Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Death Knell For Syria Pullout: “We Have To Protect Israel” Says Trump

By Tyler Durden – Zero Hedge – 02/03/2019

After approaching two months of talk of a “full” and “immediate” US troop withdrawal from Syria, first ordered by President Trump on December 19 — which was predictably met with swift and fierce pushback from beltway hawks including in some cases his own advisers — it now appears the death knell has sounded on the prior “complete” and “rapid” draw down order.

Trump said in a CBS “Face the Nation” interview this weekend that some unspecified number of US troops will remain in the region, mostly in Iraq, with possibly some still in Syria, in order “to protect Israel” in what appears a significant backtrack from his prior insistence on an absolute withdrawal.

“We’re going to be there and we’re going to be staying. We have to protect Israel,” he replied when pressed by CBS reporter Margaret Brennan. “We have to protect other things that we have. But we’re – yeah, they’ll be coming back in a matter of time.” He did note that “ultimately some will be coming home.”

“Look, we’re protecting the world,” he added. “We’re spending more money than anybody’s ever spent in history, by a lot.” Trump’s slow drift and change in tune on the subject of a promised “rapid” exit comes after Israeli officials led by Prime Minister Netanyahu alongside neocon allies in Washington argued that some 200 US troops in Syria’s southeast desert along the Iraqi border and its 55-kilometer “deconfliction zone” at al-Tanf are the last line of defense against Iranian expansion in Syria, and therefore must stay indefinitely.

“I want to be able to watch Iran,” Trump said further during the CBS interview. “Iran is a real problem.” He explained that “99%” of ISIS’s territory had been liberated but that a contingency of US troops must remain to prevent a resurgent Islamic State as well as to counter Iranian influence, for which American forces must remain in Iraq as well.

“When I took over, Syria was infested with ISIS. It was all over the place. And now you have very little ISIS, and you have the caliphate almost knocked out,” the president said. “We will be announcing in the not too distant future 100% of the caliphate, which is the area – the land – the area – 100. We’re at 99% right now. We’ll be at 100.”

However Trump’s invoking Iranian influence as a rationale for staying further contradicts his prior December statement that the defeat of ISIS was “the only reason” he was in Syria in the first place.

MARGARET BRENNAN: How many troops are still in Syria? When are they coming home?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: 2,000 troops.

MARGARET BRENNAN: When are they coming home?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: They’re starting to, as we gain the remainder, the final remainder of the caliphate of the area, they’ll be going to our base in Iraq, and ultimately some will be coming home. But we’re going to be there and we’re going to be staying

MARGARET BRENNAN: So that’s a matter of months?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: We have to protect Israel. We have to protect other things that we have. But we’re- yeah, they’ll be coming back in a matter of time. Look, we’re protecting the world. We’re spending more money than anybody’s ever spent in history, by a lot. We spent, over the last five years, close to 50 billion dollars a year in Afghanistan. That’s more than most countries spend for everything including education, medical, and everything else, other than a few countries.  CBS “Face the Nation” Feb.3 interview transcript

The Pentagon in recent weeks has reportedly been putting logistics in place for a troop draw down from northern and eastern Syria.

Though it remains unclear just how many troops could remain as the majority possibly begin to pullout toward US bases in Iraq, the Tanf base could remain Washington’s last remote outpost disrupting what US defense officials see as a strategic Baghdad-Damascus corridor and highway, and potential key “link” in the Tehran-to-Beirut so-called Shia land bridge.

Foreign Policy magazine has identified this argument as the final card the hawks opposing Trump’s draw down had to play in order to hinder to an actual complete US exit:

“Al-Tanf is a critical element in the effort to prevent Iran from establishing a ground line of communications from Iran through Iraq through Syria to southern Lebanon in support of Lebanese Hezbollah,” an unnamed senior US military source told the magazine.

The Israeli prime minister has pushed hard against the White House pullout plan, and “has repeatedly urged the U.S. to keep troops at Al-Tanf, according to several senior Israeli officials, who also asked not to be identified discussing private talks,” per Bloomberg. The Israelis have reportedly argued “the mere presence of American troops will act as a deterrent to Iran” even if in small numbers as a kind of symbolic threat.

The internal administration debate, following incredible push back against Trump’s withdrawal decision, has made entirely visible the national security deep state’s attempt to check the Commander-in-Chief’s power. And now US presence at al-Tanf represents the last hope of salvaging the hawks’ desire for permanent proxy war against Iran inside Syria.

It appears the deep state has won out over Trump’s initial policy decision once again; but it remains to be seen if, however slowly on what’s clearly a delayed timetable departing from his original plans, all US troops ultimately exit Syria. Until then there’ll be more time and perhaps more provocations the hawks can rely on to effectively ensure full circle return to indefinite occupation in Syria.

February 4, 2019 - Posted by | Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism, Illegal Occupation, Wars for Israel | , , , , , ,

5 Comments »

  1. Very interesting

    Comment by Nick J Wood | February 4, 2019 | Reply

  2. “We’re going to be there and we’re going to be staying. We have to protect Israel,

    Didn’t he say they had ‘trillions’ of shekels from the American Taxpayer to protect themselves…???

    Comment by wiggins | February 4, 2019 | Reply

  3. John Bolton’s glee at the prospects of regime change in Venezula, Senate Bill 1 (2019) and House Resolution 1 (2019) indicate who control the US in foreign and domestic policy issues.

    All ‘representatives’ should have to register as foreign agents.

    Comment by rediscover911com | February 4, 2019 | Reply

  4. Trump’s December 19, 2018 Twitter post announcing the “immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria” was a psychological operation to draw world media attention TO the Twitter lie, and AWAY from the December 20, 2018 United Nations meeting where the crimes and scandal of the war propaganda entity “White Helmets”.

    The non-coverage of the White Helmets scandal by world media and non-withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria since Trump’s Twitter psyop confirms this allegation.

    Comment by Jerry Alatalo | February 4, 2019 | Reply

  5. Good analysis by Tyler Durden. My augmenting thoughts:

    I smell the Zionist odor of Sheldon Adelson, slyly or even explicitly contacting Trump and causing Trump-the-Chump to accept the Zio-narrative that any change in the Syria dynamic would violate the priority-number-one terms of “Ziomonster first” in the Mideast and beyond…the hell with “MAGA” and a US-centric core-national-interests mindset. I can’t imagine anyone (“even” Rand Paul) in the Zio-compliant duopoly able to resist or disobey in a similar circumstance, so Trump might deserve some sympathy for deserting his ship along with the other rats. Perhaps, if she catches a wave from Hawaii and rides it smartly and verrry carefully like a champion surfer, Tulsi Gabbard? But I dream, in desperation.

    Hmmm. I can also conjure up the putrid stink of a Satanyahoo/Mossad false-flag attack wiping out those paltry 200 US troops at al-Tanf, with stray ID papers and a shell casing or two id’ing Iran as the perpetrator that must be held to “Bomb-Bomb-Bomb” account. After all, that tactic worked to a T (squared–TwinTowers) on 9-11-2001, didn’t it? Stay tuned….

    (Jerry, with due respect to you, I cannot believe that Trump is capable of a “psychological operation” moment. He doesn’t have the attention span of even a moment, and there is no tactical or strategic geopolitical sensing in his teenage-bully narcissistic brain. Thanks to Adelson et al, Trump is a wholly owned subsidiary of Zionism…Bolton, Pompeo, Pence, Kushner, Greenblatt, Friedman, Dershowitz…. Too bad: I harbored some initial hope for Trump, perhaps goosed by my extreme revulsion toward Killary.)

    Comment by roberthstiver | February 5, 2019 | Reply


Leave a Reply to wiggins Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.