Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Winston Churchill was a Racist Ass#*%!

Moonlit History | October 24, 2014

ch

Churchill is seen as the British icon of endurance and strength through gloomy war. His drowning voice of “we shall fight on the beaches” is easily identifiable with World War II. And he was a complete drunk.

But what do common folks now-a-days know of this man? Do you know much about Dear ol’ Churchill? Let’s find out.

In December of 1910, while young Churchill was Home Secretary, he wrote:

“The unnatural and increasingly rapid growth of the Feeble-Minded and Insane classes, coupled as it is with a steady restriction among all the thrifty, energetic and superior stocks, constitutes a national and race danger which it is impossible to exaggerate. I am convinced that the multiplication of the Feeble-Minded, which is proceeding now at an artificial rate, unchecked by any of the old restraints of nature, and actually fostered by civilised conditions, is a terrible danger to the race.” Churchill was all-for forcing “feeble-minded” people to labour colonies. January 19, 1899, Churchill wrote in a letter to his cousin: “The improvement of the British breed is my aim of life.” [1]

Wait a minute, he was in favor of eugenics? This sounds really familiar to someone else in history, I just can’t remember his name. Anyway, moving on.

As a young MP, it was well-known he believed that “the Aryan stock is bound to triumph.” — Okay, wait! He sounds just like that guy with the funny mustache! Whoa!

When concentration camps were built in South Africa, for white Boers, he [Churchill] said they produced “the minimum of suffering”. The death toll was almost 28,000, and when at least 115,000 black Africans were likewise swept into British camps, where 14,000 died, he wrote only of his “irritation that Kaffirs should be allowed to fire on white men.”

As Colonial Secretary in the 1920s, he unleashed the notorious Black and Tan thugs on Ireland’s Catholic civilians, and when the Kurds rebelled against British rule, he said: “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes… [It] would spread a lively terror.” [2]

And after Ghandi’s movement of peace was taking hold in the then British colony of India, Churchill was noted to have said:

“I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.” Churchill’s gross demeanor towards others not of his skin did not cease while the Bengali famine occurred (which led to the death of nearly 3 million souls). He remarked the famine was not Britain’s fault, but it was “their” fault—because they “breed like rabbits.” He was talking about the Indians, of course. Amartya Sen, an economist who won the Nobel Prize in 1998, proved for a fact that the famine was due to the imperialist structure of the British Empire. [3]

In conclusion: make your own conclusion.

Sources:
[1] Winstonchurchill.org
[2] The Independent
[3] BBC

November 9, 2014 - Posted by | Ethnic Cleansing, Militarism, Timeless or most popular, War Crimes | , , , , , ,

8 Comments »

  1. Tell us something new… everyone knows, can know, should know, that he was a racist, a bigot, a anti-european and an anti-semite!
    It is a known fact that he told his secretary that he agreed with the anger of hitler towards the black winner OG in 1939, as well as that he knew of the death-camps but didn’t want to bomb them simply because he hated the jews and considered it a solution, he did oppose homosexuals in the army, he was the one who opposed granting medal to the decryptor because the man was a homosexual, he wanted to end any cooperation on the European continent, he created borders in the Middle East that turned out better for the UK then for anyone else… Churchill was a disaster!

    Like

    masteradrian's avatar Comment by masteradrian | November 9, 2014 | Reply

  2. Reblogged this on Floating-voter.

    Like

    joekano76's avatar Comment by joekano76 | November 9, 2014 | Reply

  3. Reblogged this on LIBYA AGAINST SUPER POWER MEDIA.

    Like

    alfatah69's avatar Comment by alfatah69 | November 10, 2014 | Reply

  4. Re, 1 comment, by, masteradrian, I having been born in the lower classes, reflecting my experience of the working class comments, when I was young, they seemed to love Churchill, to my mind he was a bastard, and relished infantry being slaughtered on the front line as a way of murdering in a legal method of execution, the working class, it is difficult to understand how the working class to the extent they liked Churchill, I believe, on the radio, his speeches,would be aroused by his rhetoric of hope, one must remember the war produced much propaganda, that would indoctrinate the classes, as today, the same process works.
    We must remember the importance of the expendables, that is in the main the working class, is they are a group who keep the wealthy, wealthy, they pay taxes on national debts, such as war costs, banking collapse, and so on, and also they produce services such as killing or maiming people who are classed as terrorists or some other label that is not part of our identity as a proper citizen, that we choose to call us.
    Besides the elite, such as what Churchill, is, in this town I live in, I have noticed a growing number, of what appears as a lower in terms of socio/economic, status, having expressions of self, as a large part of their head and face is covered with tattoo’s, body piecing such as penetration of earlobes, here many piercings, are hole, some 20mm, wide, or more, the metal around lips, eyebrows and so on, is to me a desperate attempt to find their identity, for many this expression does little to enhance the attitude of the ruling elite, to think these people are not us, we can give them a sense of personal identity by putting them in a war zone, many of these people will return with, ptsd, or no legs, or what ever, this gives the individual a sense of their boundaries, and a new sense of being in the world with a bonus of a challenge,for many, the sacrifice albeit, is seen as a virtue, as we see these casualties, I almost thought freaks, with no legs or whatever extolling the admirable quality of having done their bit for the country, puzzling, but thought by some, as a necessity.

    Like

    donwreford's avatar Comment by donwreford | November 10, 2014 | Reply

    • Perhaps they seek to be a part of the racist supremacy that Churchill oozes. Even while accepting their inferior class status at least they are of a superior nation, and the act of committing sanctioned murder is their proof of some part of the supremacy even if it costs them their sanity or their bodily integrity.

      Living under a class structure robs us of much more than material comforts.

      Like

      aletho's avatar Comment by aletho | November 10, 2014 | Reply

      • I am not certain what you mean by a superior nation? do you mean, superior tooling? my point here is they had by chance the ingredients to make material objects like guns, the spirituality of the elite of Britain, which I think are foreigners, such as the British Queen, who is in bad faith, which explains her remoteness, She of course being a a symbol of divinity is similar to the Japanese, old Royals.
        The financiers settled in to Britain through Cromwell, to maintain power over the British public, the British government had no other choice than to oppress its so called, own kind, from a early time violence became common, such as the press gangs, the rest is history,

        Like

        donwreford's avatar Comment by donwreford | November 11, 2014 | Reply

        • I really should have placed quotation marks around the word superior.

          Like

          aletho's avatar Comment by aletho | November 11, 2014 | Reply


Leave a reply to joekano76 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

« Previous | Next »