting from the abuse of the distinction between US Public Law legislative bills and US Private Law legislative bills, that, in Public Law bills one should not be able to identify private beneficiaries.
The mentioned in previous comment Public Law 107-243 is an example of a falsely labeled Public Law bill, where those interested in regime change in Iraq, were perceived as private beneficiaries of such bill’s enactment, but in fact where the bill had no basis in the US general public’s welfare or circumstance.
LikeLike