Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Australian Communications Minister Michelle Rowland Tries To Justify New Censorship Law

By Cindy Harper | Reclaim The Net | July 17, 2023

Australian Communications Minister Michelle Rowland is trying to push back against claims by Coalition MPs that the proposed upcoming legislation would lead to an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth.”

The newly proposed legislation aims to strengthen the Australian Communications and Media Authority’s (ACMA) abilities to manage digital platforms that are seen to propagate “misinformation and disinformation.” However, critics rightly know that the move will threaten the very essence of free speech.

Despite these assurances, skeptics like Coalition communication spokesman David Coleman argue that the regulator will inevitably need to form an opinion on what constitutes misinformation to ensure platforms comply with the new legislation.

“For government to start defining what can and cannot be said in a democracy is hugely concerning. This bill would allow that to happen,” Coleman said, to the Sydney Morning Herald.

The proposed bill gives ACMA the authority to collect information from digital platforms about how they adhere to existing codes.

Moreover, ACMA will have the power to introduce a new “code” for companies that repeatedly fail to address so-called misinformation and disinformation or establish an industry-wide “standard” requiring the removal of harmful content.

Failing to adhere to these standards will carry significant penalties. These include substantial fines, either $6.88 million or 5% of a company’s global turnover, whichever amount is higher.

This policy approach is not without its opponents. Critics argue the broad definitions of misinformation and disinformation as material that is “false, misleading or deceptive” and “reasonably likely to cause serious harm” could be abused by political subjectivity, potentially stifling legitimate views.

Coleman expresses concern over potential self-censorship by digital platforms due to fear of incurring hefty fines. The proposed legislation, in his view, could lead to the suppression of Australians’ authentic opinions. The exemptions within the bill for professional news content, authorized electoral content, and satirical material do little to assuage such fears.

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, also expressed apprehensions about the bill’s potential to chill legitimate political expression online, due to the potential for imposing “binding standards” with severe penalties.

Despite previous attempts to increase ACMA powers by the former Morrison government in March 2022, draft legislation was never released. Rowland asserts the Albanese government’s openness to “constructive suggestions” to enhance the bill and is holding public consultations for feedback. However, the opposition has yet to take a formal stance on the legislation.

July 17, 2023 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Full Spectrum Dominance | ,

2 Comments »

  1. The mock outrage of opposition communications spokesman, David Coleman, is purely for public show and political gain. The fact that it was his side of politics, under Scott Morrison, that proposed these laws seems to have conveniently slipped his mind. It has been quite obvious to all thinking Australians that, especially since the start of the covid scamdemic, and the convening of a national cabinet, that the major political parties are under the control of external forces whose aim is to destroy the economy and enslave the population. And this attempt to remove free speech is just another step along the path to enslavement. Obviously those who propose these things are completely stupid and mindless, or they have made sure that they will get their ‘reward’. Hopefully, such perfidy will attract a just ‘reward’ – one which sees them out of parliament and out of work..

    It’s interesting to see that Meta is ‘apprehensive’. Could it be that, instead of being paid to censor comment, they might actually be fined?

    Like

    Bill Francis's avatar Comment by Bill Francis | July 18, 2023 | Reply

    • Couldn’t agree more Bill. It will be interesting to see if the new bill permits the government to block sites like Alethonews, RT, Sputnik, Tass, Rense, What Really Happened, etc. Their definition of misinformation and disinformation is so broad — deliberately so — that Australians might only have CNN and the BBC to watch and read.

      Like

      Mark's avatar Comment by Mark | July 18, 2023 | Reply


Leave a reply to Mark Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.