Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

The New State Department Report on Hillary’s Email, and Why it Matters

By Peter Van Buren | We Meant Well | May 27, 2016

The State Department Inspector General’s (IG) investigation report leaked out a day early on May 25 makes a number of significant points. These matter, and need to be considered by anyone voting in November.

What’s in the IG Report

— Neither Clinton nor any of her senior staff would participate in the IG’s investigation.

— Clinton never sought approval, legal or technical, for her unprecedented private email system.

— IT staffers and others at State warned her against it.

— Had she sought approval, the State Department would not have granted it.

— Clinton violated Federal Records laws.

— Clinton did not turn over all of her work-related emails. Several (unclassified) were quoted in the IG report that had never been released.

— Clinton violated State Department policies and guidelines in place at the time, even as the State Department enforced those on the rank-and-file.

— IT staff at the State Department who raised concerns internally were falsely told the server was approved and ordered to not discuss it further.

— Clinton’s use of a non-standard email account caused many of her emails to not reach their recipients inside State, and ended up instead in Spam.

— State Department staffers not in Clinton’s inner circle aware of her private email address could not communicate with the head of their agency.

— His State Department bosses did not know their employee, Bryan Pagliano, was simultaneously working directly for Clinton maintaining her private server.

— The server came under severe enough hacker attacks that its administrator had to physically unplug it to prevent intrusions.

The question of classified material handling is, by agreement, being left by State to the FBI, and is thus not addressed in the IG report.

All of that is in the report. I’ve read the whole thing, and if you do not believe my summary, above, or wonder what specific laws and regulations are being cited, you can also read the whole thing and learn for yourself.

What Matters

— For the first time, a set of actual facts of Clinton’s actions and decisions have been laid out by an independent, government entity. The IG was appointed by Obama and his report is dispassionate. No one can realistically claim this is a hit job. Sources are cited and laws footnoted.

— Clinton did break Federal Records laws and violate State Department regulations that her organization held others to.

— Despite repeated promises of transparency and cooperation, neither Hillary nor any of her senior staff would agree to participate in the IG’s investigation. Former Sectaries of State Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright did participate fully and voluntarily in the investigation. Clinton alone did not.

— Clinton never sought approval, and ignored advice to stop what she was doing. She ran the server with no oversight. With no oversight, the only check on Clinton was Clinton herself.

— That lack of oversights extended to potential destruction of evidence. It was Clinton alone who determined which emails to turn over to the State Department as “work related” and which to delete, some 30,000. It was Clinton who made the decision to then try and wipe the server clean. It is unclear whether or not the FBI can forensically retrieve and review those 30,000 deleted emails.

Simply put, what she did wasn’t supposed to be done.

Why It Matters

— Hillary Clinton lied when she claimed her actions were approved. She lied when she said there were no regulations in place at the time of her server decisions. She lied when she said she broke no laws. She lied when she said this all was a Republican hit job. She lied when she said she would cooperate with any investigation.

— Hillary Clinton covered up her actions for four years as Secretary, then another two years after she left office, and only admitted to anything after it hit the news last year.

— Hillary Clinton asks voters to trust her with the most important job in America. She has not shown she is trustworthy.

— Hillary Clinton asks to be America’s leader. She did not lead her State Department, and she showed contempt for its rules. She did not lead by example.

— Hillary Clinton made clear by her actions that she believes rules that apply to others do not apply to her.

— Hillary Clinton by her actions succeeded in hiding all of her official emails from the Freedom of Information Act for six years in open contempt for that process and the American people.

— Hillary Clinton purposefully and willfully created a system that exempted her from the oversight applied to every other government employee.

— Hillary Clinton alone in the entire U.S. government conducted 100% of her official business on a private email server.

Defense?

The other shoe has yet to drop. Though the Inspectors General from the intelligence community have stated unequivocally that Clinton did handle highly classified material on her unsecured server, the FBI report on the same matter has not yet been released.

For those who wish to defend Clinton with the “but everybody did it” argument, Condoleezza Rice did not send any emails on any unsecured system at all. Powell and Albright sent a handful in the early days of the web. All of them cooperated in the State IG investigation. None of them ran a fully private system for four years and most importantly, none of them are asking us to trust them now running for president.

If your support is whittle down to a sad Hillary is down to “well, she’s not Trump,” do be careful what you wish for. She’s not Trump, but she is all of the above.

For those who wish to defend Clinton by saying “she’s not indicted,” well, actual criminality is a pretty low bar to set for the most important job in America. Also, the FBI has yet to release its report which may point to actual national security violations.

And lastly, it is not about crime per se, but about trust and judgement.

BONUS: If Bernie Sanders will not discuss any of this publically, he does not want to be president.

May 29, 2016 - Posted by | Corruption, Deception, Timeless or most popular | ,

6 Comments »

  1. An excellent overview. HClinton, as improbable as it seems, is the “worse worse” of the HClinton-DTrump duet of duopoly disasters. Dr. Jill Stein continues to be my candidate, although Gary Johnson and his Libertarians are making some interesting noises…but nyet to him/them. (Sanders? too old, and he’s a Jewish Zionist. Biden? heaven forbid; remember “I am a Zionist”?)

    Like

    roberthstiver's avatar Comment by roberthstiver | May 29, 2016 | Reply

    • Sad to say, but Jill Stein is also a Jewish Zionist. When she ran for president last time, she jettisoned the US Green Party’s overwhelmingly adopted position on boycotts and divestment from Israel as well as the party’s platform calling for a one state solution. Her plan was to sit both sides down and “force” them to make peace. As a long time Green Party member, I can only explain this as various Zionist elements infiltrating and weakening the party. They are also probably a big part of the reason for alienating the most viable and honorable candidate the party ever had – Arab American Ralph Nader. I am not sure if Jill Stein is motivated by Zionism or really does want to advance other aspects of the Green agenda but just can’t get past privileging Israel, Cynthia McKinney was also an amazingly respectable candidate – just not with the same name recognition as Ralph Nader. However, when she was running, the national Green Paper called”Green Pages” undermined her strong stand for justice in Palestine by publishing (I believe front page) an article about an exchange trip with Green CA officials to Israel – (in other words, what boycott? ) That was largely orchestrated by Michael Feinstein – an exceptionally undemocratic fellow within the party when it comes to protecting his beloved Israel.

      There are great, principled people in the Green Party – they just get undermined by frauds and manipulators. It is super easy to disrupt the Green Party, particularly at the National level.

      PS Her platform this time says:
      “US policy regarding Israel and Palestine must be revised to prioritize international law, peace and human rights for all people, no matter their religion or nationality. End US policies that have supported the worst tendencies of the Israeli government in its treatment of the people of Palestine. ”

      There is a further statement on “US Foreign Policy, Palestine-Israel, and BDS.” She does claim support for BDS this time, although never mentions the right of return explicitly and couches it as one of many countries that need to change including Saudia Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt. No mention of the extra special relationship that the pro-Israel lobby has with congress – just that the US has been supporting all of this for some reason, but now we are just going to reverse it despite all of congress being for Israel…

      May be good enough for you and is better than most, but I don’t trust that she really respects Palestinians or the Green Party. On a great many other issues she is quite good, and she claims to support BDS now, but just as with Bernie, it is hard to trust. Obama said a lot of nice things too, afterall,

      Like

      4justice's avatar Comment by 4justice | May 30, 2016 | Reply

      • Perhaps you could consider expanding your comment to an article for posting.

        Alternative politics is all just spinning of wheels unless the focus is on prevention of Zionist influence from the outset.

        Anything short of vigilance is simply deception and collusion.

        Like

        aletho's avatar Comment by aletho | May 30, 2016 | Reply

      • Thanks, 4justice, for a comprehensive, thought-provoking comment! Sigh — do I just sit out this election or leave the POTUS line blank? I do acknowledge, of course, that even if Dr. Stein were the staunch anti-Zionists we obviously are and a miracle happened come November, Congress, the executive bureaucracy, the presstitutes et al would pillory her and prevent any forward motion on Palestine or any other Green position. (As an aside, I wonder about Bernie: if he were somehow able to garner the Dem candidacy [HC being such an indictable criminal…], can one imagine how the rightwing “capitalist” regulars would go into overdrive to bellow and bluster about his — gasp! — socialist ideas and “commie” inclinations? Such alone would guarantee his non-election in “free market” Amerika….) P.s. Amen to your nice comment about Ralph Nader, whom I met only one time–2004; his intellect and grasp were so obviously far above my level!

        Like

        roberthstiver's avatar Comment by roberthstiver | May 30, 2016 | Reply

  2. How about a ‘pots and pans’ demonstration? People stand on their front porches every Sunday evening at 8pm and bang together pots and pans–yelling “I’m mad as hell, and not going to stand this circus any more!”

    If angels were as organized as the criminals, the problems would be widely recognized and confronted. http://911JusticeCampaign.org

    Like

    rediscover911com's avatar Comment by rediscover911com | May 30, 2016 | Reply

    • Stimulating thought, rediscover911, but I think it would be more effective for Jimmy Carter, Fritz Hollings, James Aboureszk, Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney, Paul Craig Roberts, Ray McGovern, Phil Giraldi and at least 50 other principled Americans to bang their pots and pans, daily for many days, on the steps of the Capitol in Zio-Occupied WashDC. Perhaps once the MSM were forced to acknowledge their presence and provide some long-overdue context, the movement would extend into middle America….

      Like

      roberthstiver's avatar Comment by roberthstiver | May 30, 2016 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.