Aletho News


Dennis Kucinich Hit with Spurious Criticism over Fox News Connection

By Adam Dick | Ron Paul Institute | February 1, 2018

A recent poll places Dennis Kucinich, who announced his run for Ohio governor on January 17, in second place among five Democratic primary contenders. When you are doing well in an election, like appears to be the case with Kucinich, you can expect attacks, including attacks based on deception, to start coming at you.

Ed Kilgore, in a Monday New York Magazine article, criticized Kucinich’s work as a Fox News contributor between Kucinich leaving the United States House of Representatives in 2013 and announcing his governor candidacy this month. Kilgore asserts Kucinich’s work with Fox News involved “steady criticism of the Obama administration’s hostility to Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian regime” and “turned more sinister as Donald Trump began his climb toward the presidency, with the former lefty gadfly often expressing agreement with the mogul’s anti-globalist rhetoric.” Further, Kilgore writes, Kucinich agreed in a Fox News interview in May that President Trump was then under attack from the deep state in the intelligence community.

Here are the facts. Kucinich has long been a supporter of nonintervention overseas. That includes in Syria. Over his 16 years in the House as a Democratic representative from Ohio, Kucinich opposed US “regime change” efforts and wars no matter the political party affiliations of the president and congressional leadership pushing such. Kucinich has also long been an opponent of so-called globalist policies in the form of huge international trade deals.

Kucinich, who served in Congress as a Democrat and is now running for Ohio governor in that party’s primary, has not been a party-line guy who follows leadership orders and blindly joins in whatever attacks are being hurled at people in the opposing political party. If, in his judgement, he sees a Republican is being unfairly attacked, do not be surprised to see Kucinich defend the Republican or at least refrain from joining in the attack.

Indeed, Kucinich’s independence has enabled him to consistently take his stands against foreign intervention and huge trade deals even when his party leadership supported the opposite.

On these issues, as well as others including opposing the USA PATRIOT Act, Kucinich would work with like-minded Republicans in the House. Among them was then-Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX). In fact, Paul was so impressed by his interactions with Kucinich that, when Paul decided to found the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity (RPI) after leaving the House, Paul invited Kucinich to join the institute’s Advisory Board. Kucinich accepted the invitation and spoke at the 2013 event announcing the institute’s formation as well as at RPI’s 2017 annual conference.

In his speech at the 2013 RPI inaugural event, Kucinich said, “I’m shoulder to shoulder with Ron Paul in being concerned about how war enables the state to become more powerful; and, as a result, it deprives our citizens not only of economic vitality, but also of civil liberties.” Continuing, Kucinich expressed that RPI “has so much importance because it will provide a place for people to gather from across the political spectrum so that we can as Americans address our common concerns about freedom, about peace, about prosperity, and, in doing so, help to rescue our country from a trajectory that it’s on right now that can only lead to our destruction.”

Kucinich, in making these comments at the event, is not saying that he has become a libertarian like Paul or that he agrees with Paul on every issue. Instead, Kucinich is saying that he desires to work on a group of important matters with people who agree with him on those matters even if those individuals’ views on other matters differ very much from his. In this case, the common ground is expressed at the RPI website as “advocacy for a peaceful foreign policy and the protection of civil liberties at home.”

Similarly, Kucinich having worked as a contributor at Fox News does not mean he is or ever was in lockstep agreement with, say, Fox News host Sean Hannity. Instead, Kucinich at Fox expressed his own views on matters, just as an opinion columnist with a “left,” “right,” or whatever political orientation does so at a newspaper that generally has a different editorial viewpoint.

In fact, appearing on Fox News or Fox Business, Kucinich could potentially make a bigger impact than he would if he had chosen to work with a media company that is more closely aligned with his political views. At Fox, Kucinich was not preaching to the choir. Instead, he was communicating to an audience a large percentage of whose members were unfamiliar with or antagonistic to his thoughts on many issues.

Indeed, Kucinich alludes to his work with Fox News in a new interview at WOSU radio of Columbus, Ohio as helping contribute to his ability to win the Ohio governor general election for just this reason. “How do you court Republicans? How do you court the small government voters who propelled Trump to victory?” Steve Brown asks Kucinich in the interview. Answers Kucinich in part: “Because for the last five years I’ve had the ability to stand in the same position that I’ve always took on the floor of the House and to communicate with a constituency that most Democrats never get a chance to talk to.”

Suppose Kucinich is right. Suppose he can reach across party lines in the general election, leading to his winning the governorship. That prospect, combined with his apparent strength so far in the Democratic primary, is sure to draw out more criticisms of Kucinich. Expect more criticism, including criticism that, like the criticism of Kucinich for having worked with Fox News, may sound incriminating on a first hearing but is based on no more than misleading innuendo and fallacious guilt by association.

February 1, 2018 - Posted by | Mainstream Media, Warmongering | ,


  1. Kucinich is what Bernie Sanders pretends to be.


    Comment by I Speak | February 2, 2018 | Reply

    • Sanders has always been an imperialist/Zionist/militarist. He has not done much pretending otherwise.

      The fulsome support he has gotten from “progressives” is simply evidence of the thin separation between them and the neocons.

      Sanders’ current Russiagate blathering shows him as the greater evil when compared with Trump.


      Comment by aletho | February 2, 2018 | Reply

      • Agreed!

        And I can’t stand that self-congratulatory term, “progressive”. The ABC radio here in Australia (the little brother of the BBC) pushes that term frequently as something positive. That’s a sure sign that’s it’s not positive, as far as I’m concerned.


        Comment by I Speak | February 2, 2018 | Reply

  2. Fox News is like a casino in that they tilt the odds in their own favor. And, like a casino, if one of their opponents wins big they know it’s not really big in the long run, so they’re happy to advertise their opponents’ wins because that will attract more viewers consuming their overall slanted message.

    I remember when Reza Aslan scored huge on Fox by exposing the host’s foolishness. (The host asked why a Muslim would write about Jesus, with the attitude that his faith disqualifies his scholarship.) All the celebrations by the Fox haters reminded me of the lights and bells that go off at a casino when someone hits a jackpot. Aslan and his celebrators did Fox and their agenda a favor. I can’t agree with anybody playing their game, even if they “win”.

    The neocon/neoliberal agenda that Fox supports has the backing of the Federal Reserve System. Every central bank in the world tilts the economy in favor of whomever they want. They want neocons and neoliberals, like Fox News. We the people are in a really bad spot.

    I like Dennis Kucinich’s message. I don’t have a solution to better get that message out. It seems like the good messengers have a choice: drink the slow-acting poison or the fast-acting poison. I suppose forgoing Fox’s platform, with no other platform available, is the fast acting poison, and using Fox’s platform is the slow poison.

    Sorry for the negativity. I pretty much lost hope when I saw that Jill Stein couldn’t so much as get 5% of the vote (I think that number is about right despite the failed recount), which I took as an indication that there will be no pro-people movement anytime soon. I’ll still watch the gubernatorial primaries in Ohio and Michigan (where El-Sayed is promoting pro-people policies) with my fingers crossed.


    Comment by Matt | February 2, 2018 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.