Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

The New “Steps Towards Democracy” in South Korea

By Konstantin Asmolov | New Eastern Outlook | August 22, 2015

On July 15 2015, the police of the Republic of Korea in Seoul raided the office and residence of members of the civil movement, “Korean Alliance”, (in Korea – the association for independent reunification and the development of democracy), who advocate the expansion of ties with the DPRK. This organization was created in November 2011 to implement the independent reunification of the two Koreas without external influence. It demands the withdrawal of foreign troops (read – the US, because there are no others) from the Korean peninsula and advocates the abolition of the National Security Law (NSL), which (among other things) prohibits citizens of the Republic of Korea, any unauthorized contact with North Koreans and actions to support the DPRK.

According to law enforcement officials, the movement is suspected of “promoting North Korean ideology and actions in support of Pyongyang.” About 100 police officers went to the movement’s offices in order to seize documents for the investigation.

According to investigators, members of the movement, which the authorities consider “anti-government“, repeatedly published messages indicating a positive attitude towards the North Korean regime on the Internet, as well as organizing public events against the NSL. Furthermore, in 2013 during a stay in Germany, one of the members of the movement allegedly attended a seminar organized by the pro-North Korean group and was in contact with officials from the DPRK.

In addition, the chairman of the organization was the late pastor, Pak Chan Kyung, who, according to secret service agents, was previously deputy chairman of the pro-North Korean, organization “Korean Association for the Reunification of the Motherland.”

Its members are holding protests, calling for a stop to the investigation, but the chances of getting away with this are very slim. After all, at the same time the law-enforcement system in South Korea has taken “an important step toward democracy.” This entails the decision by the Constitutional Court on the issue of whether possession of North Korean literature is a political offense subject to proceedings under the Law on National Security. In comparison to the ban on the United Progressive Party, against which only one judge out of nine spoke up, the number of those voting “against” has risen to three, yet the ruling has been passed.

The decision was made in connection with the appeal by Hon, who was accused by the court of Suwon of violating the National Security Law. He was counted as belonging to the “anti-state organization” on the grounds that memoirs of Kim Il Sung were found on the hard drive of his computer, but he filed a protest, claiming that he held such materials to “better know the enemy.”

The court judgement confirmed that the NSL is vital in curbing social unrest, and necessary to ensure public safety and freedom by preventing actions that could lead to a violent regime change. Moreover, according to the Court, these restrictions did not violate freedom of speech. Of course, they could be used to suppress political opposition, but this should be separated from pro-North Korean activities. Such bans are precautions against possible social instability achieved by means of illegal protests.

As stated by the judges in their verdict, “given the current circumstances in the country, national security is critically dependent on the law which is being proposed for review. We recognize that, currently, there is no clear and direct threat, but it is in the public’s interest to restrain these violent ideas before they gain impetus.” Therefore, the storage of materials was sufficient for prosecution. “Given the level of modern scientific and technological progress, the rapid dissemination of materials via the Internet is very likely. The law prohibits the storage of individual anti-state literature without legal authorization.” In other words, anything that is not permitted is prohibited. Even if you’re just interested in North Korea without being a patented fighter with the Communists, this poses the threat of sedition.

It is curious that such an interpretation is, in fact, the assumption that a person that stores such information is, a priori, a supporter of North Korea.

Three of the judges, however, did not agree with this interpretation: the punishment for possession alone without proof of proliferation creates a great potential for errors or violations of the law. Too much depends on the personal opinion of the investigator. It requires additional evidence that the accused distributed these materials or kept them because they held similar views.

Let’s translate this law into the language of reality. Just the mere fact that you keep a copy of “Mein Kampf” at home automatically makes you a fascist and a suspect in a series of other crimes motivated by ethnic hatred, why else would a person keep this at home? And silly talk such as “how can you study Hitler, without reading Hitler?” are just flimsy excuses; if you are not registered as an official opponent of Hitler, then you must be one of his secret supporters, and so, face criminal prosecution. In general, if we compare this case with Russian practice, we have to ask ourselves who is catching up with the Russian Federation – North Korea, or even the Republic of Korea?

In this context, one cannot but recall the textbook for North Korea’s lawyers, issued by the Ministry of Public Security (i.e. by the ordinary, detective police) of North Korea in 2009. The book contains a great number of examples of various offenses, including an example very similar to the aforementioned, right up to the prescribed punishment.

Finally, here’s more recent news from July 31, 2015. The Constitutional Court has recognized the legitimacy of the Republic of Korea’s Law on the election of officials, which requires Internet users to use their real names during the electoral period. This relates to paragraph 6 of Article 82 and paragraph 1 of Article 261, which requires the user to specify their real names if they want to express opinions about political parties or candidates for leadership positions. For violation of these requirements, fines of up to 10 million Won, or 8.5 thousand Dollars are enforced. This requirement is effective only during the election period, because, according to the decision of the Constitutional Court dated August 23, 2010, the collection of users’ personal information when working with the Internet violates the constitutional rights of citizens. Thus, the 2007 requirement of the identification of Internet users was lifted, so as to prevent the interference with freedom of expression on the Internet.

Today’s decision by the Constitutional Court came in response to a complaint filed in 2013 by Daum, the web-portal whose headquarters are on the island of Jeju. The Jeju Provincial Electoral Commission fined the portal for breach of compliance with the requirement to indicate the real names of users during the 2012 presidential election. The Portal administration felt that this requirement was contrary to the decision of the Constitutional Court from 2010. Meanwhile, five of the nine judges found no violation of the law requiring users to indicate their real names. Especially, since it does not reveal the individual’s full personal information and is valid only during the election period. The other four judges considered that the requirement was unconstitutional because it required online-voters to disclose personal data, even if only for a limited period.

Here we should note the following: the Internet in South Korea is already only provided with passport identification. To register on a forum or to perform any transaction, it is necessary to submit a unique identification number. But here we are talking about the compulsory disclosure of personal data in any attempt to discuss politicized issues. Obviously, it’s not just for the sake of combating Internet trolling (which is usually cited to justify abolishing anonymity), but, so the state security organs could easily identify anyone whose thinking does not coincide with “the party line.”

This is an obvious crackdown. How it interfaces with the internal policies and whether it is possible, in this context, to say that conservative circles are regaining their former influence in the Republic of Korea will be in one of our forthcoming articles.

Konstantin Asmolov, PhD (History) is a Senior Researcher at the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

August 22, 2015 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Full Spectrum Dominance | ,

5 Comments »

  1. Now, how can human beings who seek to live in unity be wrong in their desire for that. This is what is wrong with today’s world. The present economic cabal want to tell us majority that up is down an down is up.

    Like

    Comment by ribeekah | August 22, 2015 | Reply

  2. Good, needed report. I agree with you, ribeekah! There is too much wrong with this world….

    Like

    Comment by roberthstiver | August 22, 2015 | Reply

  3. The USA is an imperialist state that chronically violates it own constitution and treaties made under it, which are the supreme law of land. The Nuremberg Principles, Geneva Conventions, as well as the US War Crimes Act of 1996.
    I spent a year stationed in the northernmost US military base in South Korea in 1963 at Camp Kaiser. It was a death trap, a sacrificial bate. After understanding that, I got interested in why the US-Korean War took place, and suddenly what was happening in South Viet Nam. Furthermore, I enlisted airborne at the height of the “Cuban Missile Crisis.
    I talked with Korean War veterans who also were WW2 vets and considered “Korea the big one”
    It became obvious that something was seriously wrong in the foreign policy. That we were occupying small countries, divided in “The Cold War” that were unpopular at home (USA) and that we were not wanted there with our war machines.
    The pretext for imperialist expansion is the only foreign policy the USA has had throughout our history. Including the genocide of the native population/”American Indians.”
    It is ours to reason why! Not merely to do or die!” Civilian and military personnel, alike. Congress is unrepresentative, as is the cabal in the executive branch. The USA is an occupied country by billionaires with unconstitutional in control, while “presidents” are reduced to men’s room attendants!

    Like

    Comment by Bill Mitchell | August 22, 2015 | Reply

    • Bill, I was enlisted in the Army, 1963-67, and all that you write rings true. As for “…an occupied country by billionaires…,” I studied the Arabic language and culture in ’64-65 and learned about the Middle East with similar epiphanies as you recount re Korea, Vietnam et al. I suggest that, if you have not, you look into the “entangling alliance” between our U.S. and the Zionist state of Israel, very much including the war crime committed against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967 (just three weeks after my discharge, as it happened).

      Like

      Comment by roberthstiver | August 22, 2015 | Reply

  4. The instigation for aggression is based on the false-flag psyop of 9/11 and it was never been fully exposed, that is a transparent inside and extra-territorial criminal conspiracy between Zionist, domestic and foreign.

    The instigation for the unlawful US military aggression is based on the transparent false-flag psyop on 9/11. With the 14th anniversary just 19 days away, it is a great time to revisit that wanton act of high treason, instigating the on-going wars of aggression; which is outlawed by the Nuremberg Principles, That states the instigation of war is the primary war crime, and with the US War Crimes Act of 1966, which carries the death penalty, makes for a pack of war criminals who will do anything to save themselves, and that includes nuclear war, promulgated on another false-flag 9/11 psyop, awaiting the unlawful order to commence a thermal nuclear war, with “winner(s) take all!

    On that morning I was wakened by a phone call from by girlfriend, ordering me to get to a TV set immediately. At the time I was on my sailboat, and got to the nearby coffee shop and found out that the pentagon with hit at about 55 minutes after the first tower in NYC. I knew that was preposterous because I knew Langley AFB was 10 miles from the White House, which is just a mile or so across the Potomac River and another mile to the capitol from there; could not be defenseless! Unless compromised from within, and that would mean High Treason, Mass murder, and most likely to put the conspirators in the electric-chair, as the federal form of capitol punishment.

    The best testimony I know of on record was made of then US Senator Mark Dayton of Minnesota to the 9/11 (cover-up) commission of 8 minutes.

    http://search.tb.ask.com/search/video.jhtml?searchfor=senator+mark+dayton++testimony+on+9%2F11+video&cb=XP&pg=GGmain&p2=XPxdm307YYAus&qid=312bcac6fbeb4380a6195f5adc5ba770&n=781bb2f6&ss=sub&pn=1&st=sb&ptb=53096776-873D-4E6E-B49B-3CEC543FBBAF&tpr=&si=CMmxgKDupMcCFUNhfgodA6gKLA&vidOrd=1&vidId=9U368DWXmb8

    I am certain, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Zionist, both foreign and domestic, where co-conspirators, if not the prime architects, aided and abetted by people in the White House, Pentagon, Justice department, mass media, and with too few exceptions, a dishonorable congress and overall US press, academia, and the “silent majority” in a vast criminal conspiracy, proving that they are not patriots, but fascist enablers, waving flags and repressing free speech out of fear of a public awakening, That should have taken place, but still has not, outside the internet

    For a political explanation of 9/11 it is worth for all of us, not to miss the depth and clarity provided in:
    9-11 The Pentagon The Evidence & Conspiracy – Barbara Honegger Pdx 911 Truth runs 2 hours and 50 minutes:

    PS: Nice getting on again, I will enjoy exchanges on salient facts, our activism, and insightful analysis, and what we do better jobs on opening minds, defeating apathy and cynicism, by wit and charm, as well as hard facts strongly stated as need be.

    Like

    Comment by Bill Mitchell | August 24, 2015 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.