Aletho News


‘Clinton as president is danger to world peace’ – French National Front party leader


Photo credit – Gage Skidmore on Flickr
RT | May 20, 2016

Hillary Clinton winning the White House would constitute “a danger for the world peace,” as she would continue to drag Europe into her “destructive policy” of conflicts, Marine Le Pen, leader of the French National Front party, told RT.

While declining to endorse any of the US presidential front-runners, Le Pen said she believes there is one that would definitely not benefit France.

“There is a candidate who appears a lot more dangerous for France than the others – that’s Hillary Clinton,” the head of the National Front told RT France in an exclusive interview. “I’m not American so I don’t need to make a choice. But… in the interests of France, Hillary Clinton is probably the worst choice out there.”

Le Pen sees the Democratic frontrunner as being so “dangerous” because of Clinton’s career as US Secretary of State, in which she worked “hand in hand with the full spectrum of American decisions” that eventually “plunged the world objectively into chaos.”

“I think if she was elected she would continue this policy, a destructive policy, a policy of conflict, a policy of imprisonment of Europe in blinded Atlanticism,” Le Pen said. “I think it’s a danger for world peace.”

In December, Le Pen, who herself hopes to win France’s 2017 presidential elections, criticized Republican frontrunner Donald Trump for proposing to ban almost all Muslims from entering the United States.

“Seriously, have you ever heard me say something like that?” Le Pen said in one of her interviews, presumably in response to being compared with Trump. “I defend all the French people in France, regardless of their origin, regardless of their religion.”

The US media has repeatedly drawn comparisons between Marine Le Pen and Trump. The New York Times called the real estate mogul turned GOP frontrunner “America’s Marine Le Pen”. Bloomberg has also referred to Le Pen as “Europe’s own Donald Trump.”

While Marine Le Pen hasn’t explicitly named a “preferable” candidate for US president, her father has.

Jean-Marie Le Pen, retired long-time leader and founder of the French National Front, made headlines in February by endorsing Trump in a tweet, in which he said that if he was an American, he “would vote Donald Trump.”

Read more:

‘Hillary Clinton is the most dangerous presidential hopeful from a war standpoint’

May 20, 2016 - Posted by | Illegal Occupation, Militarism, War Crimes | , ,


  1. Well, I can surely agree that Clinton is the “greater worse” when compared with Trump. But where does that (“greater worse”; “lesser worse”) leave America — and the world? Between the proverbial rock and hard place…in a word, “worse.” I’d rather have “better”:

    We need viable third-party alternatives, including public funding for them, participation in debates, fair media coverage, support of them by respected/dissident former officials, academics, etc.! For me, as my protest of the duopoly system, I’m voting for Dr. Jill Stein and her Green Party in November (and not for the first time, either).


    Comment by roberthstiver | May 20, 2016 | Reply

    • voting for green party is just another sham, for this elections, it doesn’t matter who wins, because it is israel’s election, either way the kahazarians will win, you must get rid of all israeli firsters from government , these are the people in government today who are screaming for ww3, BUT, my predication is this, THERE WILL BE NO ELECTIONS IN THE STATES, OBAMA WILL TAKE OVER, THERE WILL BE A DICTACTORSHIP IN AMERICA, OBAMA WILL START A FALSE FLAG, OR CALIFORNIA WILL BREAK UP WITH THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT LINE, either way no elections in the states, period


      Comment by yep | May 20, 2016 | Reply

      • That is quite a scary prediction, yep: NO ELECTIONS, under various scenarios. I’ll hold you to it/them (November is not at all far away). As for “sham,” I could just stay away and not vote, an attractive possibility. But at least my one vote “for sanity” will be on the books along with another few hundred thousand or a million or so. Will anyone take note? Almost surely not.

        I can’t agree more: priority one should be ridding all Israel-firsters (no dual “citizens”!) from elective or appointive office, cleansing the media, think tanks, the financial apparatus, academia, etc. But the chokehold the Zionists have on our body politic via the “entangling alliance” has made any reasonable (less outright revolution) change in direction of the ship of state exceedingly difficult-to-impossible. The tribe has covered all its bases this time, leaving nothing to chance, and it is increasing its grip with every passing day…national, state, local….


        Comment by roberthstiver | May 20, 2016 | Reply

      • This is the first comment I’ve seen making the point that third party votes are still affirmations of the system. Quite true, and low voter turnout delegitimizes the whole outcome undermining the mandate of whichever is the winner.

        Another option, vote a partial ballot leaving presidential choices unselected.


        Comment by aletho | May 21, 2016 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.