Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Pellegrini’s Win in Slovakia’s Won’t Allow EU to Drag It Into Conflict Against Russia

Peter Pellegrini (L) and Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico (R) after the announcement of Pellegrini’s victory in the Slovak presidential elections, April 6, 2024.
By Svetlana Ekimenko – Sputnik – 07.04.2024

Slovak parliamentary speaker Peter Pellegrini, who shares prime minister Robert Fico’s staunch opposition to continued arms supplies to Ukraine, won the second round of Slovakia’s presidential election. Pellegrini and Fico’s left-wing opposition to the Russo-Ukraine war proved to be a winning formula.

In Peter Pellegrini Slovakia will finally have a president who does not support the pro-Western position and was not “installed by the Americans,” political observer Peter Marcek told Sputnik.

“There will be coordination between the government of the Slovak Republic [led by] Robert Fico and President Peter Pellegrini, because they have one program, one direction,” he remarked.

According to Marcek, “both Fico and Pellegrini share the idea that no Anglo-Saxons should be able to dictate to us what we should do.”

Washington pursued its own goals by pushing Pellegrini’s main rival, former foreign minister Ivan Korcok, for the presidency, argued the expert, in an effort “to subordinate our will exclusively to their hegemony.”

Pellegrini, an ally of Fico, won the presidential election with 53.26 percent of the vote versus Korcok’s 46.73 percent, following declarations from 99.66 percent of voting districts.

Pellegrini said his victory meant the government would not have to face an “opposition, opportunistic power centre.” He vowed that he would “be a president who will support the government in its efforts for improving people’s lives.”

Pellegrini, 48, has Italian ancestry. He previously served as Slovakia’s prime minister from 2018 to 2020 and Minister of Health from 2019 to 2020. He also had a two-year stint as speaker of the National Council from 2014 to 2016. Pellegrini, formerly a member of Direction – Social Democracy, left that party to found Voice – Social Democracy in 2020.

The politician returned to the position of Speaker of the National Council after the 2023 parliamentary election. His Voice – Social Democracy party came third and became part of the three-party ruling coalition with PM Robert Fico’s SMER-SSD (Direction-Slovak Social Democracy) and the Slovak National Party.

Pellegrini announced his intention to run for president in January. He came second in the first round of voting in March, with 37.03 percent, trailing former Korcok who won 42.52 percent of the vote. But Pellegrini scooped up the floating voters to clinch the second round.

Commenting on the Fico and Pellegrini long-standing political alliance, Marcek pointed out that “When the government passes laws and the president can veto them, it creates problems.” But now the president and the prime minister will be on the same page.

“Pelligrini will be a president who will work well with Fico. They said at a press conference after the elections that they would support each other. They will cooperate very well this way,” said the pundit.

In Slovakia, the government holds most of the executive powers, such as picking the prime minister after parliamentary elections, swearing in the new government, and appointing Constitutional Court judges. The role of president is largely ceremonial, but includes ratifying international treaties, appointing top judges and acting as commander-in-chief of the armed forces — and has the power to veto new laws.

Bratislava can no longer support the West’s anti-Russian course, noted Marcek, who welcomed the “clear victory of Pellegrini.”

“I think that many relations, for example, with the Russian Federation, can improve. We need to develop our mutual relations,” stated the former deputy of the Slovak parliament.

“I am grateful to Russia because it is not just fighting for itself, to prevent NATO from approaching the borders of the Russian Federation,” Marcek stressed. “Russia is fighting for us all, for the traditional family values, for improving the economic situation in the world. For good relations, and most importantly — for peace and justice.”

Fico’s government has been determined to chart an independent course against NATO’s proxy war against Russia in Ukraine.

Echoing his Hungarian counterpart Victor Orban’s stance, Fico has opposed confrontation with Russia, and urged an end to military aid to Kiev. Hungary and Slovakia are the only two EU and NATO members to refuse to send arms to Ukraine.

“Peter Pellegrini hails from Robert Fico’s party, he is a social democrat, and shares the PM’s ideas and views. This means that he is in favor of ending the conflict in Ukraine and starting negotiations between Kiev and Moscow,” Marcek said. “He is against sending weapons to Ukraine, opposes such vast quantities of EU aid being sent to Kiev.”

Pellegrini stated in an interview in March that the Slovak government had a realistic position on the conflict, and voiced surprise that some countries refuse to respect Slovakia’s approach. He added that Slovakia is ready to help the Ukrainian side in demining territories and implementing civilian projects.

The president-elect believes that the conflict in Ukraine has no military solution, advocates early peace negotiations and believes that arming Ukraine could ultimately lead to disaster.

Most Slovaks want “a president who will defend Slovakia’s national interests, who will not drag Slovakia into a war but will talk about peace, who… will put Slovakia’s interests first,” Pellegrini said.

In contrast, Pellegrini’s opponent Korcok, said: “I do not think Ukraine should give up part of its territory to achieve peace.” He told reporters that “Peace cannot mean capitulation,” and could only be achieved “immediately” on the condition that Russian troops withdraw.

Fico responded by calling Korcok a “warmonger” on video ahead of the run-off. He claimed Korcok “will support everything the West tells him without hesitation, including dragging Slovakia into the war.”

But both Pellegrini and Korcok have reiterated that they would not allow the Slovak military to be sent to Ukraine.

“Slovakia has made a decision that it will not send a single soldier to Ukraine in any event. And this is despite the criticism of this sovereign position of ours. On the contrary, we will insist that the only way to end the bloodshed is to have courage to begin peace talks between the warring parties,” Pellegrini said after a meeting with Orban.

On issues such as NATO membership for Ukraine, however, the two rivals took opposing stances. Korcok insisted that the final decision on Ukraine’s membership in NATO will be made by members of the alliance if the Ukrainian side meets the necessary requirements.

But Pellegrini was adamant that there is no place for Ukraine in NATO, giving an unequivocal “no” to the question during a pre-election debate on the Markiza TV channel.

“NATO, in my opinion, is the most aggressive group of armies, that only exist to foster wars all over the world, spearheaded by the United States. And Peter Pelligrini will absolutely not agree with this,” Marcek said.

Asked how Pellegrini’s victory could affect European Union policies and if Slovakia might use its veto on issues such as aid to the Kiev regime, the political analyst said that Slovakia now had “new opportunities.”

“We will not give up the veto power to anyone,” Marcek insisted. “This is our right, even though we are a small country. Together with Viktor Orban, 100 percent we will not cede this to anyone.”

Marcek slammed European governments that were “pro-American, pro-Brussels,” adding that “They are for war against Russia.”

“Macron still wants to send soldiers to Ukraine. The government in the Czech Republic wants to continue the war, but the citizens do not,” he said. “We say, ‘We shall have none of this’.”

April 7, 2024 - Posted by | Militarism | , ,

1 Comment »

  1. Congratulations.

    However some events, although sinister like the genocide in Gaza or the war in Ukraine, are used as distractions to hide even more sinister events with repercussions much more widespread and dangerous than these conflicts.

    One of these events is the current takeover being perpetrated by the WHO (a UN branch) under the guise of “health” and so-called “pandemics” that will end every nation sovereignty on this planet, hand it over to the WHO, and impose totalitarian restrictions at the whim of unelected, unaccountable and frankly criminal technocrats.

    What is happening is better explained below by those who have followed the process started in 2022.

    There are two things they want to push on the world:

    1/ A so-called “pandemic treaty”
    2/ Amendments to the IHR regulations (IHR exist since 2005 and most people have never heard about them)

    It’s happening now:

    Feb-Mar 19-1 2024 INB meeting on pandemic treaty
    March 18-29 2024 INB meeting to finalize pandemic treaty for presentation at WHA 77 in May 2024
    May 27-31 2024 WHA 77, planned vote on pandemic treaty and IHR amendments
    September 22-23 2024 U.N. Summit of the Future (sic)
    November 5 2024 Last day to for rejection of, or reservation to IHR amendments and treaty, if amendment from 2022 is adopted shortening timeline to 10 months.

    If the WHO and the so-called “delegates” who are negotiating in complete secrecy get their way, it might mean:

    Excerpt from : https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-power-grab-pandemic-treaty-support-letter/

    According to Article 18 of the proposed IHR amendments, “Recommendations issued by WHO to States Parties with respect to persons may include the following advice”:

    1. Review proof of medical examination and any laboratory analysis.
    2. Require medical examinations.
    3. Review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis.
    4. Require vaccination or other prophylaxis.
    5. Place suspect persons under public health observation.
    6. Implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons.
    7. Implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons.
    8. Implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons.
    9. Refuse entry of suspect and affected persons.
    10. Refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas.
    11. Implement exit screening and/or restrictions on persons from affected areas.

    “Even more troubling,” Roguski said, are proposed amendments to Annex 6 which “empower the WHO to be the sole authority empowered to determine which ‘vaccines’ or other prophylaxis would be deemed to be acceptable for international travel.”

    To be sure, these amendments won’t only be advices or recommendations, they will be binding for any country who agree to them.

    We all remember how suddenly, most world countries started to implement the same absurd, unscientific, totalitarian and abusive restrictions at the same time during the “covid “crisis”. It wasn’t happenstance, it was coordinated by organizations like the WHO.

    The state of Louisiana has already voted against this coup attempt:

    https://doortofreedom.org/2024/03/29/bravo-louisiana/
    SB 133 states the WEF, the UN, and the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in Louisiana.

    But genocide Joe and his mock administration were one of the first to “propose” totalitarian amendments that would surrender US sovereignty in term of health to globalist syndicates like the WHO.

    Most people don’t even know about it and of course the global “elite” try to sell us this takeover by doing what they do best: misinforming, denying reality, leading astray and hiding the full spectrum of what is going on.

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-power-grab-pandemic-treaty-support-letter/
    https://doortofreedom.org/2023/08/03/deny-deflect-defend-the-censors-strategy-on-display/

    To have an exhaustive view of what is going on and see what they are currently planning in stealth mode for the whole world, few links from those who fight daily since years against this new coup:

    https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/these-amendments-are-unacceptable
    https://doortofreedom.org
    sovereignty coalition.org

    Like

    Voc's avatar Comment by Voc | April 7, 2024 | Reply


Leave a reply to Voc Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.