Aletho News


NATO Claims ‘Immunity’ to Serbian Lawsuits on Use of Depleted Uranium in 1999 Bombings

By Ilya Tsukanov | Samizdat | May 25, 2022

The Western alliance spent 78 days bombing Yugoslavia in 1999, contaminating the Balkan nation with at least 15 tonnes of highly toxic depleted uranium (DU) munitions. Serbian attorneys have filed multiple lawsuits against NATO, but have yet to receive any formal admission of wrongdoing by the alliance for its actions.

NATO has formally responded to lawsuits filed by Serbs with the Belgrade High Court over the bloc’s DU munitions use during the 1999 bombing campaign, claiming immunity from prosecution, Srdan Aleksic, a lawyer representing victims, has told Sputnik Serbia.

“In its statement to the court, NATO’s liaison office in Serbia indicated that the alliance has full immunity under Serbian jurisdiction on the basis of the 2005 agreement between the alliance and the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro ‘On the transit participation and support of peacekeeping operations,’ and the 2006 agreement under which the liaison office in Belgrade was created,” Aleksic said.

The attorney dismissed the ‘immunity’ claims, insisting that “none of these agreements gives immunity to NATO as an organization, and immunity cannot be applied retroactively. Therefore, NATO cannot receive immunity for war crimes against civilians and for its illegal aggression under the 2005 agreement.”

“In our case about DU bombings resulting in casualties among the civilian population, soldiers and policemen, NATO carries responsibility for the violation of the right to life and for damages caused,” Aleksic stressed.

The attorney expects the Belgrade High Court to proceed with hearings on the matter in October.

Aleksic and Italian attorney Angelo Fiore Tartaglia filed a lawsuit against NATO over its use of depleted uranium in the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia in January 2021. Two additional lawsuits were filed earlier this year. Tartaglia had previously successfully represented nearly 200 Italian troops who died of cancer or became seriously ill after being exposed to DU while serving in Kosovo during NATO’s ‘peacekeeping’ mission in that Serbian region.

The Belgrade District Court found US General Wesley Clark and NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana guilty of war crimes in September 2000 for the 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia. However, the colour revolution that overthrew Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic in October 2000 led to a review of the verdict, and in late 2001, Serbia’s Supreme Court overturned the ruling.

Serbia suffers one of the highest cancer rates in Europe, with nearly 60,000 oncology patients diagnosed each year and the cancer rate among children up to 2.5 times above the European average. Serbian doctors are convinced that the high oncology rate is directly connected to the liberal use of DU munitions during the NATO bombing. Along with cancers, scientists have reported an alarming spike in infertility, autoimmune diseases and mental disorders over the past two decades, including post-traumatic stress and other psychological problems associated with the bombings.

Earlier this year, Serbian Institute of Radiology and Oncology director Dr. Danica Grujicic told Sputnik that the 1999 bombings had a devastating impact on the region’s ecology and that the use of DU, combined with deliberate attacks on chemical plants and hazardous industrial facilities, created an environmental disaster affecting countries far beyond the borders of the former Yugoslavia.

May 26, 2022 - Posted by | Timeless or most popular, War Crimes | ,


  1. Right. All those people suffering from this mass poisoning had a say in what was allegedly “agreed upon”? How many times is the USA going to use WMD’s before THEY are held accountable? NATO is just a neighborhood gang basically feeding upon the weak, a political “blob” trying to devour everything in its path. Steve McQueen could probably play Putin pretty well! Both are(were) short men.


    Comment by Hank | May 26, 2022 | Reply

    • NATO is far more than a neighbourhood gang. It is the muscle for the bankers and their wars. Breaking up Yugoslavia was never about democracy, it was about privatizing government assets and setting up a distribution centre at Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo, for Afghan opium to be pushed through Europe by Albanian drug runners.


      Comment by curmudgeon49 | May 27, 2022 | Reply

  2. I am very surprised that the German tried in Nuremberg 1946 for war Crimes DIDN’T invoke “IMMUNITY CLAUSE” ?? They would have got off free …


    Comment by Mr Reynard | May 26, 2022 | Reply

    • Virtually all of the “War Crimes” at the Stalinist show trials in Nuremberg were ex post facto – crimes after the fact, meaning they were legal at the time of the commission. The Kangaroo Court was based on the London Protocols in which hearsay evidence was given judicial notice (accepted as fact and commonly understood) and the defendants being guilty until proven innocent. Former US Chief Supreme Court Harlan Fiske Stone called them a high class lynching. The All-Lies committed the same “crimes” and more.


      Comment by curmudgeon49 | May 27, 2022 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.