Aletho News


The Last Days of the “Holocaust”

By Eric Striker – National Justice – January 29, 2020

Holocaust revisionism is perhaps the most institutionally reviled, criminally punished and socially persecuted field of research in modern Western history.

Yet, on the much publicized 75th anniversary of the Soviet liberation of Auschwitz, the gatekeepers of the Holocaust continue to give ground, kicking and screaming along the way.

The latest example is a new book by former Museum of Jewish Heritage director David G. Marwell, “Unmasking the ‘Angel of Death’,” which grants many revisionist challenges to the legend of Joseph Mengele.

Marwell’s work is considered the most well-researched mainstream biography of Mengele to date. In it, he cross references witness testimony from “survivors” with hard evidence and primary sources, only to conclude that their “memories” were “unreliable.” In other words, they are lying.

Stitching together humans to create siamese twins, smashing babies against train cars, attempts to transform boys into girls – all of the barbarism etched into the popular mind about a German in a labcoat, Marwell concludes, is nothing but a pack of atrocious hoaxes.

Marwell does stress that Mengele was a true-believing National-socialist, which in his mind is an act of evil in and of itself. According to the book, he also at times overstepped ethical boundaries, for example when studying the effects of food deprivation on the human body, but the so-called “Angel of Death” made up for this by giving subjects superior accommodations and privileged treatment when the experiments were over. The twins and dwarves he studied were treated kindly, even if looking at living people as laboratory specimens in any context is dehumanizing. By and large, the book admits that what is commonly known about Mengele is fiction constructed by rumors, novels and Hollywood which have been held as true thanks to Jewish “eyewitnesses” substantiating the hoaxes post-hoc.

Mengele’s main achievement at the camp, which Marwell credits him for, was containing and preventing a massive outbreak of typhus at Auschwitz in difficult circumstances. This saved thousands of lives, Jewish and Gentile alike. Mengele was not motivated by hate and sadism. His most intimate letters and confessions show only a passion for advancing medical science.

Majdanek: No Longer a Death Camp?

Another relatively recent victory won by revisionists is a quiet adjustment by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum to their page on the Nazi “killing centers,” They have been forced to admit that the Majdanek camp in Poland was not used to exterminate Jews.

The USHMM credits “recent research” for retracting what has traditionally been considered the sixth death camp. This is research dissident historians have contributed to while risking their freedoms, employment prospects and lives.

Majdanek was the first camp liberated by the Soviet Union, in 1944. There, they found Zyklon-B canisters, ovens and showers, which Soviet propagandists used to declare that over a million Jews were systematically murdered by gas. The evidence provided by the USSR were German documents that they asserted held coded references to systematic homicide gassings. The pattern is similar to what they later argued with Auschwitz, also liberated by the Soviets. Multiple camp guards and commanders were charged with war crimes and given the death penalty based on fictitious claims related to Majdanek.

This fairy tale was promoted by a variety of Jewish and some non-Jewish scholars. In recent years, the death toll itself has been drastically reduced from 1.3 million victims according to the academic Lucy Dawidowicz, to 78,000 according to the chief historian at the camp’s museum today. Revisionists hold that the numbers of people who died, largely of typhus, dysentary, etc, could be half of even that official figure.

The Immovable Force of Auschwitz

If you’ve noticed that the Holocaust story appears more centered around Auschwitz than usual, it’s because this is the last straw Holocaustians have to grasp on.

An interesting new fad has emerged, particularly with “ex-” revisionists, who admit that all the claims of the Holocaust are lies except the ones made specifically about Auschwitz. Some prominent figures in this sphere today include big names like David Irving and David Cole, two men who simply got tired of being imprisoned and physically beaten for their opinions on history. This is a testament to Auschwitz being the king of all third rails.

But here too, we are beginning to see official omissions of previously claimed homicidal gas chambers, for example at Auschwitz I (Stammlager), the main camp tourists visit. The USHMM now specifically distinguishes only Auschwitz II (Birkenau) as the site of homicide gassings.

Revisionists like Robert Faurisson have always contended that the gas chamber shown to visitors is a fake. Even though the French newspaper L’Express was able to get the Auschwitz Museum to admit that the gas chambers they show to people are phony, official tour guides still present the exhibit as an authentic homicide gas chamber. On the infamous Deborah Lipstadt’s website, it says that the gas chamber isn’t a fake intended to fool visitors, it’s a “recreation” meant to be “symbolic”!

Auschwitz appears to be the fortress those invested in Holocaust mythology are staking their last stand on. It is impossible for them to give any more ground without the whole story collapsing.

But nothing is etched in stone. The aggressive attempt at a Zionist shakedown of Poland, as well as antagonizing its people, could put the myth in danger. The Polish government could shut them up tomorrow by inviting both revisionists and affirmers to do an unrestricted forensic analysis of all the Auschwitz facilities and grounds. I doubt the Israelis will like the results.

The sanctity of the Holocaust narrative becomes even more imperiled thanks to the in-your-face genocidal jingoism of Netanyahu and the unsophisticated political class steering the Israeli ship. International Jewry has spent much of the last 75 years using the Holocaust as the sacred myth guiding the neo-liberal globalist order.

Netanyahu today uses it as a cheap gimmick to push for Israel’s short-term geopolitical goals. The Israelis actively tried to make Vladimir Putin the star of this year’s Holocaust show, even though most Jews see Russia as an affront to the liberal world order. Netanyahu is desperate to do whatever it takes to pull the Russians away from their alliances in Syria and Iran so that the Israeli war machine can continue to advance.

At this point, it’s not a question of historical accuracy but of power. And only power can check power. We are living in the last days of the Holohoax.

January 30, 2020 - Posted by | Deception, Timeless or most popular | ,


  1. Encouraging that historical truth is gradually making headway in the teeth of adverse legislation and physical intimidation. Nil desperandum!


    Comment by traducteur | January 30, 2020 | Reply

  2. I have no idea what happened in WWII, I wasn’t born yet. But I am not even allowed to ask questions about something called “The Holocaust” so, it makes me suspicious. 6,000,000 exactly? Doesn’t sound right does it? And, rounding up, 6,000,000 people, While your country is at war on all sides, and Gassing them and getting rid of the bodies, seems an overwhelming logistical exercise, when a single bullet for each “Victim” would have been far more “efficient”(as the Germans were famous for).
    And, of course, look at the way Israel conducts itself these days Using deception to achieve their Goals(by getting the USA to do their dirty work)…….(Mossad. “By Deception, We will make war”)
    I find it very difficult to believe “The Holocaust” story.


    Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | January 31, 2020 | Reply

  3. Had the Holocaust memorials embraced a historical overview, that collectively showed just how pervasive human slaughter really is over the course of human history, sympathies for each individual ethnic, religious or racial group would surely have strengthened the whole concept of “never again”. Focusing public attention on one particular people who endured disenfranchisement, wholesale murder, tends to stir resentments within the attending audience(es) especially when the victims use a finger of guilt across a wide swath of the gathered. I say resentments because examples are easy to find, such as, the Black Power movement in the USA, it didn’t reduce prejudicial ideas about Blacks by the mistreated lot of immigrate Mexicans, or mitigate the racism in white skinned people, where the injustice(s) of slavery, lynching mobs, segregation were portrayed to the un-mindful by the MSM and college campus protests of the 1960’s. In fact, any action or custom that draws attention away from a collective identity, towards separateness from local environs i.e., the Religious Jews of Poland in the 120th century, who donned the garb of fifteenth century Polish aristocracy, stoked the flames of diffidence in the less educated adjacent to their religious and educational enclaves. This behavior continues today among the Orthodox Jews and only serves to create (political) frictions, even by their own kinfolk.

    The violence perpetrated against Jew, Red man, Yellow, Brown and Black man should be presented collectively (yes, even white indentured servitude) into a seamless historical presentation that deals with the whole concept of intolerance, abuse and violence. The museum? I’m advocating would display those equally horrible examples of extermination such as; Mao’s rule, some fifty million Chinese murdered, the thirty million non-Jews under Hitler, Saddam Hussein, approximately one million citizens, Pol Pot killed two million Cambodians, Russia’s Stalin, an unknown but I have heard a figure of ten million countrymen, add to this some twenty two thousand Polish Army officers-lined up and executed; only God knows how many Germans were enslaved after WW II to rebuild the rail tracks Nazi soldiers tore up following Operation Barbarossa and retreat… There were and are so many “self hating” leaders not specifically mentioned here, who pulled their own people down with them.


    Comment by elmerfudzie | January 31, 2020 | Reply

  4. “Unreliable” = lying … that’s pretty cool and fresh too.
    Can I use the formula too? Tanks!


    Comment by Victor G. | February 1, 2020 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.