Most Americans Accept Preemptive Nuclear Strike Against Iranian Civilians
By Darius Shahtahmasebi | Mint Press News | September 2, 2017
A new survey published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) suggests Americans are willing to make a first nuclear strike against Iran and kill millions of civilians in the process.
According to the report, entitled “Revisiting Hiroshima in Iran,” although the majority of Americans initially approved of President Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the nuclear bomb in 1945 on two civilian populations in Japan, a poll conducted in 1998 showed the number of Americans who approved of the decision had dropped since the 1970s and 1980s. This trend carried on even until the early 2000s and arguably to the present day.
However, the new survey shows that many Americans continue to support nuclear warfare when posed with a hypothetical (albeit currently nonexistent) threat. As the survey notes, a clear majority of Americans “would approve of using nuclear weapons first against the civilian population of a nonnuclear-armed adversary, killing 2 million Iranian civilians, if they believed that such use would save the lives of 20,000 U.S. soldiers.”
Around 60 percent of respondents polled said they would approve of the decision to kill two million Iranians.
As Bloomberg explained:
The survey casts doubt on the power of what experts call the ‘nuclear taboo,’ said Stanford University historian David Holloway, author of ‘Stalin and the Bomb.’ The idea, or hope, behind the concept is that it’s not just luck that humans haven’t dropped any nuclear weapons for 70 years — that there’s a stigma that makes the use of nuclear weapons unthinkable.”
One would have to wonder if most Americans are even aware that the Trump administration is spending billions of dollars developing its nuclear technology far beyond what America’s rivals can match. Recognizing the nuclear threat America poses to Russia and its interests, particularly by having NATO members surround Russia with its anti-missile defense system, Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a warning last year that Russia was modernizing its missile systems in preparation for what’s to come.
Russia has also warned multiple times about attacking Iran and views Iran as a strategic ally. This is just one of the factors Americans should take into account when considering the use of nuclear weapons.
As Bloomberg noted, there are a number of other factors that should also be examined:
That just means they haven’t thought about it,’ said Brian Toon, a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Colorado. They think nuclear weapons are just big bombs that blow up lots of people, he said, without considering the way a nuclear conflict -– even a ‘small’ one involving some 10 percent of the U.S. arsenal — might poison millions of men, women and children and change the climate enough to starve hundreds of millions.”
What it ultimately shows is that Americans want to fight (and instigate) wars but no longer want to expend their own people commissioning such conflicts. Polls have also demonstrated that the majority of Americans approve of the use of drone warfare against suspected terrorists, another example of Americans approving of killing people without realistically endangering personnel.
In Libya, an American drone flown out of Sicily by an American pilot based in Nevada directly struck Muammar Gaddafi’s motorcade. Little thought is paid to the fact that the U.S. helped assassinate a foreign leader in direct contravention of international law, arguably because no American personnel were killed or even endangered (in contrast, when many Americans think of Libya, they focus on the handful of American lives lost in Benghazi).
This paradigm, identified as one of three schools of thought by the MIT study, is solely concerned with “winning wars and the desire to minimize the loss of lives of their nation’s soldiers.”
This view appeared to hold even when the scenario presented to the respondents was one in which the U.S. aggravated Iran via sanctions and Iran responded with a direct attack on a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was also provoked via U.S.-led crippling economic restrictions on Japan, and even the number of military personnel killed in the hypothetical scenario MIT presented to subjects was the same as the number of U.S. personnel who died at Pearl Harbor (though this was not mentioned to respondents).
As we all know, this particular story ended with the complete destruction of Japan’s major cities through conventional bombing, as well as the nuclear decimation of two civilian populations. Also bear in mind that America’s modern day nukes are far more dangerous than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, meaning any future nuclear strike would have an even worse impact on the civilian population.
In addition to a majority of Americans’ willingness to use nuclear weapons on civilians, the survey found “an even larger percentage of Americans would approve of a conventional bombing attack designed to kill 100,000 Iranian civilians in the effort to intimidate Iran into surrendering.”
Share this:
Related
September 3, 2017 - Posted by aletho | Timeless or most popular, War Crimes | Iran, Russia, United States
7 Comments »
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Featured Video
ARE LITHIUM AND VITAMIN D THE MISSING KEYS TO MENTAL HEALTH?
or go to
Aletho News Archives – Video-Images
From the Archives
The FDA cover-up that led to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine
By Jon Rappoport | No More Fake News | May 25, 2021
As I’ve been documenting for the past year, the COVID experts have been contradicting themselves six ways from Sunday. As charlatans, they’re abject failures. They can’t keep their own story straight.
Thanks to an alert reader, I’ve come across a new blockbuster.
BY THEIR OWN STANDARDS, the FDA should never have allowed the Pfizer COVID vaccine to be shot into a single arm. The Agency’s Emergency Use Authorization was a crime—according to their own data.
Here we go.
The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]
It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than no vaccine at all—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization. … continue
Blog Roll
-
Join 2,757 other subscribers
Visits Since December 2009
- 6,754,810 hits
Looking for something?
Archives
Calendar
Categories
Aletho News Civil Liberties Corruption Deception Economics Environmentalism Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism Fake News False Flag Terrorism Full Spectrum Dominance Illegal Occupation Mainstream Media, Warmongering Malthusian Ideology, Phony Scarcity Militarism Progressive Hypocrite Russophobia Science and Pseudo-Science Solidarity and Activism Subjugation - Torture Supremacism, Social Darwinism Timeless or most popular Video War Crimes Wars for IsraelTags
9/11 Afghanistan Africa al-Qaeda Australia BBC Benjamin Netanyahu Brazil Canada CDC Central Intelligence Agency China CIA CNN Colombia Covid-19 COVID-19 Vaccine Da’esh Donald Trump Egypt European Union Facebook FBI FDA France Gaza Germany Google Hamas Hebron Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Human rights India Iran Iraq ISIS Israel Israeli settlement Japan Jerusalem Joe Biden Korea Latin America Lebanon Libya Middle East National Security Agency NATO New York Times North Korea NSA Obama Pakistan Palestine Qatar Russia Sanctions against Iran Saudi Arabia Syria The Guardian Turkey Twitter UAE UK Ukraine United Nations United States USA Venezuela Washington Post West Bank WHO Yemen ZionismRecent Comments
peterjohnarnold on Israel Accepts ‘Not Good… roberthstiver on Hamas: Biden’s ceasefire ideas… roberthstiver on DOJ: Americans Can’t Hear The… rediscover911com on Israel Accepts ‘Not Good… roberthstiver on The Israeli regime is in legal… 5 dancing shlomos on Senior German Lawmaker Demands… 5 dancing shlomos on Houthis’ Red Sea Blockade Make… Bill Francis on American Caesar and Constituti… Dennis Wilson on Senior German Lawmaker Demands… peterjohnarnold on France plans to send military… peterjohnarnold on The US is the World Leader wit… peterjohnarnold on The Israeli regime is in legal…
Aletho News
- The Maldives bans Israelis in solidarity with Palestine
- Zelensky Says US Hegemony Will End If He Loses, But That Already Happened
- Strategic developments in Ukraine – a new Cuban missile crisis?
- ARE LITHIUM AND VITAMIN D THE MISSING KEYS TO MENTAL HEALTH?
- COVID Nonsense Helped Raise Awareness of the Vaccine Industry’s Real Agenda
- The “Energy Transition” Won’t Happen
- The amount of copper needed to build EVs is ‘impossible for mining companies to produce’
- Labour’s energy claims are ‘divorced from reality’
- DOJ: Americans Can’t Hear The Biden-Hur ‘Memory Interview’ Because of ‘Deepfakes’
- Google Tightens Influence on UK Elections with New “Moderation” Tactics
If Americans Knew
- Mixed messages from Israel on ceasefire plan; US optimistic – Day 240
- Norman Finkelstein blows whistle on “Jewish supremacists”, Israel lobby
- Gaza famine intensifies; Israeli government is on a collision course – Day 239
- Stories of love, loss, and courage from Gaza
- Ceasefire deal on the table, as Gazans survey the wreckage – Day 238
- Israel, The ICC, And The Disintegration Of Our Species
- Gaza’s Stolen Healers: Hundreds of Palestinian Doctors Disappeared Into Israeli Detention
- German foreign minister says she saw nonexistent Oct. 7 rape video
- After Israeli withdrawal, “the devastation is colossal” in Jabiliya – Day 237
- Israel is trying to designate UNRWA as a terrorist org – Day 236
Richie Allen
- Today’s Show Is Cancelled – Back Tomorrow Thursday May 30th
- Call Richie Today Monday March 11th From 4.30pm
- Connect To The Richie Allen Show WhatsApp Today
- NHS Asks Patients To Choose From 12 Genders, 10 sexual Preferences & 159 Religions
- The Richie Allen Show Moves To A New Time Slot From Monday Nov 20th
- Starmer Will Sack Shadow Ministers Who Vote For Gaza Ceasefire
- AI Tool Can Predict Heart Attacks Years In Advance
- Nepal Bans TikTok To Preserve Social Harmony
- Bloke Appointed Boss Of Womb Health Charity
- WHO – “Gaza’s Biggest Hospital Becoming A Cemetery”
No Tricks Zone
- Half Of German E-Car Buyers Regret Their Purchase Or Lease!
- Oops…Cleaner Fuels Mean Less Clouds, More Warming!
- Megafossil Carbon Dating Indicates Sweden Was 2-3°C Warmer Than Today During The Last Glacial
- Met Office Warns: Extremely Wet Summer…After Warning Droughts Would Become More Frequent
- New Study: China’s Loess Plateau 7-8°C Warmer Than Today For Much Of The Last 4000 Years
- German Green Movement “A Run Amok At The Expense Of People And Nature”
- New Study: Warming Temperatures In China The ‘Main Factor’ Explaining Rising Crop Yields
- Alps’ Glacier History Contradicts German High Court Claim Of CO2 “Linear Relationship”
- Climate Research Paper Finds Tropical Storm Variability Linked Mostly To Oceanic Cycles
- HadCRUT Has Now Fully Removed 0.15°C From The 1940s Warmth ‘Blip’ As Proposed In 2009 E-mails
More Links
Contact:
atheonews (at) gmail.com
Disclaimer
This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Media fiction about Iran nukes, N. Korea hydrogen bomb, and Russian hacking of the election takes us to the brink of war.
Do unto others…
Do any readers here NOT have a copy of Christopher Bollyn’s newest book: “THE WAR ON TERROR: THE PLOT TO RULE THE MIDDLE EAST”? Be a good Johnny Appleseed and purchase/distribute copies to fellow activists, fire departments … clergy.
LikeLike
Comment by rediscover911com | September 3, 2017 |
It would be interesting to actually SEE the question which was posed to Americans in this ‘exercise’. It does sound to me like more propaganda, to be used in ‘conditioning’ the American people to accept that war ‘may be’ inevitable.
I hope that the American people realize that Russia, an Ally of Iran(and Syria) would hardly be likely to stand by and watch a Nation, so close to its own southern border, attacked with nuclear weapons from the USA, without retaliating with a volley of their own Nuclear weapons aimed at Washington, NYC and other selected targets.
I wonder if THAT would change the question, and answers to this “Survey”.
“Be careful what you wish for”……….
LikeLike
Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | September 3, 2017 |
Most Americans are too dumb to think let alone read
LikeLike
Comment by Kolo | September 4, 2017 |
By the way, Israel has Atomic AND Hydrogen Bombs at their disposal……..No problems with that?????
LikeLike
Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | September 4, 2017 |
The key phrase ….”if they believed that such use would save the lives of 20,000 U.S. soldiers.” The question is loaded. If you asked the citizens of any country if they would prefer their children die instead of far more foreigners they would likely give the same answer.
This headline reminds me too much of CNN propaganda.
LikeLike
Comment by Mike | May 13, 2018 |
And I suppose that we are all to accept that those 20,000 US soldiers would be over there defending us too.
Its as though Americans are so exceptional that they must send their children to slaughter people around the world indefinitely for their own good. And if any should dare to resist, why just turn the whole place to glass. A complete absence of human morality. Almost like Zionism.
LikeLike
Comment by aletho | May 13, 2018 |
It’s too bad that the multi thousands of dead American soldiers cannot be surveyed, and asked what they think of dying for Uncle Sam, and “The Moneymen” who have sent them to wars in the naive belief that they were fighting for “Freedom and Democracy”…..and “Defending” America……..
LikeLike
Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | May 13, 2018 |