Aletho News


George Stephanopoulos Thinks Iran is Enriching Weapons-Grade Uranium

By Nima Shirazi | Wide Asleep in America | September 30, 2013

Iran’s new foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif appeared on ABC‘s “This Week” and addressed a number of the same questions every Iranian official is asked again and again in interviews by the American media.

George Stephanopoulos, who effectively conducted the same interview with former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad three years in a row, asked Zarif about possible concessions Iran is willing to make over its nuclear program. By doing so, however, he revealed that he knows very little about Iran’s domestic enrichment program and the consistent findings of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

In response to Zarif’s comment that, for negotiations to be successful, Iran’s inalienable right to enrich uranium be recognized and sanctions begin to be lifted, Stephanopoulos countered, “I understand that’s your demand. But in return, is Iran prepared to stop enriching uranium at the levels they are now enriching it?”

Iran, under strict IAEA safeguards, round-the-clock surveillance and regular intrusive inspection, is currently enriching UF6 (uranium hexafluoride feedstock) to between 3.5% and 5% U-235 for use as fuel in nuclear power plants and to just under 20% U-235 for use in medical research reactors. Both 5% and 20% enriched uranium are considered “low-enriched uranium” (LEU). Neither of these enrichment levels are close to the minimum of 90% U-235, or high-enriched uranium (HEU), needed to produce nuclear bombs.

Not only this, but Iran has been systematically converting its roughly 20% LEU into U3O8 (triuranium octoxide) metallic fuel plates for its research reactor, thus precluding the material’s further enrichment to weapons-grade and decreasing its accumulating stockpile, thus deliberately reducing the potential threat of proliferation. Nuclear physicist Yousaf Butt has explained, “This conversion essentially freezes the enrichment level and subtracts from the ‘enrichable’ gaseous stockpile used in centrifuges. It is not something that a nation hell-bent on weaponization would do.”

The Tehran Research Reactor, where these fuel plates are used, produces radioisotopes required to diagnose and treat more than 850,000 cancer patients across the country.

In short, Iran is not – and has never even been accused or suspected of – enriching weapons-grade uranium.

Yet, as Stephanopoulos’ interview with Zarif continued, it became increasingly clear the ABC host thinks it is.

When Zarif noted that, while “various aspects of Iranian’s enrichment program” are open to negotiation, Iran’s “right to enrich is nonnegotiable,” Stephanopoulos replied, “But you don’t need to enrich above 20 percent, which is only used for military purposes.”

Zarif explained, “We do not need military-grade uranium. That’s a certainty and we will not move in that direction.”

Stephanopoulos, after asking if Iran would ever allow “surprise inspections” of its nuclear facilities – something Iran already does – was told forthrightly by Zarif that Iran has absolutely no interest in producing nuclear weapons.

“We’re not seeking nuclear weapons… We don’t want nuclear weapons,” the Iranian Foreign Minister said, echoing decades of official Iranian policy. “We believe nuclear weapons are detrimental to our security. We believe those who have the illusion that nuclear weapons provide them with security are badly mistaken. We need to have a region and a world free from nuclear weapons.”

What was Stephanopoulos’ response? This:

“But if you don’t want nuclear weapons why enrich uranium to the levels you’re enriching uranium?,” he wondered.

Again, Iran is not enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels, so Stephanopoulos’ question makes no sense. Next time, perhaps, he’ll ask one of the hundreds of thousands of Iranians suffering from cancer why they think their government is enriching uranium to the levels it does.

With media personalities like Stephanopoulos, it is no wonder that the American public remains misinformed and mislead on basic facts about Iran’s nuclear program.

October 1, 2013 - Posted by | Deception, Mainstream Media, Warmongering | , , , , ,


  1. George Stephanopoulis was also seen in attendance at one of the Bilderberg gatherings.

    Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:50:48 +0000 To:


    Comment by Jack Dunn | October 1, 2013

  2. Stephanopoulos’ purpose is not to ask intelligent questions but to elicit emotional, intemperate, angry or frustrated responses including body language from his interviewee which when divorced from the “interview” context can be applied in the production of psyop propaganda for targeting domestic Iranian popular perception of their leaders as dupes as well as for characterizing Iran’s leaders in the USA and Israel as an imperious hate-filled military ruling caste. The function of the loyal mainstream media is to sex-up the narrative to provide justifying pretext for the strategic outcome –obliteration of Iran’s opposition unipolar globalization. Opposition to unipolar globalization is not evil, and would likely be the keystone iconic element of modern americanism –if Zionism and Neo-conservatism were not welded to the totalitarian expansion of financial power over public power and the limits to growth. Globalization is the end-game of political power and it is to socialism, democracy, conservatism and nationalism what paper is to rock in the absence of public scissors. Michael\\


    Comment by Michael\\ | October 1, 2013

  3. step’s purpose like all tv/radio/print mouthers is to lie and deceive.


    Comment by 5 dancing shlomos | October 1, 2013

  4. Who is George Stephanopoulos? Does anyone in their right mind watch Israeli controlled “mainstream” media? The pro-Israel, anti-Islam propaganda is LAUGHABLE. They are actively COVERING-UP Israels’ involvement in the 9/11 false-flag hoax. They need to charged with TREASON.


    Comment by Goliath | October 2, 2013

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.