Aletho News


Hollywood’s Revenge on Dissident Historian David Irving

By Michael Hoffman | RevisionistHistory | August 15, 2016

In late September the Zionists will once again advance their cartoon version of history by means of Hollywood, their “court” of first resort. Tinseltown is the ideal venue for projecting fantasies disguised as historical truth and trying and convicting heretics and dissidents. The target in question is English historian David Irving, author of more than 20 best-selling history books and the leading military historian of National Socialist Germany.

In the year 2000 he brought to trial a libel suit in London against Deborah Lipstadt, a dreary thought cop from Emory University in Georgia who has made it her life’s work to dream up a new category of heretic (“Holocaust denier”), reflective of the hysteria and megalomania of the religion of Holocaustianity, of which she is high priestess. The hobby horse of one obscure professor soon became a marching order for the media of the entire western world. The story behind that chilling Orwellian perversity is itself deserving of a book-length study.

Thanks to Deborah, many writers and historians now bear the career-withering “ holocaust denier” stigmata, branded both by new media (Google search engine, Wikipedia) and the senile print media. Imagine if every atheist who was a chemist, astronomer, geographer, novelist or sculptor, who did not believe that Jesus Christ rose from the dead, would have to endure going through life perpetually branded by the media as a “Resurrection-denier”?

Of course in our modern world one may deny the central tenet of Christendom all one likes. Hollywood director James Cameron lavishly funds the Resurrection denial of Israeli activist Simcha Jacobvici. In the Israeli state there is a tourist trade based on selling maps and taking tours of what the Israelis describe as the tomb where the bones of Jesus rot,  but Cameron and co. bear no contumely for it.

Acting as his own attorney, Irving went it alone against Lipstadt and her team of lawyers and researchers in the masonic courts of injustice, for which Britian is notorious. In spite of a few failings (chiefly in deciding not to call German-American chemist/historian Germar Rudolf as a witness), Irving mounted a magnificent defense against a legal team consisting of lawyers for England’s aristocracy, funded by the bottomless pockets of movie mogul Steven Spielberg, and with the Israeli ambassador seated in the courtoom with his retinue of gun-toting bodyguards — in case the presiding judge didn’t get the message about which way the verdict should go.

Unfortunately, there is no revisionist book about the Irving trial as there is for the show trial of Ernst Zündel in Canada. In the breach, on September 30 Hollywood will tender “Denial,” its mendacious spin on the ignominious Lipstadt, who was so cowardly she hid behind her high-priced lawyers and refused to take the stand and endure Mr. Irving’s cross-examination (it will be interesting to see how the film will handle this embarrassing, self-indicting fact).

The part of the slim and good-looking Irving of that era is played by Timothy Spall, a chubby thespian with a flaccid jaw who  typically portrays villains. The role of the plain-looking Prof. Lipstadt is undertaken by the glamorous Rachel Weisz, who is usually cast as a heroine.

This is a morality play in a shades-of-gray world. When Christians endeavor to slay a dragon we are told to lighten up, don’t be a fanatic, embrace diverse viewpoints. When the Zionists prepare to slay a revisionist reptile, existential factors are banished and a pure struggle between cosmic good and evil takes center stage.

We will soon place online a video of a speech this writer delivered at Mr. Irving’s “Real History” Cincinnati conference more than a decade ago, concerning Lipstadt’s use of the theological term “Amalek” to denigrate him.

In 2006, when that speech was first placed on Google’s fledgling online video channel, friends of Lipstadt had it removed. She stated afterward: “The video, which was a virulent attack on me by Hoffman, was introduced by David Irving. I am sorry the video is gone. It was such a blatant example of the venomous hatred these folks feel towards Jews. It also was a prime illustration of their delusional conspiracy theories. I had used it in a number of speeches to illustrate their thinking.”

Needless to say, there was absolutely “no hatred toward Jews” in the video. Deb can’t seem to refrain from recklessly spouting this “Jew hater” trope. It’s a Pavlovian response to any informed criticism of a Judaic academic that is accurate — and wounding because it is accurate. By ominously terming Irving “Amalek,” Prof. Lipstadt rendered him, in terms of rabbinic theology, a target for extermination (how ironic). Pointing this out is only “Jew hate” in a Wonderland world where any defiance of the impostures of the Holy People is automatically suspect; again we observe the relentless megalomania.

The trailer for the movie “Denial” 

Hoffman’s extensive archive on the libel trial, dating from January 11, 2000 to April 21, 2000

The Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH) maintains its own archive on Lipstadt/Irving

Lipstadt’s book, Denying the Holocaust is demolished by Carlo Mattogno 

August 18, 2016 - Posted by | Deception, Mainstream Media, Warmongering, Timeless or most popular | ,


  1. Anyone(and everyone) who even questions “The Holocaust” is automatically branded as a “Holocaust denier”. I personally have no idea what happened during WWII because I ‘wasn’t born yet’, so if I want to research the matter I am only allowed to believe the “official story”. David Irving has an encyclopedic knowledge of what happened in those days but has been ‘crucified'(can I use that term) by what Dr Norman Finkelstein calls “The Holocaust Industry” for putting his research to the public.
    It’s this persecution of Irving that makes me deeply suspicious of the ‘official’ story. All around the world, scholars are researching everything about all sorts of historical matters(the Inca’s, Aztecs, Egyptians, etc etc) and coming up with previously unknown facts to add to mans knowledge. But the Holocaust ‘story’ is apparently “Off Limits”.
    There’s a nasty stench to the whole matter, so I remain sceptical that the Holocaust actually occurred, but I’m not allowed to say it, am I?

    Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | August 18, 2016 | Reply

  2. Not long ago, sent an email to Lipstadt, asking her why so many lies were used to start and maintain the Holocaust™. I then listed the lies and asked for her comment:

    The one that had Jew ashes/fat used to make soap? Turned out to be a lie. The one that had Jew skin used to make lampshades? Turned out to be a lie. The one that had giant electrical mats used to electrocute Jews? Turned out to be a lie. The one that said Bergen-Belsen had homicidal gas chambers? Turned out to be a lie. The one that had the shrunken Jew heads? Turned out to be a lie. The one that said steam chambers were used to kill Jews? Turned out to be lie. The one that said electrified water vats were used at Belzec? Another lie. The one that said 4,000,000 Jews were killed at Auschwitz? Turned out to be a lie, since that number dropped to a little over one million, and that included non-Jews.

    Surprise, surprise, she never replied.

    The two biggest lies of all time are the Holocaust™ fraud and the lies about the Israeli masterminded 9/11 false flag. Since Jew Inc can’t afford to have either one exposed, it looks as if they’ll try to set off WW III between the USA and Russia to distract us GOYIM.

    Comment by Greg Bacon | August 18, 2016 | Reply

  3. David Irving is a great historian and scholar, Ms. Lipstadt is a squalid little propagandist. His place in history is assured; she will have none.

    Comment by traducteur | August 18, 2016 | Reply

  4. Six Million Jews exterminated? Where are the bodies buried? According to the International Red Cross around 270,000 people(of all ethnicities, gypsies,Jews,Germans etc) died in the “work camps” during WWII. Some died of natural causes, disease, medical problems malnutrition etc. 7 million Germans and 25/30 million Russians died in WWII. The Japanese killed around 30 million Chinese in the ’30’s and ’40’s. Many millions of people died in WWII.

    Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | August 18, 2016 | Reply

    • Given that the camps produced arms and ammunition, and were targeted by Allied bombing raids, it would follow that some, perhaps most, of the deaths were caused by the Allied Forces. Consider that starvation and disease followed the destruction of rail transport.

      No wonder the US and UK like the gas chamber story.

      Comment by aletho | August 18, 2016 | Reply

      • …..Not to mention the fire bombing of the citizens of Dresden when the war was already won.(or the Atom bombs dropped on the civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, when the war on Japan was already won)
        The logistics of rounding up, incarcerating, exterminating, and then burying all the bodies, when your country is under siege from west and East, food and fuel is severely restricted…………It’s impossible to imagine how 6,000,000 people could be “processed”, as we are TOLD to believe.
        6,000,000 people??? As Maxwell Smart used to say “Would you believe 271,300 people”

        Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | August 18, 2016 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s