Aletho News


When Will Congress Investigate All Interference in Elections?

By Philip M. GIRALDI | Strategic Culture Foundation | 22.02.2018

The atmosphere in the United States regarding possible Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election is something like hysteria, with a real danger that bilateral relations might break down completely as a result. Indeed, a number of politicians and senior government officials have described the allegations that Moscow sought to influence the election results as an “act of war” with Congressman Jerold Nadler even declaring that it was similar to Pearl Harbor.

Assuming that the indictment against 13 Russians and 3 Russian companies filed last week by Special Counsel Robert Mueller is accurate, the reported activity of the Internet Research Agency could indeed have been part of an intelligence operation seeking to influence developments in the US, but the organization’s employees also displayed considerable amateur behavior, suggesting that they were not professional spies, supporting the stronger argument that it was not a Russian government-run operation at all.

And the United States is hardly innocent when it comes to interfering in the domestic politics of both friends and enemies. That is very often what intelligence agencies are designed to do, and no one is more active in interfering in foreign governments and elections than the United States of America. The Russian election featuring Boris Yeltsin in 1996 was arranged by Washington working with the International Monetary Fund, and more recently there was the $5 billion invested in bringing “democracy” to Ukraine in 2014. The US was also involved in many of the elections in post-war Europe, most particularly in countries whose own democratic systems were still evolving. The CIA worked to keep communists out of the government in Italy’s 1976 national election. Conservative parties received sacks of money and articles warning about communism appeared in all the major newspapers. The major covert action proceeded even though Italy was a NATO member and the corruption that the intervention brought with it has blighted Italian politics to this day.

And then, there are America’s friends who in similar fashion interfere in US politics to support their own national agendas. Most active recently have been Israel and Saudi Arabia, both of which have an identical foreign policy goal, which is to end what they describe as the Iranian threat in their region. As neither has the resources to go it alone, both seek to involve the United States in what would likely be a catastrophic war for all involved, leaving Riyadh and Tel Aviv standing on the sidelines to pick up the pieces.

The Saudi lobby in the United States operates largely below the surface, working on individual congressmen and through the funding of think tanks. Israel’s manipulation of the US is, however, much more in the open. One can argue that what we are now calling Russiagate all started when Trump National Security Adviser designate Michael Flynn called Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, on December 22, 2016. The call was made at the direction of Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, who, in turn, had been approached by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to change a U.N. vote critical of Israel.

Kushner asked Flynn, the soon-to-be National Security Adviser, to help Israel by undermining what was being done by the still-in-power American government in Washington headed by President Barack Obama. In legal terms this most certainly could be construed as covered by the “conspiracy against the United States” statute that the Mueller investigation has exploited in the recent Russian indictments.

Mueller’s indictment specifically claimed that the Russians created false US personas while also stealing actual identities. But the Russians are being accused of involvement in activity that Israel engages in openly. It has interfered in US elections, to include promoting Mitt Romney over Barack Obama in 2012, and has a powerful and well-funded lobby in AIPAC that intervenes aggressively in American foreign and domestic policy. And the Israeli government’s propaganda arm uses its hasbara to use false internet identities to confuse and deflect critical stories. They do so routinely and do not even try to hide what they are doing. Part of their agenda is to smear critics and elect politicians favorable to them.

So, when will Mueller and the several congressional committees that are investigating the Russians move on to the topic of Israel and Saudi Arabia to find out what really effective foreign influencing operations looks like? Given the power of Israel and the Saudis over Congress, probably never.

February 22, 2018 - Posted by | Russophobia, Timeless or most popular, Wars for Israel | , , , ,


  1. What persuasion of politics are “the Russians” who are indicted? Bolshevik/Marxist?

    Does Russia have its version of zionists as the US has–many working more for Israel than for the American people’s interests?

    Which candidate were “the Russians” working to elect? Or, was the effort being made like Antifa intrusions into Trump campaign rallies–designed to divide?

    Let’s be more specific than just calling them “the Russians”.

    Comment by rediscover911com | February 22, 2018 | Reply

    • I have no doubt that Internet Research Associates was a clickbait ad marketing business.

      The reason that they did everything they are alleged to have done is explained by that simple and obvious conclusion.

      Aletho News gets propositions to embed links into copy from similar operations on an ongoing basis. It’s all about posting on trending topics, getting linked to or at least crawled by google, and getting viewers to click on an embedded link which then generates ad income.

      Comment by aletho | February 22, 2018 | Reply

  2. Lol, um, NEVER?
    Haven’t you seen all the standing ovations for nutty? In our very halls of Congress and Senate? It makes me bulimic.

    I betcha every single one of those old white men, above, are jewish/zionist/israeli-dual-citizen. Interference in elections? Here’s your clue.

    Comment by tsisageya | February 22, 2018 | Reply

  3. Superior analysis/reporting by Phil Giraldi…except that I shall not agree with his final paragraph “Given the power of Israel and the Saudis over Congress…” as co-equal drivers of influence over the US body politic in Zionist-Occupied WashDC. Phil could have mentioned Satanyahu’s (2015?) appearance before the joint houses of Congress during which he received 29 standing ovations as he brazenly sought to undermine the Obama Administration’s efforts to actualize the JCPOA with Iran. He could also have recalled the Zionist Steve Rosen who once boasted (paraphrase) “Over lunch, I can secure on a napkin the signatures of 70 senators on any issue favorable to Israel”; or the typically 100-0 or 97-3 Senate votes [similarly lopsided in the House] on resolutions or bills putting the Zioentity’s interests ahead of America’s. It’s all the worse today, even as the despicable Saudis are intent on cozying up to the Zioentity vis-à-vis Iran. Ergo, there is no way — no way, NO WAY — that KSA’s clout comes close to the stranglehold (“entangling alliance”) weighting down the US by the “ally” that, for starters, via its agents and operatives, sets the tone and execution of US foreign policy.

    Comment by roberthstiver | February 23, 2018 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.