Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

No, the Democrats are not innocent of responsibility for US support of Zionism

By Philip Weiss on June 18, 2011

Last night at Netroots Nation, I had a conversation with Minnesota congressman Keith Ellison, the only Muslim in the Congress, and after I congratulated him for his outspokenness on Gaza, he told me of his support for the Palestinian statehood initiative in the United Nations.

“We all say we’re for two states. Everyone is for two states. Well for me this is the rubber meeting the road. Why do we oppose it if we are for the two state solution?

“Because,” he said, answering his own question, “we are captured by the Likud and to the right of the Likud. We are not captured by Israel or even by the lobby.” Israel, he said, has a more diverse political discourse than the United States, and as for the lobby in the U.S., it’s more progressive than people give it credit, it’s the Republican right that is making trouble.

“We are captured by the dispensationalists and the dominionists. It’s a myth that the Jewish lobby is doing it. Every single Jewish congressman in the Democratic Party is for two states and for peace. But the Republican party is driving the debate, and it’s dominionists and dispensationalists who need the Jews of Israel for the end times.”

I disagreed with him. His is the conventional dodge of any Democratic or by extension communal Jewish responsibility for Palestinian rightslessness, when support for Israeli maximalism is imbedded in his own party. I told Ellison about the debate between his good friend Brian Baird, a former congressman, and then-congressman Anthony Weiner in New York in March. “Weiner has said racist and intolerant things, including that there’s no occupation.”

Ellison said, “I don’t think that Anthony necessarily represents where the Democratic Party would be given its druthers.” He said that Jews vote 80 percent for Obama and their concerns are far more diverse than Israel, they have a progressive agenda. Again we differed. I said that opinion polls show that Jews are conservative on the Israel issue, against dividing Jerusalem for instance, and that this is not a trivial area for us, and we’re an empowered community.

“A lot of communities have had you know people who are not tolerant, Every community has its own us versus them going on,” Ellison said, and he included the black community. “But you got to remember 80 percent of Jews voted for Obama.”

He went on to say, “I’ve been to Sderot, I understand the Israeli security need.” He said he has heard some insensitivity toward Israeli concerns from the Palestinian solidarity community.

The fault in Ellison’s thinking is, Rightwingers can’t be driving this debate if they did not have adherents inside the Democratic Party; and they do. Anthony Weiner is hardly alone. The Democratic Party is also extreme. And Obama is, according to the Wall Street Journal and Commentary and the Jewish press, afraid of losing Jewish money, which is likely a majority of Democratic giving, if he say, comes out against settlements in the Security Council or supports a Palestinian state in the General Assembly.

I’m having some great conversations at Netroots, meaning kindred spirits, like Ellison. But in spite of Ellison’s great efforts, this issue continues to be special, even in the progressive community. Yesterday at Netroots, a heavyweight panel including two congressmen (John Garamendi, Jim McGovern) and Darcy Burner and Steve Clemons said that Democratic Party antiwar folks have to make common cause with the Republican libertarians on Afghanistan, so as to get us out of there, by putting pressure on the president. The thrust of the panel was that Obama has become a war president, and we must take him on by talking, from an American national interest, along with Republicans, about how much money we are wasting that we could be spending on education and infrastructure.

There is no panel here to talk about a creative coalition to take on the Republican right on settlements/Palestine. Because, embedded in the Democratic Party’s left-prog base, is support for Israel no matter what.

Though again, I’m having good conversations here, there are a lot of us here. Netroots is like J Street that way. The base is to the left of the leadership. More to come soon.

June 18, 2011 - Posted by | Timeless or most popular, Wars for Israel

4 Comments »

  1. […] 19, 2011 No, the Democrats are not innocent of responsibility for US support of Zionism aletho | June 18, 2011 at 11:28 am | Categories: Timeless or most popular, Wars for Israel | URL: […]

    Like

    Pingback by No, the Democrats are not innocent of responsibility for US support of Zionism « MasterAdrian's Weblog | June 18, 2011 | Reply

  2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHTJ4K8TaG4&feature=email

    Like

    hypercrypton's avatar Comment by hypercrypton | June 20, 2011 | Reply

  3. 2 states? israel-in-occupied -palestine and several small rocks. this is their idea of 2 states. so generous.

    let these “good” people say “israel has no right to exist in palestine”.

    2 states: palestine for the palestinians. new jersey for the jews, capital in las vegas.

    Like

    5 dancing shlomos's avatar Comment by 5 dancing shlomos | June 20, 2011 | Reply

  4. the zioturds in CALIFORNIA and NEW YORK come to mind, and almost all are DINOCRATS

    Like

    DINOCRATS ARE TREASONOUS SCUM IN NEW YORK AND CALIFORNIA AS WELL AS NEVADA's avatar Comment by DINOCRATS ARE TREASONOUS SCUM IN NEW YORK AND CALIFORNIA AS WELL AS NEVADA | June 21, 2011 | Reply


Leave a reply to 5 dancing shlomos Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.