Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Grenfell: Plastic firms helped write climate-related safety rules

Tall Bloke’s Talk Shop | November 27, 2017

Insulation added to buildings like the ill-fated Grenfell Tower was a result of climate regulations, as this extract from a Sky News report shows. But the manufacturers themselves helped write those rules, and now some critics who tried to point out potential fire hazards in the materials say they were subjected to intimidation by them.

While legal threats were being made in private, the plastic insulation industry was openly advertising its role in writing the rules that govern the fitting of its products to millions of buildings across the country.

The main lobby group for the plastic insulation trade was, until November 2017, called the British Rigid Urethane Foam Manufacturers’ Association [BRUFMA].

Partly in response to Grenfell Tower – or what it refers to as “events of this year” – BRUFMA changed its name to the Insulation Manufacturers Association.

They advertise that they are “influencing UK and local government, specifying authorities, relevant approval and certification bodies,” and have “high level involvement in the drafting and regular revision of British and European standards [and] the Building Regulations.” Its members are promised the “opportunity to influence Government bodies and NGOs” and “direct input into relevant British Standards committees.”

How that influence works in practice is exposed by examination of government efforts to meet the UK’s climate change commitments. Since the Kyoto agreement in 1997 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, successive governments have created rules about how new and refurbished buildings must be insulated to reduce heat loss.

In 2011 the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) turned to the insulation industry for help, inviting representatives onto a Green Deal committee to come up with ways to push more insulation into homes. We discovered that of the 10 firms and construction industry groups on that committee, four were members of BRUFMA.

One of them was Celotex, the firm whose plastic insulation would be fitted to the outside of Grenfell Tower four years later.

November 27, 2017 - Posted by | Corruption, Science and Pseudo-Science, Timeless or most popular |

1 Comment »

  1. If only the Twin Towers had been clad with this material. It may have covered up the obvious puffs of smoke which indicated the ‘explosions’ that could clearly be seen, as the towers were demolished, story by story, resulting in the CONTROLLED DEMOLITION of those buildings on “9/11”
    The Grenfell building, clearly made to British building standards(unlike, inferior, American standards)……(and YES, I’m being provocative), remained STANDING after the massive internal fire(as opposed to the “Small office Fires” which destroyed Tower 7)
    Sorry, but, the older I get, the more OBVIOUS it is that Huge Skyscrapers, DO NOT collapse because of ‘fires’…….

    Like

    Brian Harry, Australia's avatar Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | November 28, 2017 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

« Previous | Next »