Aletho News


Because no animal reservoir has been found for SARS-CoV-2, it cannot properly be termed a zoonosis.* Should we call it a labnosis? And what does that mean?

By Meryl Nass, MD | July 12, 2021

After a year and a half of seeking but not finding SARS-2 in any wildlife anywhere (apart from domesticated or zoo animals that appear to have caught it from humans) is it time to say, yes, it didn’t just escape from a lab. It was created, built, assembled in a lab. Or many labs

Coronavirus scientists have been constructing new viruses out of bits and pieces of other viruses for a long time.

Why did they do it?

One answer is that it was relatively easy to do. Easier than for many other viruses. Scientists like to tinker.

Okay, but after the SARS-1 outbreak in 2002-3, and a series of SARS-1 lab leaks over the ensuing several years in China, Taiwan and Singapore, which killed a few people, especially lab workers, didn’t scientists know it was dangerous to do this?

SARS viruses were designated by the US government as “Select Agents,” meaning they had the potential to cause a deadly pandemic and/or severe economic damage to crops or livestock. Scientists had to handle them in special ways, and get permission to transfer or share them with other labs. Scientists working on SARS coronaviruses had to have been aware of the risks in what they were working on.

I previously cited a statistic from STAT. The statistic is that Fauci’s NIAID has been funding coronavirus research for over twenty years, and at a price of up to $51 million per year, pre-Covid. Until 2002, everyone thought that all coronaviruses did to humans was cause colds: 10-30% of all colds. NIAID doesn’t spend money on colds.

Coronaviruses do cause animal diseases. But still, animal diseases are not in NIAID’s bailiwick. USDA funds research on them.

Some coronavirus research made sense, such as the 2005 CDC study that showed chloroquine killed SARS-1 at achievable human doses, in the test tube. Or the 2014 NIAID study that showed chloroquine killed MERS.

But no new drugs or vaccines came out of the hundreds of millions of dollars in coronavirus research sponsored by NIAID. And when Covid hit, Fauci and his NIAID hid information on the drugs they had found to be effective against coronaviruses in the lab.

So, what were Fauci and NIAID actually doing with all the coronavirus research? What were they looking for?

It seems they were remarkably successful in creating new chimeric, pathogenic coronaviruses. But they buried the research on effective treatments.

Americans need to ask, what in heaven’s name were Fauci and his masters trying to accomplish? Who are his masters? And what other deadly viruses have they created, with or without their friends in Wuhan?

We need to know what they heck they were doing. What did these programs create? Why did these programs exist?

We need to know now, before the fear of the variants wears off, and the next dangerous bug might appear.


Other than circumstantial evidence of zoonotic cases in mink farms in the Netherlands, no cases of natural transmission from wild or domesticated animals have been confirmed. More than 40 million human COVID-19 infections reported appear to be exclusively through human-human transmission. SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 do not meet the WHO definition of zoonoses. We suggest SARS-CoV-2 should be re-classified as an EID of probable animal origin.

July 13, 2021 - Posted by | Deception, Militarism, Timeless or most popular | ,




    The video clip below is one interview from the 60th session of the Corona Investigative Committee, livestreamed on July 9, 2021, which can be found at Corona Ausschuss – Ausweichkanal channel.

    In this interview, Dr. David Martin shares a summary of his decades of research related to this global takeover via “scientific and message control”, following a trail left via US patents. His company M-CAM has reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around SARS coronavirus, including a comprehensive review of the financing.

    Contributing to the conversation are Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Attorney Viviane Fischer and Prof. Martin Schwab (legal advisor to Corona Investigative Committee). See below for partial transcript and links.

    Stay with the length of the video as more and more revelations come forward.


    Comment by Sparrow | July 13, 2021 | Reply

  2. Why would they concoct a new virus if there is already seasonal flu? I don’t believe that they are so good at microbiology that they can develop killer viruses. If that had been possible than we would all have been dead by now already. Everyone should know that viruses can either be very lethal or spread very far, but never both, so it would actually be impossible to kill us in such a way. It is much more likely that the aim of their research is to develop so called ‘vaccines’ that will kill us. The virus part of their story is a way to conceal their real objectives and it is also a trick to get their fluids inside our bodies, against our will, just as paedophiles would do. Most people understand that paedophiles should not be allowed to get close to children but they have not yet learnt that eugenicists should not be allowed to get close to healthcare.


    Comment by Balthasar Gerards | July 14, 2021 | Reply

  3. While I agree with Balthasar Gerards that the objective is to get the gene therapy poison into our bodies, it still amazes me that, after eighteen months of virologists popping out of the woodwork, nobody has actually isolated Sars-Cov2 and determined whether it is a virus or some other pathogen. Why haven’t samples been taken from people with the disease, and the samples analysed? Given that the whole pandemic narrative is based on this ‘virus’, why are we still in the dark? Red herrings and deception spring to mind. Are we being told it is a ‘virus’, when in reality it isn’t – just to get us to behave in pre-determined patterns, which deprive us of liberty and life? Whether Fauci was working on a new virus is debatable, but when one considers how the ‘virus’ spread, is it possible he was working on a way of transporting and spreading the pathogen in a controlled and directed fashion? When you look at who is most affected (and it is nearly always the lower socio-economic classes, never the rich or ‘elite’), it is hard not to conclude that it is all targeted.


    Comment by Bill Francis | July 14, 2021 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.