Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

UK law commission recommends making speech offenses based on “likely psychological harm”

The vague terms used to suppress speech

By Didi Rankovic | Reclaim the Net | July 22, 2021

Recommendations unveiled by the UK’s Law Commission are seeking to establish a new offense by criminalizing communications that could cause “likely psychological harms.”

Another offense that is recommended in the document concerns “knowingly false communications.” This is a serious threat to freedom of expression, and a chance for the authorities to get the last word on what is perceived as true and false.

The recommendation defines “harm” as something that causes “serious distress,” while “psychological harm” is also being mentioned. As for defining “serious distress” – the Commission refers to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

The proposed reforms are aimed at protecting victims of online abuse, but there are fears that the vague language and prioritizing subjective perception of speech over objective content could have dangerous consequences.

And the fact that identity and characteristics of the recipient of a communication is also given center stage leaves the door wide open for censorship based on identity politics.

Ironically, in presenting and explaining the recommendations, the Commission justifies them as necessary to right precisely the wrongs that critics are now pointing out this type of reform could introduce. Namely, the Commission says that rules that currently define what constitutes for serious crimes from online abuse are “vague” and sometimes interfere with free speech.

“Grossly offensive” and “indecent” are some examples of what the Commission sees as “vague” – and they would instead “clarify” matters by criminalizing “likely psychological harm.”

Earlier drafts of the recommendations even toyed with the idea of criminalizing communications that are perceived as causing “emotional distress.”

And the document’s authors claim that their take on how to better protect people from abuse online will actually protect freedom of expression more effectively. The rationale here is that the proposals would narrow the reach of the criminal law – rather than, as those critical of the whole thing say, set a very low threshold.

The organization’s Criminal Law Commissioner Penney Lewis is quoted as saying that the goal of the recommendations is to prevent “untold harm” that can arise from online behavior, singling out cyberflashing and pile-on harassment.

People found to be “knowingly” posting false communications would face criminal charges if their action is found to have caused “non-trivial emotional, psychological, or physical harm to the likely audience, without a reasonable excuse.”

July 22, 2021 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Full Spectrum Dominance | ,

4 Comments »

  1. UK law commission recommends making speech offenses based on “likely psychological harm”

    I find that statement DEPRESSING!

    Like

    Comment by Pip | July 22, 2021 | Reply

  2. Given the stream of lies that come out of successive British Politicians(and American, Australian and ALL other countries) these laws might come back and bite THEM on the Arse(Ass). Anyone remember “Weapons of Mass Destruction”? They cause a lots of “psychological harm, didn’t they?

    Like

    Comment by brianharryaustralia | July 22, 2021 | Reply

  3. What is “non trivial physiological or physical harm”????

    Like

    Comment by Sarah | July 22, 2021 | Reply

  4. The BS will end when the political filth is straitjacketed, imprisoned and then executed. Otherwise prepare to live in a permanent kafaesque madhouse where the loons will poke you with sticks in the eyes until we all snap.

    The herd has found out in just 18 months that they have precisely those rights that they are prepared to kill and die for. In the case of the covaids death jab…zilch. Next we are up when the death squad goons come.

    Onward to Ouch Witz where the joke is on the sheeple.
    Pfizer macht frei.
    Same as it ever waZ

    Like

    Comment by Martillo | July 23, 2021 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.