Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Tensions escalating between US and North Korea

By Lucas Leiroz | June 25, 2021

Since March, the situation between the US and North Korea has been gradually worsening. That month, American Chancellor Antony Blinken took his first international trip, whose destinations were Japan and South Korea, where conversations with local leaders about North Korea were carried out. On the occasion, Blinken highlighted alleged human rights violations in the country and the “threat” posed by the North Korean nuclear program to international security in that Asian region.

He stated that Washington, Tokyo and Seoul will work together to achieve the denuclearization of Pyongyang, which was taken as a threat by the North Korean government, leading to immediate responses such as the launch of two ballistic missiles into the Sea of Japan and a warning issued by the sister of the supreme leader, Kim Yo Jong, who said that “if it [the US ] wants to sleep in peace for the coming four years, it had better refrain from causing a stink at its first step”.

Reports issued by US military and intelligence agents in April stated that North Korea has more nuclear weapons than ever and is unwilling to give up its arsenal, prompting the US government to make constant pronouncements on the need of denuclearization, claiming that this is the only condition for dialogue between the two countries. In early June, Kim appeared in public commenting that the Biden government has a “hostile policy” towards North Korea. On June 12, during a meeting of the Central Military Commission of the Worker’s Party of Korea, Kim called for measures to boost military combat effectiveness, warning of new challenges on the Korean peninsula.

Despite continuing to respond to Biden’s impositions with severe displays of force, resuming military tests and claiming to be prepared for an eventual conflict, one factor has harmed Korea considerably: the food crisis. Kim Jong Un recently made remarks about the country’s current supply crisis, warning of a serious food insecurity situation – the worst in decades. The effects of the pandemic hit the country at the same time that several natural disasters damaged agriculture and generated serious instability in grain production. At the end of May, China announced that it would economically help Korea by increasing trade with the country, but the crisis is still far from being resolved.

In his most recent speech, last week, Kim said that Korea is prepared for both confrontation and dialogue, showing signs that, while not giving up on its interests, it is willing to talk with Biden and reach an agreement to ease tensions – which would help Korea at this time of crisis. But the US government was not sensitive to the situation in the Asian country. Blinken responded to the Korean leader’s speech by saying Washington is waiting for “a clearer signal from Pyongyang.” What would be a clearer signal than the country’s president saying he is prepared for dialogue? It would be precisely Kim claiming that he is willing to give up on his nuclear program.

North Korea reduced the bellicose speech it had been maintaining since March and received nothing in return from Washington. The most curious point is that Kim sought a more neutral stance precisely at a time of intensified tensions between the US and China. At the last NATO summit, China was considered a “global security challenge”, being treated in an anti-diplomatic way. Beijing is the biggest ally of the Korean government and all measures against China affect Pyongyang in some way.

Pyongyang will react to the American stance by canceling any willingness to dialogue and tightening military policies, at least as long as the country is able to maintain such measures. Still, it is possible that Biden will take advantage of Korea’s moment of vulnerability to act even more militarily. An open confrontation is unlikely to happen as no conflict between two nuclear-armed states is viable, but demonstrations of force such as tests, missile launches, and symbolic naval warfare are possible scenarios for the near future. Also, such measures would be a proxy confrontation with China, which is allied with North Korea.

In short, Biden is reversing a great positive legacy of the Trump era, which was the achievement of partial stability in US-North Korea relations. The former government has shown that coercion and force are not the most effective methods of pursuing the denuclearization of a country. But Biden’s policy seems to follow an old bellicose mentality that is absolutely unproductive today.

Lucas Leiroz is a research fellow in international law at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

June 25, 2021 - Posted by | Militarism | ,

3 Comments »

  1. “Blinken highlighted alleged human rights violations in the country and the “threat” posed by the North Korean nuclear program to international security in that Asian region”.

    Blinken, another “Dual Passport Holder” with 1st allegiance to Israel wants to rid Nth Korea of its ‘Nukes’ and Human rights issues huh? I suppose he didn’t mention Israel’s Nuclear arsenal(and please don’t give us any of the “Israel neither confirms or denies” rubbish). And of course, he wouldn’t have mentioned the human rights abuses by Israel against the Palestinians.
    Blinken(Stein?) has Zero credibility in this world. Only in the USA and his beloved Israel, and the rest of the World can see it for what it is, Balderdash!!

    Aren’t the American people hugely embarrassed by all these “Israel Firsters” supposedly representing the USA on the World stage? I mean, even the American President is being recognised as a “Brain Dead Idiot” around the World.
    Take your country back, America.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by brianharryaustralia | June 25, 2021 | Reply

  2. I hope I can make a connection here, even sort of tenuously, so bear with me.  Yesterday/25th I learned that the UNGA had, on 6-23, for the 29th consecutive year, demanded the end of the US embargo of Cuba.  The vote was 184-2 in favor (guess who the other scofflaw “Nay” was…), with 3 genuflecting/ass-kissing abstentions:  Brazil, Colombia, Ukraine.  I immediately wrote via their websites to each of the four pol-prostitutes representing (sic) my state and demanded to know (with follow-on elucidating details re crippling economic sanctions, bellicosity, boasting, lies, etc.) “What in God’s name is wrong with us? What in Hell is wrong with us? [Is it Zionist/Fascist Israel that is wrong with us?]”  Understandably, no response at this early date, and I expect none.

    Here, re the PRNK, I can ask essentially the same question:  “WTF is wrong with us? — a no-diplomacy terror-state that is the scourge/enemy of humanity to most of the rest of the planet?”

    I hate my country.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by roberthstiver | June 27, 2021 | Reply

    • It is SO obvious, the enormous control that Israel holds over the USA. Have a look through the people in positions of HIGH POWER in the USA, and Israel’s influence is overwhelming. You cannot have loyalty to two countries at the same time. But, such is the influence these people have means that they control the House, the Congress AND The White House.
      “Game, set and Match”…….and, “Sleepy Joe Biden” will be putty in their hands.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by brianharryaustralia | June 27, 2021 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.