Aletho News


Holocaust assignment unleashes Zionist’s rage

By Brandon Martinez | Press – TV | May 10, 2014

A California school district has come under fire from Zionist groups for giving students an assignment asking them to examine both sides of the “holocaust” story, draw their own conclusions based on the documentation provided as well as their own research and then write an essay about it.

The Rialto Unified School District near Los Angeles gave out the 18-page assignment to eighth grade students to encourage critical thinking, but the Zionists have unleashed their fury upon the school district’s administrators for daring to allow any debate on the sacred Shoah. Only one side of the holocaust story will be allowed to enter into the curriculum of learning institutions, says the Zionists.

The assignment’s introduction explained: “When tragic events occur in history, there is often debate about their actual existence. For example, some people claim the Holocaust is not an actual historical event, but instead is a propaganda tool that was used for political and monetary gain.” The assignment then instructs students to “read and discuss multiple, credible articles on this issue, and write an argumentative essay, based upon cited textual evidence, in which you explain whether or not you believe the Holocaust was an actual event in history, or merely a political scheme created to influence public emotion and gain wealth.”

According to the Zionist self-appointed arbiters of all historical truth, there is no “debate” about the realities of the holocaust because it is an event etched in stone that cannot be altered even slightly. This dogmatic approach to learning about history flies in the face of basic principles of logic, discernment and academic freedom.

The sycophantic dolt Chris Matthews addressed the controversy on his boring MSNBC show “Hardball,” bringing on a spokesman of the Zionist Simon Wiesenthal Center to feign outrage about the “monstrosity” of allowing students to decide for themselves what really happened in Germany’s concentration camps during the Second World War.

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the Simon Wiesenthal Center mouthpiece, told Matthews that the assignment “elevated hate with historic fact.” What one might discern from the rabbi’s incoherent statement is that historical facts are “hateful” in nature and even though they are true should be discarded or suppressed to avoid upsetting Jewish sensibilities.

Rabbi Cooper went on to assure MSNBC’s viewership that all of the eighth graders of the school district in question would be brow beaten into accepting the Zionist version of WW2. All 2,200 eighth grade students of Rialto, said the rabbi, will be forced to attend the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s “Museum of Tolerance” to get a good dousing of “holocaust” propaganda sure to pacify any doubts that they may have gleaned from the assignment.

What the students won’t be told is that the “Museum of Tolerance” was caught peddling an out-and-out hoax in the 1990s. Revisionist researcher David Cole recently exposed how the museum had set up a display purporting to showcase the function of the dubious “gas vans” that Zionists claim were used by the Germans to kill Jews in Eastern Europe during the war.

A looped video was presented to impressionable and gullible observers showing a re-enactment of the alleged killing procedure of the mystical “gas vans.” In a video published on YouTube, Cole explains that the museum’s video display claimed to be a selected segment from a “documentary” but was actually lifted from a 1962 fictional Polish film called “The Ambulance,” directed by Janusz Morgenstern.

On the MSNBC show, Rabbi Cooper suggests that there are only two types of people who would doubt the holocaust: 1) people who would like a chance to “finish the job,” and 2) “sophisticated bigots” who are more comfortable not having to deal with the reality of what happened.

Irrespective of Cooper’s delusions, the fact is that most holocaust skeptics are normal citizens who have decided to approach the subject from a scientific standpoint, not an emotional or ideological one. Chemists and experts like Germar Rudolf and Fred Leuchter did not begin their inquiries into the gas chamber claims with preconceived judgments or notions — they went into their investigations believing fully the official stories about mass gassings. After extensively observing the facilities claimed to be the gas chambers, these two qualified analysts came out as disbelievers.

Pointing out that in 1990 the Auschwitz State Museum reduced the death total there from 4 to 1 million, and that the real death total at that camp is probably still much lower than the latter figure, is not an “anti-Semitic” gesture, it is an honest one. Likewise, observing that the Majdanek and Mauthausen camps that were once said by establishment sources to harbour the remains of 3.5 million murdered Jews but are now said to be the resting places of less than 100,000 Jews, is not an act of malice but one of accuracy.

Delineating that the wartime atrocity stories of “human soap” and “skin lampshades” supposedly manufactured from Jewish corpses are patently false is not “elevating hate,” it is actually decreasing hate against the German people.

Emphasizing the discernable pattern of Zionist propaganda dating back to the late 1800s showing the repetitive dissemination of Jewish persecution stories, oftentimes invoking the mystical “six million” number, is not an exercise in “racism” but rather empirical observation.

The cartoonish “evil Nazi” archetype was created by the winners of WW2 in order to facilitate the cover up of massive Allied war crimes and to accelerate the Zionist agenda to invade and colonize Palestine under a facade of victimhood. Nazi Germany was no more evil than the Allied powers, no more racist than Britain or America or Zionist Jews themselves, and no more murderous than the countries that won that war and the nation born out of that war: Zionist Israel.

Someone wise once said that the truth is the first victim of war. Governments keen to justify their actions in a time of conflict and conflagration will stoop to any level of deceit and use every underhanded trick in the book to malign their adversaries.

Governments tell falsehoods with impunity when the people fail to think critically about what they are being told and the agenda that may lie behind it.

If we are to ever fully be free, we must cast aside the myths of the past that are currently being used to mentally enslave the masses of the present.

May 10, 2014 - Posted by | Deception, Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism, Mainstream Media, Warmongering, Timeless or most popular | ,


  1. An average age of eighth grade students is fourteen. I think it is implausible for a child to take a controversial stand on this issue because of the voluminous mass of unchallenged propaganda.
    USAns are in an impoverished position concerning holocaust “facts.”. Due to the many omissions, gory biographical stories that have been debunked still find fertile ground in youthful American minds.
    What fourteen year old will have the courage to defy conformity?
    Kudos to the teacher/s with the fortitude to encourage critical thinking!


    Comment by ruby22-kate | May 10, 2014 | Reply

    • That confirms what my father said “The prisoners got the horses head in soup some times and guards eat the bodies”
      I have trouble with giving money to Jews when nothing is given to young men and women that fought for freedom, they were shunned when promised by government that they would get back the jobs they had before going to war, government held the i


      Comment by richard123456columbia | May 11, 2014 | Reply

  2. My father was a Canadian soldier in Italy and was captured in northern Italy. He was a prisoner for 8 months in a concentration camp that was built to handle a few thousand but had over 13,000 in it. He quick,y realized that the bread that was like sawdust and a cup of milk for meals will not keep one alive very long, him and many men would go on work details to get a block of cheese and more milk, it would mean they should be able to out live the war. He told of a time that many men were paraded into a large truck trailer unit, he was trembling as he told the event and said that they all said to each other how did we let this happen as they seen nozzles sticking through the wall believing that they would be gassed but were being fumigated for lice that was always a problem to over come. One of the work details was to put the bodies in the furnaces and to save his mind he imagined that the bodies were 2×4’s and all his life he would go to a pile of 2×4’s and pat them into place. He never talked bad about the German people and said that the allies had blocked all resources from entering Germany including food so the German people were starving as well as them. The result was that nearing the end of the war the generals made an agreement to not kill the army prisoners in exchange for them to go to other countries and not be charged with war crimes. The civilians were not part of the deal so what would they do, let them starve to death or shoot them like most countries do in such cases as some would join the allies or give sensitive information to the allies. To show some things they did near the end was with my father and prisoners they marched them for miles in the coldest winter on record to keep the allies from freeing them, The day before the death march as papers reported it, the German guards went through the camps taking away 2000 of the in firmed and shoot them, during the march 2000 more were lost because they could not keep up. I asked my father about the Jews and he went blank and said he could not talk of the bad stuff that happened and said we treated them like lumber.
    Seeing that he thought he was going to be gassed, at that time they must of heard rummer s that gassing was happening but is starving people to death any better.


    Comment by richard123456columbia | May 10, 2014 | Reply

    • My father was an American pilot shot down and put into a stalag luft in Germany for war prisoners. While it wasn’t an extermination camp, he spoke of hopeless starvation toward the end of the war, when if they were lucky, German guards would find a cavalry horse head for them to make soup out of. Bone soup, he called it. He did manage to escape, but no matter how many times we asked, he would never talk about what he saw.

      Now they tattoo those who resist the Fascist Scientocracy with the ‘Denier’ armband, while the Scientocrats cleverly ’round the corners of the square, repeated the Big Lie over and over again, until it’s a bullseye on everyone’s back’, to loot the citizenry through energy tithes and gasoline taxes, exactly like the Nazis looted the lands they conquered, and said: ‘We won, you lost. It’s just business, get over it. Now get off my land!’

      When I taught Science, (as a career environmental engineer before I became a teacher), I made the effort to write challenging curriculum, asking the class to learn logic, debate, statistics, then asking them to apply their new-found ‘higher level thinking’ ability to some of the more blatantly bogus climate chains pogroms. But I was ratted out by one of my students, had to write apologies to all their parents, was told to ‘teach to the text’ from a ‘New Science’ book stating categorically that humans were responsible for everything: drought, too much rain, terrible heat, too much snow, crops won’t come up, plagues of locusts, the whole Old Testament schtick.

      The day will come, mark my words, when the tax plagues and perfidies Scientocrats wreak upon the citizens, destroying their homes, their livelihoods and their savings, will be recast in history books as ‘climate-caused’. Then we’ll be having holocaust dialogues, apres la Apocalypse Neuvo, …but the Scientocrats will have won.


      Comment by Chip Nikh | May 10, 2014 | Reply

  3. Reblogged this on TheFlippinTruth.


    Comment by joekano76 | May 10, 2014 | Reply

  4. Wonder what happened to the teacher. Dismissed, prosecuted, shot?


    Comment by traducteur | September 25, 2015 | Reply

  5. “Nazi Germany was no more evil than the Allied powers … ”
    I do believe that to be the most remarkable affirmation I have ever read on the Internet.
    Do you honestly believe that? Do you have data that will persuade me?
    The only thing that triumphed in 1945 was capitalism. Why don’t you say that?


    Comment by Sir Victor | May 3, 2019 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.