Aletho News


Iranian Parliament to Study Withdrawal from NPT

Fars News Agency | November 12, 2011

TEHRAN – Parliamentary sources revealed on Saturday that Iran’s legislature is due to discuss the country’s withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director-general released a biased report against Iran.

Vice-Chairman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Mohammad Kowsari told FNA on Saturday that his commission would “study Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT” after a relevant demand by a major political faction of the Iranian university students.

His remarks alluded to a relevant demand raised earlier today by the Iranian students’ Office for Consolidating Unity (Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat), asking the Iranian officials to review the country’s membership in the IAEA.

Kowsari underlined the “unreal” nature of the IAEA report on Iran which has been issued under the pressures of the US and Israel, and said the UN nuclear watchdog should not be turned into a place for the US false claims and allegations against other countries as it will impair the Agency’s dignity and credibility.

IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano released a US-dictated report on Iran earlier this week, in a move seen by many, even in the West, as part of Washington and Israel’s efforts to find a new pretext for intensifying pressure on Tehran.

The western diplomats and sources had informed around a month ago that the new report would contain allegations on the basis of some copied documents which have been presented to the IAEA by certain western countries to show that Iran is pursuing a military drive in its nuclear program.

Once the report was released, not only Iran, but also many world states, including Russia, China and the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) member states, strongly rejected it and blasted the UN nuclear watchdog chief for acting as a White House proxy.

Iran also said that it would not budge “an iota” from its peaceful atomic activities.

Israel and its close ally the United States accuse Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, while they have never presented any corroborative document to substantiate their allegations. Both Washington and Tel Aviv possess advanced weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear warheads.

November 12, 2011 - Posted by | Wars for Israel


  1. Withdrawal from the NPT would encourage the rats to attack Iran.

    Comment by B.Benhamid | November 12, 2011

  2. It is so parallel to the bogus charges and actions by the US in Iraq at the beginning of this century. So, it is clearly a proven strategy for US imperialism under the same pretext of WMD and instigating another war of aggression based on the baseless “War On Terrorism” which after a decade is still allowed to hold political currency because of the mass complicity even among self-deceiving anti-war and anti-imperialist activist and groups.

    Having said that, it is germane that I add what is the best article I have read on the overwhelming evidence of the 200 Israeli Mossad agents who were arrested and released outrageously by Deputy Attorney General Rabbi Michael Chertoff who is a dual US-Israeli citizen. Making it a dual inside job! Here is the URL for that article published in July, 2003. I think everyone who reads this article, will want to share it as widely as possible. I will post a few outtakes followed by the URL.:

    ‘……throughout late 2000 and 2001, a total of 200 Israeli spies were arrested. (13) It was the largest spy ring to ever be uncovered in the history of the United States. The Washington Post also reported that some of these Israelis were arrested in connection with the 9-11 investigation. (14)

    Two terror suspects were apprehended in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies. Caught red-handed, they had in their possession a high powered gun, nine hand grenades, and C-4 plastic explosives (great stuff for demolishing buildings!) Within days, this blockbuster story not only disappeared from the Mexican press, but the Israelis were quietly released and deported!

    The story in El Diario de Mexico went on to reveal that the Zionist terrorists had fake Pakistani passports on them. Can you say “false flag operation?” The probable motive of this particular botched terrorist operation was to involve oil rich Mexico in the “War on Terrorism”.

    In November of 2001, 6 more suspicious Israelis were detained in an unspecified mid-eastern state. They had in their possession box cutters, oil pipeline plans, and nuclear power plant plans. (6) The local police called in the Feds and Immigration officials took over the scene and released the men without calling the FBI. The Jerusalem Post, the Miami Herald, (7) and the Times of London (8) all carried this amazing story and all revealed how furious FBI officials were that these terror suspects with nuclear power plant plans were allowed to go free. Of course, the corruption riddled FBI would only have caved into Zionist pressure from the Justice Department’s Criminal Division boss, Michael Chertoff, and also from the ADL’s “partner”, FBI boss Robert Mueller – who would no doubt have found a way to eventually release those Israeli terror suspects too.

    A Federal memo stated that these “art students” may have had ties to an “Islamic terror group”. More likely, they were the “Islamic terror group”! Remember the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946, and how the “Arab terrorists” were actually Irgun terrorists? Remember the Zionist terrorists caught in Mexico with Arab passports? Remember the official motto of the Mossad – By Way of Deception Thou Shalt Do War. Are you getting the picture? Can you say “false flag operations”?

    Why were Israeli explosives experts, posing as “art students” roaming the halls of US Federal buildings? Why were Israeli army vets, armed with explosives and detonators, roaming the halls of the Mexican Congress? Why were Israeli “movers” caught in vans with explosives residue ? Might some of these shady characters have once also “roamed the halls” of the World Trade Center prior to 9-11? Why aren’t “60 minutes”, “Nightline”, “20/20”, and the rest of the Zionist media aggressively pursuing the story behind the Israeli “art students”

    This means that Zionist Mafia can do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, and however it wants – including orchestrating, financing, executing, and covering up the true story of events in the Middle East, the 9-11 massacre, and the ensuing “War on Terrorism” (war on Israel’s enemies).

    Now do you remember the Mossad’s “warning” about the 200 “Al-Qaeda terrorists” said to have been preparing major attacks in the US? (21) At the time of this writing, we are one year into the largest investigation in American history, and not one of these 200 “terrorists” has yet to be uncovered. (22) But 200 Israeli spies were uncovered, among them many military members, electronics experts, wiretapping and phone tapping specialists, and explosives experts with the skill to bring down tall buildings. (23) Logic and common sense leads to the conclusion that the “200 Al Qaeda terrorists” were in reality, 200 Zionist terrorists sent to frame the Arabs for terrorist attacks and drag America into a war.

    Given the current state of anti-Muslim war hysteria being promoted by the media and government, common sense dictates that if an Arab government was ever discovered to have sponsored 9-11, we’d be seeing the evidence night and day on the controlled media, and hearing about it non-stop from all the President’s warmongers as well as the Israeli-occupied US Congress and Senate. This alone is evidence that no Arab government was involved in 9-11.

    “Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about the evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information.” (25) (empasis added)

    In order for evidence “linking these Israelis to 9-11” to become classified, the evidence has to have existed in the first place! Furthermore, but it must have been very, very serious stuff indeed. Only the really ugly stuff merits the distinction of being “classified!”……’

    Comment by Bill Mitchell | November 12, 2011

  3. […] Iranian Parliament to Study Withdrawal from NPT ( […]

    Pingback by PressTV: Ex-IAEA man: New Iran report unfounded | 2012: What's the 'real' truth? | November 13, 2011

  4. […] Iranian Parliament to Study Withdrawal from NPT ( […]

    Pingback by Spotlight on Iran | The Roman Gate | November 27, 2011

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.