Britain and global deaths in conflict – an estimate
By Mark Curtis | December 13, 2018
Table – Britain and global deaths in conflicts
The following table is taken from Mark Curtis’ book, Unpeople: Britain’s Secret Human Rights Abuses, published in 2004. It gives figures on the estimated number of deaths for which Britain bears ‘significant responsibility’. There are four categories of British responsibility:
- ‘Direct responsibility’ is where British military and/or covert forces have played a direct role.
- ‘Indirect responsibility’ is where Britain has provided strong support (through trade, arms exports, aid and/or diplomatic support) for allies engaged in aggression or killing.
- ‘Active inaction’ is where Britain has specifically helped to block international action to halt killings (Note that this and the second category are different than merely ‘turning a blind eye’, which would include many other cases).
- The ‘others’ category contains a solitary case, that of the Idi Amin regime’s state terror, a description of which is provided below.
Estimates on the number of deaths in any conflict always vary, often very widely. Where there is no footnote below, I have used the most commonly cited estimate. For others I have generally sourced the varying estimates. The overall figure is between 8.6 million and 13.5 million – or ‘around 10 million’. Of these, Britain bears ‘direct responsibility’ for between 4 million to nearly 6 million deaths.
Note that this figure is if anything likely to be an underestimate. For one thing, not all British interventions have been included, such as those in Oman in 1957-9 and in 1964-74 owing to lack of available on the scale of deaths. In the category of ‘indirect responsibility’, I have excluded many repressive regimes that Britain has backed throughout the postwar period; I have tended to include those cases on which I have focused in this and previous books. I have also not included US backing of the Guatemala regime from the 1960s to the 1980s, responsible for around 200,000 deaths. The reason is that while Britain strongly backed US policy in Central America, there is not as much direct and specific support for US policy in Guatemala as there was in the case of El Salvador and Nicaragua, explained in the third column.
The figures generally refer to the number of ‘enemy’ deaths rather than total deaths, where it has been possible to disaggregate the estimates.
Finally, I do not pretend this is a fully scientific analysis – the exclusion of certain episodes, the extent of British responsibility and the estimates on numbers of deaths are of course all open to interpretation, as in any table of this kind. Nevertheless, it gives a reasonably accurate reflection of British responsibility for a very large number of deaths in the postwar world.
| Conflict | Estimated number of deaths | Britain’s role |
| Direct responsibility | ||
| 2003 – invasion of Iraq | 10,000-55,000[1] | British forces played secondary role to US in military operations |
| 2001 – bombing of Afghanistan | 15,000 – 25,000[2] | Ditto |
| 1999 – bombing of Yugoslavia | 1,000[3] | British forces played secondary role to US in military operations as part of wider NATO campaign |
| 1998 – bombing of Iraq | 600 – 1,600[4] | British forces played secondary role to US in military operations |
| 1991 – Gulf war against Iraq | over 100,000[5] | Ditto |
| 1982 – Falklands war | 655 | British military fought Argentina |
| 1961-73 – war against Southeast Asia | 2 – 3 million[6] | Britain privately backed US strongly, regularly supported it publicly but also played several direct roles: providing military and ‘counter-insurgency’ advice to South Vietnam; British covert forces took part in the war; intelligence was passed to US military. The British role was therefore more ‘direct’ than ‘indirect’ (see Unpeople, chapter 12) |
| 1962-70 – war in Yemen | 100,000 – 200,000 | British secret operation involving covert action and arms supplies (see Unpeople, chapter 16) |
| 1964-7 – British suppression of Aden revolt | 300 – 900 | British ‘colonial’ government forces responsible |
| 1965/6 – Indonesian army slaughters | 500,000 – 1 million[7] | Britain provided Indonesian generals with variety of direct, covert support, including ‘information’ operations[8] |
| 1952-60 – war in Kenya | up to 150,000[9] | British colonial war and ‘resettlement’ operations[10] |
| 1948-60 – war in Malaya | 10,000 – 13,000 | Ditto[11] |
| 1957/8 – rebellion against Indonesian central government | thousands[12] | Covert operation with US to support the rebellion, including arms supplies (see Unpeople, chapter 11) |
| 1956 – British invasion of Egypt | 1,600 – 3,000[13] | Military intervention with France and Israel |
| 1948-55 – Uprising in Baltic states of the USSR | 75,000[14] | British covert operation to fund and support uprisings[15] |
| 1953 – coup in Iran | 300 | Covert operation with CIA[16] |
| 1950-3 – Korean war | at least 1 million[17] | Military played key role technically as part of UN force, in reality led by US |
| 1944-9 – Greek civil war | 65,000 – 80,000[18] | Military/covert operations to support Greek government |
| 1945-9 – war for Indonesian independence | 5,000 – 80,000[19] | Military involvement to suppress independence movement |
| SUB-TOTAL | 4.03m – 5.71m | |
| Indirect responsibility | ||
| 2000-present – Israeli killings in occupied territories | 2,723[20] | Blair government is strong supporter of Israeli policies, in various ways (see Unpeople, chapter 9) |
| 1999-present – killings in Nigeria | up to 10,000[21] | Blair government is strong supporter of Nigerian policies, in various ways (see Unpeople, chapter 10) |
| 1999-present – Second Russian invasion of Chechnya | 15,000 – 25,000[22] | Blair government is strong supporter of Russian policies, in various ways (see Unpeople, chapter 9) |
| 1996-present – Nepal civil war | 3,300[23] | Blair government provides military/diplomatic support to Nepal government (see Unpeople, chapter 9) |
| 1990- present – Colombia state killings | 20,000 – 40,000[24] | Blair and previous governments are strong supporters of Colombian policies, in various ways (see Unpeople, chapter 9) |
| 1976-present – Indonesian attacks in Aceh province | 15,000 | Blair and previous governments are strong supporters of Indonesian policies, in various ways (see Unpeople, chapter 11) |
| 1969-present – Indonesian attacks in West Papua province | 100,000 | ditto |
| 1991-2003 – Sanctions against Iraq | 500,000 – 1 million[25] | Technically maintained by the UN; in reality supported virtually solely by Britain and US |
| 1999 – Indonesian attacks in East Timor | around 5,000 | Blair government continued to support, and arm, Indonesia, throughout violence[26] |
| 1984-1999 – Turkey’s campaign against Kurds | around 30,000[27] | Blair and previous governments are strong supporters of Turkish policies, in various ways[28] |
| 1998 – US bombing of Sudan | perhaps tens of thousands[29] | Britain strongly supported US attack that destroyed pharmaceutical factor producing most of Sudan’s life-saving drugs |
| 1994-6 – Russian invasion of Chechnya | 60,000 – 100,000 | Major government provided strong support to Russia, in various ways |
| 1948-94 – Apartheid South Africa state killings | 10,000 – 20,000 | British governments consistently backed South African regimes, in various ways[30] |
| 1989 – US invasion of Panama | 350 – 3,000[31] | Britain provided strong diplomatic support |
| 1980-88 – Iran/Iraq war | 1 million | Thatcher government effectively supported Iraq’s attack on Iran, supplying it with military equipment and financial aid |
| 1987-8 – Iraq’s campaign against Kurds | 100,000 | Ditto[32] |
| 1984/5 – Ugandan civil war | 100,000 – 300,000 | Britain provided strong support to Ugandan government and maintained military training programme |
| 1984/5 – Indonesian state killings | 5,000 | Thatcher government was strong supporter of Indonesia, in various ways |
| Early 1980s – El Salvador civil war | 75,000-80,000 | Thatcher government provided strong diplomatic backing to US strategy supporting Salvadoran regime |
| 1980s – US aggression against Nicaragua | 30,000 | Thatcher government provided strong diplomatic and other backing, including covert support, to US strategy[33] |
| 1953-79 – Shah’s regime in Iran | 10,000 | British governments provided strong support to Shah’s regime, in various ways[34] |
| 1975 – Indonesian invasion of East Timor | 200,000 | Wilson/Callaghan governments provided strong backing to Indonesia in various ways[35] |
| 1973 – coup in Chile | at least 3,000 | Heath government welcomed coup and backed Pinochet regime, as did subsequent British governments (see Unpeople, chapter 14) |
| 1967-70 – Nigeria/Biafra civil war | 1 – 3 million | Wilson government gave strong backing to Nigeria in various ways (see Unpeople, chapter 10) |
| 1963 – Iraq killings | 5,000 | Macmillan government in effect supported massacres and welcomed new military government (see Unpeople, chapter 5) |
| 1960s – Iraq campaigns against Kurds | 12,000 – 100,000[36] | British governments gave strong backing to Iraq in various ways (see Unpeople, chapter 5) |
| SUB-TOTAL | 3.32m – 6.20m | |
| Active inaction | ||
| 1990s – Yugoslav civil wars | 200,000 – 250,000 | Major government played key role to prevent international action against Milosevic regime[37] |
| 1994 – Rwanda genocide | 800,000 – 1 million | Major government played key role at the UN to prevent international action to prevent or stop genocide[38] |
| SUB-TOTAL | 1m – 1.25m | |
| Others | ||
| 1971-9 – Ugandan state terror (Idi Amin era) | 300,000 | Heath government welcomed and supported Amin’s rule in its first year. Most atrocities were committed after this period but Britain bears significant responsibility in enabling Amin regime to consolidate its rule. |
| SUB-TOTAL | 300,000 | |
| TOTAL | 8.65m – 13.47m |
REFERENCES (See Unpeople book for full references)
[1] See chapter 1
[2] Figures vary widely. The Guardian estimated 10,000-20,000 civilian deaths as an indirect result of the bombing. Estimates of the military deaths are usually in the 3,000-6,000 range. Web of Deceit, p.49
[3] Human Rights Watch estimates 500 civilian deaths (‘Civilian deaths in the NATO air campaign’, February 2000, www.hrw.org). Some estimates, which include military deaths, are often over 1,000. 20th Century Atlas: Alphabetical list of war, massacre, tyranny and genocide, www.users.erols.com
[4] 20th Century Atlas
[5] Figures vary very widely; see 20th Century Atlas. Immediately after the war the US government estimated 100,000 deaths. Other independent estimates are much lower, others much higher.
[6] Figures vary very widely, from hundreds of thousands to 4 million. Most deaths were those of Vietnamese, with figures usually ranging from 1 – 3 million. Hundreds of thousands were also killed in Cambodia and Laos.
[7] Some estimates are as low as 300,000 but most credible figures are much higher and some estimate over a million.
[8] See Web of Deceit, chapter 20
[9] estimated number of deaths due principally to the brutal ‘resettlement’ operations. Estimates of number of Mau Mau killed in actual fighting vary from 10,000-13,000.
[10] See Web of Deceit, chapter 15
[11] See Web of Deceit, chapter 16
[12] Figures unknown
[13] 20th Century Atlas
[14] Prados, p.43
[15] See Dorril, chapter 16
[16] See Web of Deceit, chapter 14
[17] Figures vary very widely. This is approximate figure for North Korean and Chinese deaths
[18] This is approximate figure for deaths on the rebels (ie, EAM/ELAS) side.
[19] Figures vary extremely widely. See 20th Century Atlas
[20] Figure from September 2000 (beginning of second intifada) to March 2004; Palestinian Red Crescent Society, http://www.palestinercs.org
[21] Nigerian police and army are complicit in many of these killings; See chapter 10
[22] Russia provided an official number of 15,000 Chechen deaths by August 2003 (AFP, ‘Russia underplays Chechnya deaths’, 8 August 2003). This is likely to be a severe underestimate, especially in light of the ferocious attack on Grozny in 1999/2000.
[23] Number of deaths by government forces from 1996-2002; Web of Deceit, p.81
[24] Figures vary. 35,000 – 40,000 is a commonly cited figure since 1990; some current estimates, however, state 15,000 in the past 10 years.
[25] The UN estimated half a million deaths of children under five as a result of the 1991 war and sanctions. Former UN Coordinator for Iraq, Denis Halliday, has given a figure, including adults, of over a million. Web of Deceit, p.29
[26] See Web of Deceit, chapter 21
[27] The Turkish government in 2001 gave a figure of 23,000 Kurds killed; www.harpers.org/warcrime.html; Independent estimates are usually higher.
[28] See Web of Deceit, chapter 1
[29] see Web of Deceit, p.111; Chomsky, Hegemony or Survival, p,206
[30] See Ambiguities of Power, pp.119-29
[31] The Central American Human Rights Commission estimates 2,000-3,000; Physicians for Human Rights estimates 300 civilian deaths and 50 military deaths (‘Panama: Operation Just Cause’, December 1990)
[32] See Web of Deceit, chapter 1
[33] See Web of Deceit, chapter 4
[34] See Web of Deceit, chapter 14
[35] See Web of Deceit, chapter 21
[36] Figures vary widely; 20th Century Atlas
[37] See especially Brendan Simms, Unfinest hour: Britain and the destruction of Bosnia, Allen Lane, London, 2001
[38] See Web of Deceit, chapter 18
Share this:
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- More
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Related
June 30, 2019 - Posted by aletho | Militarism, Timeless or most popular, War Crimes | UK
1 Comment »
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Featured Video
Natural Solutions for Bladder Health (UTI’s, Stones, Cystitis) – Dr Bryan Ardis
or go to
Aletho News Archives – Video-Images
From the Archives
Noam Chomsky, Kevin Barrett and Academic Freedom
The Kevin Barrett-Chomsky Dispute in Historical Perspective – Ninth part of the series titled “9/11 and the Zionist Question”
By Prof. Tony Hall | American Herald Tribune | August 7, 2016
Noam Chomsky has been much worse than hypocritical in the role he has chosen for himself in the study of 9/11. Chomsky treats the subject of 9/11 as if he’s some sort of master of analysis on the subject of what happened. He presents his conclusions without showing the due diligence of going through the relevant primary and secondary sources in a balanced and scholarly fashion. The primary sources Chomsky chooses to disregard include passenger lists, video and photographic evidence in the public domain, eyewitness accounts, original news coverage on the day of 9/11 and the like. … continue
Blog Roll
-
Join 2,407 other subscribers
Visits Since December 2009
- 7,255,863 hits
Looking for something?
Archives
Calendar
Categories
Aletho News Civil Liberties Corruption Deception Economics Environmentalism Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism Fake News False Flag Terrorism Full Spectrum Dominance Illegal Occupation Mainstream Media, Warmongering Malthusian Ideology, Phony Scarcity Militarism Progressive Hypocrite Russophobia Science and Pseudo-Science Solidarity and Activism Subjugation - Torture Supremacism, Social Darwinism Timeless or most popular Video War Crimes Wars for IsraelTags
9/11 Afghanistan Africa al-Qaeda Australia BBC Benjamin Netanyahu Brazil Canada CDC Central Intelligence Agency China CIA CNN Covid-19 COVID-19 Vaccine Donald Trump Egypt European Union Facebook FBI FDA France Gaza Germany Google Hamas Hebron Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Human rights Hungary India Iran Iraq ISIS Israel Israeli settlement Japan Jerusalem Joe Biden Korea Latin America Lebanon Libya Middle East National Security Agency NATO New York Times North Korea NSA Obama Pakistan Palestine Poland Qatar Russia Sanctions against Iran Saudi Arabia Syria The Guardian Turkey Twitter UAE UK Ukraine United Nations United States USA Venezuela Washington Post West Bank WHO Yemen ZionismRecent Comments
Bill Francis on Chris Minns Defends NSW “Hate… Sheree Sheree on I was canceled by three newspa… Richard Ong on Czech–Slovak alignment signals… John Edward Kendrick on Colonel Jacques Baud & Nat… eddieb on Villains of Judea: Ronald Laud… rezjiekc on Substack Imposes Digital ID Ch… loongtip on US strikes three vessels in Ea… eddieb on An Avoidable Disaster Steve Jones on For Israel, The Terrorist Atta… cleversensationally3… on Over Half of Germans Feel Unab… loongtip on Investigation Into U.S. Milita… loongtip on Zelensky’s Impossible De…
Aletho News- Government Minister Steps in to Defend Met Office as Fake Temperature Scandal Escalates
- Russia, African Countries Agree to Strengthen Security Cooperation – Lavrov
- Lebanese Detainees in Israeli Prisons: When Silence Becomes Surrender
- US Weighs Port Restrictions on Spain Over Israel Arms Transit Ban
- How Israel hijacked US politics, media and tech – without Americans even realizing
- HHS to Prohibit Hospitals From Performing Sex-Change Surgery on Kids
- Natural Solutions to Bladder Health
- Medicinal plants hold key to Iran’s drought-resistant revenue
- Government Bodies Humiliated by Promoting Junk Climate Scares from Retracted Nature Paper
- 6 Palestinians Killed in Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza, including children
If Americans Knew- The 2028 Presidential Candidates – TrackAIPAC Scoresheet
- “Trump Riviera” is back on the table – Not a Ceasefire Day 71
- Commentary editor, a pioneer neoconservative, pushed Republicans, U.S. policy, and Christian evangelicals into a pro-Israel direction
- Despite ceasefire deal, Israel refuses to open the Rafah border crossing, cutting Gaza off from the world
- Palestinian ingenuity shines through adversity – Not a Ceasefire Day 70
- Amnesty: ‘Utterly preventable’ Gaza flood tragedy must mobilize global action to end Israel’s genocide
- Israel Propagandists Are Uniformly Spouting The Exact Same Line About The Bondi Beach Shooting
- Ha’aretz: Free the Palestinian Activist Who Dared to Document Israel’s Crimes in the West Bank
- Garbage Is Poisoning Gaza
- Palestinian journalist recounts rape and torture in Israeli prison
No Tricks Zone- Der Spiegel Caught Making Up Reports About Conservative America (Again)
- New Study: 8000 Years Ago Relative Sea Level Was 30 Meters Higher Than Today Across East Antarctica
- The Wind Energy Paradox: “Why More Wind Turbines Don’t Always Mean More Power”
- New Study Reopens Questions About Our Ability To Meaningfully Assess Global Mean Temperature
- Dialing Back The Panic: German Physics Prof Sees No Evidence Of Climate Tipping Points!
- Astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon Challenges The Climate Consensus … It’s The Sun, Not CO2
- Regional Cooling Since The 1980s Has Driven Glacier Advance In The Karakoram Mountains
- Greenland Petermann Glacier Has Grown 30 Kilometers Since 2012!
- New Study: Temperature-Driven CO2 Outgassing Explains 83 Percent Of CO2 Rise Since 1959
- Climate Extremists Ordered By Hamburg Court To Pay €400,000 In Damages
Contact:
atheonews (at) gmail.com
Disclaimer
This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.

That’s why the British Empire was depicted on World Maps in RED, because of the Blood that was spilled, in acquiring it.
LikeLike