This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.
No surprise there. I think it was “Popular Mechanics” that fully endorsed the complete farrago of lies put out in the NIST Report, agreeing with their lies that 15 Arabs used two planes to destroy the Twin Towers in NYC. About 6 buildings were actually destroyed that day, ALL by controlled demolition(Tower 6 was blown OUT) by a large Bomb and lots of gold went missing from the safe(which was opened using the ‘combination’.
And NO Real investigation was ever made into what REALLY happened.
LikeLike
It does seem ridiculous to try to link ‘climate change’ (aka man-made global warming) with political disturbances in Syria & Iran. But I think there is method in the madness of those who have made this claim.
Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is an accepted, even central doctrine among so-called “progressives” and even among organized socialists (= controlled, fake socialism) today. If you don’t believe in AGW, you are unwelcome in progressive and other leftist circles.
Since the AGW movement was the brainchild of the international finance capitalists of the City of London and, to a lesser degree, of Wall Street, these brainwashed ‘socialists’ have ironically, and stupidly, embraced a myth that was invented by, and is pushed by, their major traditional ideological enemy, the bankers.
But that’s the power of a myth that has developed into a quasi-religion, (see Gaia). Just compare past articles about AGW from The Economist magazine with articles on the same topic in socialist or even self-titled “communist” magazines and websites. The articles from both camps are virtually identical.
Now, the same forces behind the AGW myth are also behind the political disturbances in Iran and Syria. These forces want to enlist the support of ‘progressives’ and others on the left in their plans for war and the ‘toppling’ of the governments Iran & Syria. They want this support because the left has always been the main source of anti-war activism and, as the Vietnam War showed, anti-war activism can be disastrous to those who want war.
To recap, ‘climate change’ has become, more or less, a quasi-religion among most ‘progressives’ and other leftists. As a result, when someone in authority claims that climate change is the cause of some social or political unrest, leftists are very prone to accepting that statement as true. This is because true believers in a religion, any religion or cultish belief, tend to believe that their religion is the major cause of all significant events. To question the linkage of unrest in Iran and Syria with climate change is just one step away from questioning the significance of, and even the veracity of climate change itself, which is something that the brainwashed leftists are unlikely to do.
That’s my theory for the rationale of blaming the troubles in Syria and Iran on climate change.
LikeLike