Aletho News


Everything You Wanted to Know About Pete Buttigieg, But Were Too Afraid to Ask

By Robert Bridge | Strategic Culture Foundation | February 19, 2020

Rhodes Scholar. Afghan vet. Mayor. An impressive resume, to be sure, but to have made the fantastic leap from local politics to the doorstep of the Oval Office – at the age of just 38 – seems altogether impossible without some serious behind-the-scenes connections.

Let’s just cut right to the chase with a couple questions that the media has glaringly failed to consider about the top-polling Democratic presidential candidate. First, the most obvious one. How on earth does a young Midwestern mayor, regardless of his polished resume, jump to the front of the serving line, past hundreds of veteran politicians who have quietly nurtured presidential ambitions inside of the Beltway their entire lives?

As The Economist emphatically stated this week, “Mr Buttigieg is ridiculously young to be doing so well.”

Second, if the mayor of South Bend, Indiana (pop. 101,166) is now in serious contention to challenge Donald Trump in November, what exactly does that say about the depth of the Democratic bench, loaded as it is with Senators, House members, Governors and various state officials with far more political experience and acumen?

While the Oval Office has seen its share of pretenders, and even actors, the great majority of those men who made it to the pinnacle of power have spent at least some time in high political office before contemplating a presidential run. Incidentally, it is on this particular point, political experience, which could make a Trump-Buttigieg debate a very interesting spectacle. Although Buttigieg has limited political experience, Trump had none before he entered the White House, although certainly proving his abilities once in office.

For Pete’s sake!

Born on January 19, 1982, Buttigieg graduated valedictorian from St. Joseph High School in 2000. That same year he won a JFK ‘Profiles in Courage’ essay contest on the subject of none other than Bernie Sanders, the democratic socialist the incredibly rising mayor is competing against for the November nod. “Above all, I commend Bernie Sanders for giving me an answer to those who say American young people see politics as a cesspool of corruption, beyond redemption,” Buttigieg wrote. His trip to Washington D.C. to collect his prize included a meeting with members of the Kennedy clan, an honor that must have left a deep impression on the 18 year old.

Upon graduation from Harvard University, Buttigieg did a stint (2007-2010) at the Chicago office of McKinsey & Co, the discreet U.S. management consulting firm. During his time there, the young upstart took a trip to perhaps the most unlikely destinations in the world, Somaliland, a self-proclaimed independent state in Africa that is struggling for international recognition to this day. In other words, not a trip to Disneyland.

Just before embarking on his African adventure (Summer of 2008), Buttigieg was taken on as a fellow with the Truman National Security Project, a neoliberal think tank that has been described as “a powerful and exclusive club for the best and brightest young progressives in the country.” Among its esteemed alumni is none other than Madeleine Albright, chief architect of NATO’s obliteration of Yugoslavia. Meanwhile, the founder of the Truman Project, Rachel Kleinfeld, deserves some consideration.

Upon graduating from Oxford, Kleinfeld took up employment with Booz Allen Hamilton, the private contractor that carried out a long list of services for the military. It has also been described as “the world’s most profitable spy organization.” The head of the company at the time was none other than James Woolsey, the neoconservative former CIA director who has advocated for a fiercely interventionist U.S. foreign policy, notably the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Back to Somaliland. In addition to Buttigieg’s affiliation with the Truman Center, where he now sits on the advisory board, his Somalian ‘vacation’ managed to garner special attention in The New York Times, suggesting this was much more than your ordinary getaway.

“Somaliland is pursuing investment and support from China and Gulf countries,” Buttigieg wrote in the Times piece, co-authored by Nathaniel Myers, who also went along for the joyride. “Such support might be enough to ensure Somaliland’s survival and eventual growth, but it will crowd out America’s chance to win the gratitude of a potentially valuable ally in a very troubled area.”

Possibly more than just incidentally, Myers, a Harvard buddy of Buttigieg, now serves as Senior Transition Advisor at USAID – Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI), which works to destabilize governments deemed unfavorable to U.S. interests.

Just over a year later, in September 2009, Buttigieg, and despite his participation in anti-war rallies while at Harvard, signed up for the U.S. Navy Reserve. Due to his particular “pedigree,” writes Stars and Stripes magazine, he was sworn in as an ensign in naval intelligence without any prior preparation, which is not the traditional route for enlistees. In 2014, he was deployed to Afghanistan, which required Buttigieg to take a seven-month leave of absence from his mayoral duties in South Bend. Here is where the political upstart’s career begins to look a little sketchy.

According to The Grayzone, Buttigieg “spent his six months in Afghanistan in 2014 with a little-known unit that operated under the watch of the Drug Enforcement Administration. It was the Afghanistan Threat Finance Cell (ATFC), according to his appointment papers.”

What exactly did Special Officer Pete Buttigieg do in this unit, which was founded by none other than the future CIA chief General David Patreaus, who at the time was the head of U.S. Central Command? Well, that’s hard to say because the job description that appears in his discharge papers is left conveniently blank. This, and the fact that the ATFC has direct links to U.S. intelligence has fueled rumors with regards to who or what was responsible for placing the mayor of South Bend, Indiana on the political fast lane.

But those sorts of connections alone cannot explain Buttigieg’s meteoric rise in Washington, D.C., especially when the young upstart spent the majority of his time in South Bend. No, Pete Buttigieg would require boatloads of cash to earn such fame in such a short time. And as it turns out, the money has been pouring into his coffers from some of the wealthiest families in the country.

Buttigieg attracts the bucks

According to federal election data, forty billionaires and their spouses have donated to Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign, putting his campaign war chest at around $52 million, the most collected among all the Democratic candidates. An analysis of the contributions shows that the majority of the billionaire donators came from the financial, media and technology sectors.

Of particular interest, however, is how much the tech titans of Silicon Valley have lavished the democratic frontrunner with attention as well as infusions of hard cash. In December, for example, Rex Reed, co-founder of Netflix, helped organize a fundraising dinner at a wine cellar in Palo Alto, California, which gave Buttigieg’s Democratic opponents a golden opportunity to expose his billionaire connections.

“Billionaires in wine caves should not pick the next president of the United States,” Elizabeth Warren told Buttigieg in a December debate.

Buttigieg responded that he was “literally the only person on this stage who is not a millionaire or a billionaire,” and that therefore Warren had failed the “purity test.”

It’s not just billionaires, however, who are cracking open their wallets for the Indiana native. The list includes more than 200 foreign policy and intelligence officials, including Anthony Lake, national security adviser for President Clinton, former National Security Council spokesman Ned Price, and former deputy CIA director David Cohen, among many others. Although such support from the foreign policy and intelligence community doesn’t prove cause and effect, it has helped spawn a number of online conspiracy theories that Buttigieg is something of a Manchurian candidate, propped up by a deep state desperate to beat the swamp drainer Donald J. Trump.

Those ideas were brought to a boil during the Iowa caucus when the aptly named app Shadow, designed to perform the simple task of reporting the polling results in a timely and efficient manner, fizzled out just as Bernie Sanders had taken a commanding lead over Buttigieg. Would it come as any surprise that Shadow Inc. has a very shadowy history?

“Shadow Inc. was picked in secret by the Iowa Democratic Party after its leaders consulted with the Democratic National Committee on vetting vendors and security protocols for developing a phone app used to gather and tabulate the caucus results,” AP reported. “Shadow Inc. was launched by ACRONYM, a nonprofit corporation founded in 2017 by Tara McGowan, a political strategist who runs companies aimed at promoting Democratic candidates and priorities.”

McGowan is married to none other than Michael Halle, a senior strategist for Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign, which records show has also paid Shadow Inc. $42,500 for the use of software.

And people wonder why there are so many ‘conspiracy theorists’ running around these days.

In any case, the glitch led to many days of debate as to who really won the Midwestern state, a debate that continues today. Yet despite that state of mass confusion, Buttigieg didn’t miss an opportunity to seize victory from the claws of (possible) defeat, announcing just hours after the technological breakdown that he had been “victorious” in Iowa. Meanwhile, Sanders’ supporters saw it as yet another brazen move by the DNC to sideline the democratic socialist.

So how does one explain the incredible string of political success for the young star of the Democratic Party? Is he really so politically talented and smart that there was no choice but to let him move to the front of the pack? That seems hard to believe since his speeches come off as hollow and scripted, a rhetorical trick that many politicians with far more experience have perfected. And how about all those billionaires, former state officials and people from the national security apparatus who have come forward to support him? A case of billionaire grassroots democracy in action, or just more good luck for the South Bend native?

As it stands, Pete Buttigieg remains a great mystery, a proverbial dark horse on the U.S. political scene. While there can be no question that he has a long future in American politics, it is too early to tell if that will be a good thing for the American people. There is still a lot of unpacking to do on the life and times of the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana.

February 19, 2020 - Posted by | Deception | , ,


  1. This is an excellent expose of Buttigieg (many facts unknown to me) — and, to my macro-level-trending mind, ample evidence that the Democrat side of the duopoly coin is scarred (not scared: scarred, as if run over multiple times in the street by passing vehicles) beyond recognition and viability. I hereby declare the bully Trump (part of the bullying triopoly of Adelson-Satanyahu-Trump) the “winner” in November 2020. The “losers”? (1) The Palestinians, who will have irrevocably been stomped on and extinguished as a culture and polity; (2) all of us who, by affinity with Palestine or by “going along and accepting” the parameters of a generalized next-four-years of bullying, control and domination, are Palestinians now.


    Comment by roberthstiver | February 19, 2020 | Reply

  2. This article is an excellent expose’ and invokes a flashback to the pre-presidential Obama legacy. You see “folks” (I just couldn’t resist the urge to insert one of Obama’s popular quips here) the CIA does not want future candidate(s) for the Oval Office with a personality similar to President Carter, where his courage was exemplified by firing roughly seven hundred of those Intel “cowboys”. So, predictably, the new strategy since the Ford regime was to resurrect a neocon element to penetrate into all future presidential hopefuls, the selection of their White House aids and cabinet members. To wit, Obama’s surreptitious visit to Pakistan, circa 1981 at a time when any US citizen would be thoroughly interviewed by state department officials as to why the visit was a necessity. In review, it was one of the CIA’s very own, John O. Brennan, who dispatched an underlings to insert? a 1981 Pakistan-Indonesia stamp to Obama’s American passport? The question still remains and to this very day, Obama my have traveled to Pakistan on an American passport, however, it does not mean that he did. Yet, the fourth estate (such as it was or is) never openly discussed Obama’s visit to his Pakistan based employer, Business International (BI) nor did it question a well documented affiliation with Intel Agencies and various undercover actions. Our western Occident MSM did not delve into the particulars regarding Obama’s mother Ann Dunham, who had a direct association with several organizations connected to the CIA. For example; Agency for International Development (AID), the Asia Foundation, Development Alternatives, Inc., and the Ford Foundation. In summary, each candidate since Ford and now in particular Pete Buttigieg, can be suspected as either being in part or wholly compromised by the “deep state” apparatus. One outlier in this equation is President Trump, and this fact alone is reason enough to win over my vote for a second term in office.


    Comment by elmerfudzie | February 19, 2020 | Reply

    • I can, and do, appreciate your overview, but that doesn’t make me “like” it for the very reason that your analysis doesn’t even approach the Zionization of America. Adelson, Satanyahu et al properly read Trump’s bullying predilections and drew him into their entangled net. I don’t know whether the CIA is actively a part of that net, but Trump has essentially gone against one monolith — call it deep state, MIC, whatever you prefer, but Trump has surrendered whatever you might call it to complete bullying concert, subservience, and mirror-bullying performance to the uber-monolith Zionism. Me?–I don’t want America to be controlled and dominated by any other than “We, the people.” (But of course, that sentiment presumes that “We” are not “dumbed down” to an extent that is irretrievable, and I sadly cannot make that case. That leads me to resignation and “a life of quiet desperation” [thx, HDThoreau].)

      First, pity my brothers and sisters, the Palestinians….

      P.s. Recommended reading: Alison Weir’s “Against Our Better Judgment.”)


      Comment by roberthstiver | February 19, 2020 | Reply

      • From elmerfudzie to roberthstiver. Two long standing issues remain unresolved and until a remedy is found, will permit dark powers to seep into every level of democratic governments-everywhere. The first issue is true campaign finance reform and the other is assigning, or rather, removing the status of person-hood to corporate entities. A corrupted (bought off) legislative, judicial and executive bodies cannot help but do as the puppet master commands, be it some form of Zionism, corporatism, fascism, oligarchy, even bankster-ism (federal reserve banks and their respective board members) . I include in this effort to obtain true campaign finance reform, removing the lobbying presence inside the beltway. Today, the corporate entity has risen to completely overtake any democratic representation, of and by the people. Originally (circa the early1800’s) American corporations were permitted to exist and papers were drawn based on the specific duties they were about to perform for the benefit of society in general…For example, building a bridge. Once the job was done, the incorporation was either liquidated or sent to local governing bodies to re access their entitlement(s) or reincorporation papers or status, this in order to remain in existence. Old man Rockefeller changed the governance and oversight privilege by forcing and promulgating legislation(s) such as limited liability clauses and (eventually) person-hood provisions to be built into corporate entities, thus creating a parallel government within the government. It all began in Delaware and until we clear our heads and assign names to the actual problems, as I’ve itemized here, our citizenry at large will never experience the freedom to choose our own destiny.

        Liked by 1 person

        Comment by elmerfudzie | February 19, 2020 | Reply

        • Thoughtfully presentedl — thanks! (Need some additional commenters/perspectives….)


          Comment by roberthstiver | February 20, 2020 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.