Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Entire social media is dominated by Zionists

By Kevin Barrett | Press TV | October 30, 2020

Instagram apparently has now unblocked the Supreme Leader of Iran’s account on Instagram after having blocked it due to the Supreme Leader speaking out about the censorship controversy in France.

It’s ironic, of course, that social media would be censoring people who speak out about a censorship controversy. But that’s where we are now in the Zionist-occupied West. You’re not even allowed to raise the topic of being censored. If you are censored and then you complain about being censored on a sensitive topic, they will censor your complaint, and nobody will ever even hear that you’ve been censored or what your argument is about it.

And this, in particular, seems to be the case with anybody who asks why it is that in a country like France, the leadership, namely Macron, seems to believe that it’s freedom of expression when you obscenely or pornographically incite violence by blaspheming and slandering and libeling a revered religious figure, in this case, the Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him. But it’s okay to imprison people and ruin their lives if they very calmly and compassionately and in a scholarly and academic manner question some of the victors’ history of World War Two.

Even raising this issue gets people censored. And it just happened to the Supreme Leader. And of course this is one reason that Press TV and other Iranian outlets, among many other world outlets, have been censored throughout social media. The entire social media is either owned or dominated by Zionists, as is the mainstream corporate media.

They don’t want anybody raising this gross contradiction in public. And the fact is that the reason that they won’t let you talk about this, just like the reason they won’t let you talk about World War Two victors’ history, is that the victors always write the history of every war and they always lie and they always exaggerate the crimes of their enemies and downplay their own crimes.

So the revisionists will probably win the argument. Those of us who’ve actually done some reading on the pros and cons of the World War II revisionist case—almost everybody who actually sits down and reads the books—ends up realizing that the revisionists are probably right about at least some of their claims. And that’s the reason we’re not allowed to talk about it. Because if this were debated freely and openly in a scholarly manner the revisionists would win, and the fundamentalist religion of Holocaust worship would disappear.

So, in France, we’ve got a censorship campaign censoring people who argue in a scholarly manner, but they protect “freedom of speech”—la liberté—of the people who blaspheme and use obscenity, pornography, libel, and incitement.

Now, this is exactly the opposite of the American First Amendment position. Here in the United States, we have a very well-developed jurisprudence of free speech under our First Amendment. And that jurisprudence has largely concluded that all serious arguments with social value are protected, but there are exceptions, including blasphemy, pornography, libel, and incitement.

The Zionists have managed to roll back some of that, and now some say that Zionist Supreme Court decisions have made pornography a protected category of speech. This is disgusting and insane. Blasphemy, obscenity, pornography, libel, and incitement are not protected speech and never will be. But apparently, in the Zionist world, those kinds of speech are the ones that you protect, while thoughtful academic scholarly speech investigating victors’ history and finding that it’s wrong deserves censorship. And the people, the scholars, and the historians who engage in that speech are routinely physically attacked, hospitalized, thrown in prison, their lives are ruined, all their books are suppressed. That’s freedom in the West today.

Dr. Kevin Barrett is an American author, journalist and radio host with a Ph.D. in Islamic and Arabic Studies. He has been studying the events of 9/11 since late 2003.

October 31, 2020 - Posted by | Civil Liberties | ,

6 Comments »

  1. Dr. Barrett = Jeremiah, crying valiantly in the wilderness.

    Like

    Comment by roberthstiver | October 31, 2020 | Reply

  2. We must hope that truth will out, in the long run. The Zionist stranglehold, on the media and on Palestine, will eventually be broken.

    Liked by 3 people

    Comment by traducteur | October 31, 2020 | Reply

    • “Like” but not optimistic. Via their tried-and-true warfare-wordfare-lawfare tactics, the Zionists are inching closer to total control and domination of us who carry their water and hew their wood.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by roberthstiver | October 31, 2020 | Reply

  3. Yes, to the story and to the comments: agreement and appreciation.

    Braveheart is necessary. Perhaps more than necessary. Essential. For one thing, consider that the Zionist cause came to establish their Jewish-only nation/state by means of war, deception and terrorism. That war, deception and terrorism continues. Those who contribute and champion it are complicit. Whether by being bribed, intimidated or committed, whether jewish or not. Complicit, mind you, means a part of, whether actually committing the crimes or taking part in the military actions.

    To know and be complicit is as criminal. So, when any of American politicians say, like Joe Biden, “I’m a Zionist,” or his accomplice comes out to proclaim Israel must have its billions per year of extorted American-tax payer money, they are complicit. They are a part of Israel.

    Is that what you want leading the country, Americans? To object to that doesn’t take much Braveheart. But better what the Zionists will try to do to those who show moral courage to counter what has come and what will come if they continue to have their way. Is that what you want, America?

    For they care not for America, as much as they care for the maimed, murdered, imprisoned and brutalized Palestinians. They are that racist and their leaders have openly said as much, to be embraced by that nation/state’s people, its military, its citizens and their partisans abroad. The evidence is provided, is shown in its history.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by michael | October 31, 2020 | Reply

    • “Is that what you want leading the country, Americans?” No! I voted a few days ago — bravely, ineffectually — for the Green Party 2020 POTUS candidates who wish to change the direction of America.

      We Americans — like it or not — are all Palestinians now. (And we are not alone…e.g., the tragic-sordid tale of Corbyn-UK….)

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by roberthstiver | October 31, 2020 | Reply

  4. “So, in France, we’ve got a censorship campaign censoring people who argue in a scholarly manner, but they protect “freedom of speech”—la liberté—of the people who blaspheme and use obscenity, pornography, libel, and incitement”.

    The Zionists want to ensure that THEY control the Internet, just like they control the MSM. That way, “Propaganda” will overwhelm “The TRUTH”, and they’ll own it…….

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by brianharryaustralia | October 31, 2020 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.