Aletho News


9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition

Physics and Reason  —  June 15, 2010

Any theory that does not match experiment is wrong. It doesn’t matter what the computer models predict, how much funding is behind it, what the experts say, or what everyone “thinks”.

Part 1

Part 2

June 20, 2010 - Posted by | Deception, False Flag Terrorism, Timeless or most popular, Video


  1. Brilliant vids! But you can bet your life there will be some debunker out there with some unintelligible, unscientific clap trap to deny simple schoolboy physics. Why do they insist on torturing themselves? Believing the truth is far less painful.

    Comment by Graham | September 12, 2011

  2. the collapse of WTC1, 2 and then later that day, WTC-7, were all classic and text book controlled demolitions, with one exception.

    as WTC-7 collapsed into it’s own footprint in perfect controlled demolition style, the same kind of collapse was not too very easy to orchestrate without more than just THERMITE to do the column cutting as seen in the debris after the collapses. Column after column were cut by thermite at angles easily seen by even the most blind eyes. however, the two WTC towers were essentially pulverized as well as brought down by core cutting charges. to pulverize concrete and push it sideways at high velocities so as to allow the free fall into their own footprint collapse to occur, required more than THERMITE. it required much more energetic high explosives to
    blow those concrete floors to smithereens because they couldn’t possibly be reduced to dust and powder strictly by falling.

    so here again, though NIST is full of shit, so are the folks who are claiming that THERMITE alone did those towers, which is not possible. most of the buildings below the damaged floors were cold hard uncompromised steel…barely a few degrees warmer than their normal temperatures before the planes struck. You cannot defy simple laws of thermodynamics that state that the cooler 90 plus percent of the building structure not affected by fire, were in fact a huge heat sink that drew away heat and prevented any possibility of the steel being weakened to allow a symmetric collapse of these buildings into their own footprints at freefall speeds.

    To get there, the massive amount of cold steel and concrete below the damaged sections had to be blown to kingdom come to get out of the way. Those structures were substantially strong enough to withstand the upper floor collapses in an asymmetric fashion and still remain standing had the planes actually done more damage than they possibly did that day. Ignoring this fact of life that 90 percent of these buildings were cold and undamaged by fire is a big big mistake. No raging inferno’s engulfed these buildings for hours. The fires were localized and went out pretty quickly after the impacts occurred. NYC fire teams reported they had them more or less contained when the demolitions charges then killed them and took the buildings down around them.

    you have to ask yourself how Barry Jennings walked thru a demolished lobby at WTC-7 while being escorted out by firemen who came to get him out…just seconds before the rest of the demolitions charges then took the building down that he just exited.

    Many eye and ear witnesses can attest to the detonations of scores of demolitions sequences in these buildings before they fell. The planes could not have taken these buildings down, nor caused WTC-7 to collapse as it did.

    THERMATE and other energetic, highly powerful explosives took down WTC 1 and WTC 2 on Sept. 11th., 2001. It wasn’t the piddly fires from the planes that were more or less extinguished or merely smouldering and not raging infernos as the neocons will have you believe.

    for people to dissuade testing personnel to test the dust for other constituent components of other much more powerful, higher energy explosives than THERMITE is, was an act of COVER UP by both NIST and their
    detractors over at AE911TRUTH.

    both organizations forbade their employees to test for the other explosives in that dust. Why?

    I don’t need to tell you why. You know why. and so do they.


  3. Our engineering schools have had TEN YEARS to do experiments.

    Where are they? They won’t even talk about the distributions of steel and concrete down the buildings.

    Comment by umbrarchist (@umbrarchist) | June 30, 2012

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.