Aletho News


US aid to Ukraine ‘invested’ in crypto FTX scheme

Free West Media | November 14, 2022

The sudden collapse of a crypto exchange linked to the Democratic Party in the US, has revealed that FTX presently suffers from $10-$50 billion in liabilities and virtually no assets. And among those liabilities, are “investments” made by Ukraine’s leadership clique.

The company FTX, in its bankruptcy filing appears to have held tens-of-billions in American “military aid” to Ukraine. Instead of using the alleged funds to fight Russia, the money was ‘invested’ in the FTX Ponzi scheme.

From the bankruptcy filing it is clear that this money has now disappeared.

“Instead of using US military aid to fight Russia, Ukraine ‘invested’ part or all of it, into FTX, and right now, it looks like all the money’s gone,” said Hal Turner, a well-known American radio host.

The crypto money from unsuspecting clients was also used to fund the Democratic Party in the United States. More evidence has surfaced suggesting that the funds may have been stolen.

The CEO of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, was one of the top donors to the Democrats, with only George Soros outperforming his largesse. Recently, he also shared a podium with inveterate globalists Tony Blair and Bill Clinton.

According to Turner, it seems that Ukraine was receiving money from the US, and then sent it to FTX, and FTX sent it to the same Democrats, who had originally voted to send it to Ukraine.  “At this hour, it appears to some observers to be pure, criminal, money-laundering, and a criminal conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws,” said Turner.

Reuters exclusively reported that the founder and CEO FTX transferred $10 billion of customer funds from FTX to the trading company Alameda Research, which is run by his girlfriend Caroline Ellison.

Sam Bankman-Fried was born in 1992 on the campus of Stanford University into a family of academics. Born and raised to an upper-middle-class Jewish family in California, he is the son of Barbara Fried and Joseph Bankman, both professors at Stanford Law School. His aunt Linda P. Fried is the current dean of Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. His brother, Gabe Bankman-Fried, is a former Wall Street trader and the director of the non-profit Guarding Against Pandemics.

He was the second-largest individual donor to Democratic causes in the 2021–2022 election cycle with total donations of $39,8 million, only behind Soros. Of this, $27 million was given to Protect our Future PAC, bankrolled by Bankman-Fried.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are currently looking into whether mishandled customer funds. Bankman-Fried is also being investigated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for potential violations of securities rules.

November 14, 2022 - Posted by | Corruption, Deception | ,


  1. The strength of the globalists is their wealth. It is also their Achilles Heel. Take away their wealth and you discover that they have feet of clay, and are just like every other human being. Their other weakness is ‘intellectual dwarfism’ – an inability to see the mutual exclusiveness and contradictory nature of the policies they expound. For example, central bank digital currency (CBDC) requires massive computing power and facilities, and a steady and reliable power supply to allow it to function. However, climate change policy and zero emissions mean that future power supplies will be intermittent and unreliable, let alone unaffordable. So, if climate change policies are pursued fully, then CBDC is a non-starter.

    In the light of this, it is about time the doomsayers – those who think the globalists hold all the cards and are forcing us into a dystopian world – started to logically analyse their policies and contradictions, and openly mock them – showing that they are but ignorant fools. Anything less and the globalists get away with this rubbish.


    Comment by Bill Francis | November 15, 2022 | Reply

    • Since none of their schemes could possibly work to serve our present society, one must assess what they have in store.

      One answer that I’m finding usually fits is to substitute our present society with one of a few hundred millions. It seems they must believe that they can arrive at this number by 2030. Then the impossibilities mostly vanish.


      Comment by aletho | November 15, 2022 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: