Aletho News


Losing It at the Airport Checkpoint

TSA’s War on the Bill of Rights

By RALPH NADER | June 25, 2010

If you are planning to fly over the 4th of July holiday, be aware of your rights at airport security checkpoints.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has mandated that passengers can opt out of going through a whole body scanning machine in favor of a physical pat down. Unfortunately, opting for the pat down requires passengers to be assertive since TSA screeners do not tell travelers about their right to refuse a scan. Harried passengers must spot the TSA signs posted at hectic security checkpoints to inform themselves of their rights before they move to a body scanning security line.

Since the failed Christmas Day bombing of a Northwest Airlines flight by a passenger hiding explosives in his underwear, TSA has accelerated its program of deploying whole body scanning machines, including x-ray scanners, at airport security checkpoints throughout the United States. Scanning machines peak beneath passengers’ clothing looking for concealed weapons and explosives that can elude airport metal detectors. So far, TSA has placed 111 scanners at 32 airports. They expect to have 450 scanners deployed by the end of the year at an estimated cost of $170,000 each.

Privacy, civil rights and religious groups object to whole body scanning machines as uniquely intrusive. Naked images of passengers’ bodies are captured by these machines that can reveal very personal medical conditions such as prosthetics, colostomy bags and mastectomy scars. The TSA responded by setting the scanners to blur the facial features of travelers, placing TSA employees who view the images in a separate room and assuring the public that the images are deleted after initial viewing.

Yet, a successful Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by the Electronic Privacy Information Center against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) uncovered documents showing that the scanning machines’ procurement specifications include the ability to store, record and transfer revealing digital images of passengers. The specifications allow TSA to disable any privacy filters permitting the exporting of raw images, contrary to TSA assurances.

It begs logic that the TSA would not retain their ability to store images particularly in the event of a terrorist getting through the scan and later attacking an aircraft. One of the first searches by the TSA would be to review images taken by the scanners to identify the attacker.

The Amsterdam airport is using a less intrusive security device called “auto detection” scanning which generates stick figures instead of the real image of the person and avoids exposing passengers to radiation. Three United States Senators recently wrote to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano urging her to consider these devices.

More pointedly, security experts, such as Edward Luttwak from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, have come forward questioning the effectiveness of whole body scanners since they can be defeated by hiding explosives in body cavities. The General Accounting Office, an investigative arm of Congress, has stated that it is unclear whether scanners would have spotted the kind of explosives carried by the “Christmas Day” bomber.

About one-half of these body scanning machines use low dose x-rays to scan passengers. Last May, a group of esteemed scientists from the University of California, San Francisco wrote to John Holdren, President Obama’s science adviser, voicing their concerns about the rapid roll out of scanners without a rigorous safety review by an impartial panel of experts. The scientists caution that the TSA has miscalculated the radiation dose to the skin from scanners and that there is “good reason to believe that these scanners will increase the risk of cancer to children and other vulnerable populations.”

David Brenner, director of Columbia University’s Center for Radiological Research, has also voiced caution about x-raying millions of air travelers. He was a member of the government committee that set the safety guidelines for the x-ray scanners, and he now says he would not have signed onto the report had he known that TSA wanted to scan almost every air traveler.

Passenger complaints to TSA and newspaper accounts of passenger experiences with scanners contradict TSA assurances that checkpoint signs provide adequate notice to travelers about the scanning procedure and the pat down option. Travelers, who reported that they were not fully aware what the scanning procedure involved, said they were not made aware of alternative search options.

Many travelers complained about their privacy, and their families’ privacy, being invaded. Some were concerned about the radiation risk, particularly to pregnant women and children. Some travelers felt bullied by rude TSA screeners. The Wall Street Journal reported that one woman who refused to go through the body scanner was called “unpatriotic” by the TSA screener.

Expensive state-of-the-art security technology that poses potentially serious health risks to vulnerable passengers, invades privacy, and provides questionable security is neither smart nor safe. For the White House it is a political embarrassment waiting to happen.

President Obama should suspend the body scanning program and appoint an independent panel of experts to review the issues of privacy, health and effectiveness. After such a review, should the DHS and TSA still want to deploy body scanners at airports, they should initiate a public rulemaking, which they have refused thus far, so that the public can have their say in the matter.

If you experience any push-back from TSA screeners when you assert your right to refuse to go through a whole body scanner and request a pat down security search instead, please write to

June 25, 2010 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Full Spectrum Dominance


  1. Meanwhile, back at the world’s current catastrophe…


    Comment by KnowThyTruth | June 25, 2010

  2. If only someone would organize a ONE DAY protest and have

    EVERY airport traveler REFUSE to be SCANNED?

    Travelers MUST organize to assert their RIGHTS!

    NO Doctor will tell a PREGNANT woman it’s safe to be scanned


    Comment by Baja Joes | June 25, 2010

  3. Don’t look for any suspension of scanners. Remember Chertoff, the former DHS head chief? He conveniently is contracted with the federales to supply…screeners. Hey, he’s just making a buck right?


    Comment by robertsgt40 | June 25, 2010

  4. P.S. I stopped flying about five years ago.


    Comment by robertsgt40 | June 25, 2010

  5. This is beyound belief. Did the Nazi’s take over TSA?

    Joe Boss has a good take on TSA.




    Comment by Wally F | June 25, 2010

  6. […] Losing It at the Airport Checkpoint – by Ralph Nader Posted on June 25, 2010 by Orwell's Dreams TSA’s War on the Bill of Rights By RALPH NADER |If you are planning to fly over the 4th of July holiday, be aware of your rights at airport security checkpoints. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has mandated that passengers can opt out of going through a whole body scanning machine in favor of a physical pat down. Unfortunately, opting for the pat down requires passengers to be assertive since TSA screeners do not t … Read More […]


    Pingback by Losing It at the Airport Checkpoint – by Ralph Nader « Orwell's Dreams | June 25, 2010

  7. The only right you have at airport checkpoints is to Ben Dover and spread em! They have all the power, and control

    I committed the heinous crime of having deep pockets in my pants that made it possible for me to miss a ‘nickel’ in my pants when I pulled my change out to put it in the little plastic tray.

    I walked thru again and it went off. they wanded me. I pulled the nickel out. the TSA guy smirked and I said; “oh no, you’re not going to body search me for this, are you??” and he said; “we have no choice now..”

    so, I consented to the ‘body search’ in plain view of others in the line. They made me sit down. I had to have my testicles fondled, which if it’d been a cute female, I might not have minded. Instead, it was a limp wristed pervy looking TSA fucker. I said; “oh yea, could you do the left one again…please!!” and now I was in real trouble.

    ten minutes later I was absolved of my ‘nickel’ threat, but in the meantime, my ‘new’ laptop had a deep gouge in it’s cover. retaliation for my cocky reply back to the a-hole!

    they have all the power. best you can do is change your name to Ben Dover. I’m sure he’s not on the NO FLY LIST!!


    Comment by What Rights??? | June 26, 2010

  8. I worry that outrage will continue to grow until we reach a flash point. I’m picturing the huge travel period around the winter holiday, with large airports filled with tired, annoyed, frustrated people, with new, intrusive, offensive procedures in place. I have to admit I’m *very* glad I’m not going anywhere near an airport this year.


    Comment by Tracey Newton | November 23, 2010

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.