Aletho News


Online Thought Crimes: Cops Visit Critics of Dutch Migration Policy

Sputnik – 28.01.2016

Police in the Netherlands now prefer not to think twice before visiting homes of those who criticize a government policy on migrants, including via social networks, media reports said.

Critiquing the Dutch government’s policy on migrants via social networking websites and elsewhere is now considered a criminal offense in Holland. Dutch police have raided critics’ homes, media outlets reported, citing a recent mass protest in the town of Kaatsheuvel and how some citizens of the town of Sliedrecht had been targeted by the authorities for voicing their criticism of mass migration online.

Earlier this month, hundreds of residents of Kaatsheuvel took to the streets to protest the local authorities’ plans to house at least 1,200 migrants in their town. They carried placards with slogans reading “You do not belong here” and “No to the refugees.”

The government retaliated by sending local police to the addresses of those who had participated in the protest and inspecting their social media accounts.

A police spokesperson admitted that visits to the protesters and requests to delete anti-government posts on social networking websites are “unusual” practices, but maintained that police will continue to monitor the protesters’ accounts in order to uncover the further intentions of their authors.

In an interview with RT, one of the protesters said that police had arrived at his door and asked him if he wanted to remove his Facebook post criticizing the authorities’ migrant asylum policy.

“But my message has already disappeared, and I think it was [removed] earlier by police or Facebook itself. A police officer told me that apart from me, he was due to visit five more protesters. They want us to keep mum and refrain from discussing the topic,” he said.

Robin Tilbrook, leader of the English Democrats Party condemned the activity of the Dutch police as illegal.

“Trying to shut people’s mouths is a totally undemocratic and possibly illegal approach. This is nothing but an attempt to bully people who simply expressed concern about the situation [with migrants],” Tilbrook said.

Meanwhile, the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant has reported that in the past few months, more asylum seekers have voluntarily left the Netherlands, in what can be seen as a show of disappointment with the country’s system for granting refugees asylum.According to the newspaper, about 3,000 asylum seekers decided to leave the Netherlands in 2015. The newspaper said that the main reason for their disappointment was that obtaining refugee status had been too time consuming and left them with few guarantees that they would be reunited with their families.

January 28, 2016 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Full Spectrum Dominance | ,

1 Comment »

  1. Having critique on the policies on housing refugees is NOT a criminal offense in the Netherlands, throwing fireworks, stones and other heavy material to police officers who safeguard the normal ongoings of a public meeting were citizens were informed about the creation of a refugee camp IS a criminal offense!

    In addition, sending envelopes with bullets in them is a criminal offense too, as is setting fire to cars of officials who are member of city-councils were refugee-camps are proposed!

    Reporting on matters related to and with refugees is OK, reporting on matters related with refugees in a way and manner that falsely describes the going on’s is NOT ok, and is commonly regarded as hate-mongering!

    The examples given are out of context, and the background is false!

    The individuals referred to as being falsely accused of criminal offenses are no citizens of the referred to cities, and the practices of vandalism by these individuals are indeed criminal!
    The individuals referred to in the article should be sentenced to minimally 10 year imprisonment, have their civil rights taken away, and be in addition be sentenced to paying ALL costs that were the result of their acts!

    When the writer would have investigated the matter carefully, and then would have come forward with some knowledge of the facts, there would have been respect, now there is only disrespect and laughter!


    Comment by masteradrian | January 28, 2016 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.