This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Sorry, but I fail to see the point of publishing this posture review.
Nobody (including US citizens) would believe that the government would stick by terms of this declared policy if g-d forbid, under attack, when after 911 there was little written on paper, be it the constitution, Geneva Convention, or Magna Carta, that was not shredded.
As for Iran, it seems fairly clear that no western provocation will be deemed too much in order to get Iran to test a weapon. Iran, of course, will never test a weapon. http://www.bibijon.org/iranimage/#Nuclear
So, if anyone can enlighten me as to the utility of publishing this review, I say thanks in advance.
LikeLike
Maybe this was true before, but the new policy lets the good ol’ USA attack a small allied nation that’s located on the eastern end of the Mediterranean, north of Egypt & south of Syria, since that nation has about 200 nuclear warheads but hasn’t signed on to any non-proliferation agreements
LikeLike
horacemanoor, they didn’t want to accidentally entangle their `bestest friend`, hence the careful wording,` in compliance with their non proliferation obligations`, but this has no applicability to them at all, since, as you too say, they haven’t signed any NP agreements.
There is no requirement that they now sign on, so no obligations.
LikeLike