Aletho News


Fauci Goes to Princeton


Last month, I went to Princeton to protest the University’s “Class Day” speaker, Tony Fauci. It astounded me that students would invite someone who stole over two years of their college experiences and young lives. By selecting Fauci, Princeton students showed that they’re celebrity worshipers, not critical thinkers.

The students certainly didn’t vet Fauci by reading RFK Jr.’s The Real Anthony Fauci, which reveals how corrupt, hostile and destructive this Napoleonic tyrant is. The Princeton grads I know are all Groupthinkers. Most tend not to speak well in English, much less in a second language. Like Fauci, they’re very overrated.

I was among a dozen protesters who displayed signs as we stood on the Nassau Street sidewalk just outside the campus gates. My sign had two sides, One side said, “Vaxxes Did Not Stop the Spread.” The other side said, “Hopkins Study (February, 2022): Fauci Lied.”

Fauci recently claimed that lockdowns, masks, tests and “vaccines” had saved many lives. The Hopkins study shredded this notion and observed that Faucist “mitigation” strategies have caused tremendous, lasting harm.

Many drivers who passed us honked approvingly. Numerous strangers approached and expressed agreement with us or passed by with thumbs up. Some said they bought the fear for a month until they began to change their minds. I’ve heard that often, and never understood it. The powergrab was obvious from Day 1. Why lock down healthy people for the first time in human history when only a tiny fraction of some very old, very sick people had—at least purportedly—died from this infection?

Lockdowners never presented evidence that would have sustained a reasonable burden of proof. Allowing Coronamania to begin, unchallenged, was a massive error. Once this started, it became entrenched.

While many Americans complain, only a tiny percentage will actively protest. I’ve been to half a dozen Corona rallies over the past two years. Most were lightly attended. It’s pathetic that so many Americans have passively tolerated this nonsense.

I asked those who heard the speech and mocked Fauci when we met by the campus entrance if they had booed him. They said they didn’t. When I asked why, they said they didn’t want to upset other people; as if, after having seen the world opportunistically, permanently damaged by 27 months of Faucism, booing would have been indelicate. People accepted profound mistreatment in order to avoid conflict.

After all this time, some fools still buy Coronamania. Some ceremony-goers walked past, wearing masks. A few cast disapproving glances that they mistakenly thought would bother us protesters. Some passersby also muttered unintelligibly. A fellow protester noted, “They always say shit as they’re walking away.”

We protesters were kept too far from the speech to hear it. So I read the text on-line. First, though others have lambasted Fauci’s AIDs work, Fauci portrayed himself as a heroic public servant during that era. Second, he asserted that systemic racism caused Covid to kill more minorities. Finally, he warned that Covid showed us to avoid purveyors of “misinformation.”

Fauci delivered a self-revealing meta-message to college grads: when your work product sucks, gaslight and resort to name-calling and PC demagoguery. His stated concern about misinformation is painfully ironic, as it comes from someone who has lied his way through the past two years and, according to peers, many years prior.

Playing the race card, Fauci pointed out that minorities unfairly had to work during the pandemic because many were “essential workers.” But didn’t Fauci recommend that essential workers should continue working? Do the stats back his facile claim that too many minorities were essential workers; weren’t there tens of millions of White essential workers? And how many healthy, working-age people—of any race or ethnicity—died of Coronavirus? Facts don’t constrain Fauci. He’s the consummate tropester. And he was playing to a trope-hungry crowd.

Further, while I know the vaxxes are ineffective at best, Fauci still inaccurately maintains that the vaxxes work great. He often lied that those who didn’t vaxx had created “a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.” Yet, during his speech he declined to mention the lower vaxx rates among minorities, despite that the shots were aggressively promoted, and free. A disproportionate number of minorities, cf., majority populations, defied Fauci’s exhortation and astutely knew not to go along.

The Eighteenth Century British writer, Samuel Johnson, and Bob Dylan both said that “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” The same is true of Fauci’s showy anti-racism. To obscure his venal misconduct and terrible record, Fauci touts himself as a champion of minorities. But how many urban/rural minorities does Fauci know? Do you think his kids went to school with Hispanic or Black kids? Doesn’t he think he’s better, and deserves to be paid far more, than minority essential workers?

Fauci also neglected to mention a May 5, 2022 Harvard study that predictably concluded that the Covid school closures he endorsed had disparately harmed minority students.

Hearing the biggest liar since Pinocchio call others “misinformers” is gruesome. Aside from his demonstrably false statements about the vaxxes’ purported effectiveness and safety, and the lockdown and school closure effects, Fauci also said masks worked, although all serious evidence shows they don’t.

Fauci also stated that he didn’t fund gain-of-function research, though he did. He repeatedly relied on high cycle PCR tests to measure “cases,” when even the test’s inventor, Kary Mullis, and the NY Times said that they shouldn’t be. Additionally, Fauci wrongly predicted that motorcycle rallies and college football games would be super-spreader events. All of these assertions—and many more—were obvious misinformation.

A decent attorney or interviewer would easily expose Fauci’s pervasive dishonesty. But he’s hidden himself from those who know what a fraud he is, and the bought media has never asked him any serious questions. He’s repeatedly lied for 27 months while making a series of absurd recommendations that some people, like Princeton grads, still somehow take seriously. A Class Day website photo shows the fully-jabbed graduating sheep giddily bumping elbows with their diminutive Dear Leader.

A brush with someone famous! I must post this on Instagram! Dopamine rush! I am… somebody!

Twenty-seven months into this, a mandated truth-serum injection might have prompted Fauci to make the following remarks, instead of those he actually made:

Esteemed, albeit naive, Class of 2022, et al.:

I know that your college experience sucked. You sat in front of screens most of the time and you could’ve done that at home. Two years that should have been special are gone forever. But eff you all. Your entire generation is expendable. I wanted to oust Trump. He deserved it because he was too stupid to know I was spouting nonsense and he let me run the show.

Two weeks to flatten the curve; wear double masks; take tests that yield up to 90% false positives; avoid funerals and cancel weddings because you might spread “droplets;” ignore natural immunity and take your mandated jabs, even if they’ve not only failed but are injuring and even killing people; and boost up multiple times—I’ll tell you how many. Becauss (I pronounce that word oddly) I’m the Soy-ence! (That word, too).

You believed all that, and much more, without asking any questions. Because that’s what excellent college students, such as those at Princeton, do. It’s more important to have people like you than it is to seek the truth. How do you express that aphorism in Latin? (This is an allusion to a pretentious/whimsical Princeton tradition).

I’ve loved this two-year power trip. I always wanted to be on TV and I got to do that often with fawning, mindless, bought interviewers. I even got to throw a ceremonial first pitch at a baseball game. I’ll bet you didn’t know I consider myself a good athlete.

I’ve become a multi-millionaire working for the government despite doing an awful job. Although I’m elfin, evil and dishonest, people bow down to me because I dish out the grant money that’s the lifeblood of academic sycophants. Whatever you end up doing, try to make and control a lot of cash, congratulate yourself and speak in PC cliches. If you do, you can con people into calling you “successful” and even an “expert” and a “public servant.” Class of 2022, you’re ideally suited to become tools who just might worsen the deep, vast damage I’ve done. But I doubt you can top me.

So long, suckers. As Otter said at the end of that college movie classic, Animal House, “You effed up. You trusted us.”

June 4, 2022 - Posted by | Corruption, Deception | ,



    Randomized Controlled Trial
    Int J Infect Dis
    . 2021 Feb;103:214-216.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.191. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
    A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness
    Sabeena Ahmed 1 , Mohammad Mahbubul Karim 1 , Allen G Ross 1 , Mohammad Sharif Hossain 1 , John D Clemens 1 , Mariya Kibtiya Sumiya 1 , Ching Swe Phru 1 , Mustafizur Rahman 1 , Khalequ Zaman 1 , Jyoti Somani 2 , Rubina Yasmin 3 , Mohammad Abul Hasnat 4 , Ahmedul Kabir 5 , Asma Binte Aziz 1 , Wasif Ali Khan 6
    PMID: 33278625
    PMCID: PMC7709596
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.191
    Free PMC article

    Ivermectin, a US Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-parasitic agent, was found to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in vitro. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to determine the rapidity of viral clearance and safety of ivermectin among adult SARS-CoV-2 patients. The trial included 72 hospitalized patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh, who were assigned to one of three groups:
    oral ivermectin alone (12 mg once daily for 5 days),
    oral ivermectin in combination with doxycycline (12 mg ivermectin single dose and 200 mg doxycycline on day 1, followed by 100 mg every 12 h for the next 4 days), and a placebo control group.

    Clinical symptoms of fever, cough, and sore throat were comparable among the three groups.
    Virological clearance was earlier in the 5-day ivermectin treatment arm when compared to the placebo group (9.7 days vs 12.7 days; p = 0.02), but this was not the case for the ivermectin + doxycycline arm (11.5 days; p = 0.27).
    There were no severe adverse drug events recorded in the study.
    A 5-day course of ivermectin was found to be safe and effective in treating adult patients with mild COVID-19.
    Larger trials will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
    Keywords: Bangladesh; COVID-19; Doxycycline; Ivermectin; SARS-CoV-2.
    Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

    Conflict of interest statement
    The authors declare that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work described in this paper.
    Figure 1
    Figure 1
    Cumulative viral recovery estimates in…
    Comment in
    Antiviral Effects of Ivermectin in COVID-19- Clinically Plausible?
    Shukla DAK, Misra DS. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;109:91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.048. Epub 2021 Jun 24. PMID: 34175482 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

    Similar articles
    Ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 (IVERCOR-COVID19): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Vallejos J, Zoni R, Bangher M, Villamandos S, Bobadilla A, Plano F, Campias C, Chaparro Campias E, Achinelli F, Guglielmone HA, Ojeda J, Medina F, Farizano Salazar D, Andino G, Ruiz Diaz NE, Kawerin P, Meza E, Dellamea S, Aquino A, Flores V, Martemucci CN, Vernengo MM, Martinez SM, Segovia JE, Aguirre MG. Trials. 2020 Nov 24;21(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04813-1. PMID: 33234158 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
    The SARS-CoV-2 Ivermectin Navarra-ISGlobal Trial (SAINT) to Evaluate the Potential of Ivermectin to Reduce COVID-19 Transmission in low risk, non-severe COVID-19 patients in the first 48 hours after symptoms onset: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized control pilot trial.
    Chaccour C, Ruiz-Castillo P, Richardson MA, Moncunill G, Casellas A, Carmona-Torre F, Giráldez M, Mota JS, Yuste JR, Azanza JR, Fernández M, Reina G, Dobaño C, Brew J, Sadaba B, Hammann F, Rabinovich R. Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04421-z. PMID: 32513289 Free PMC article.
    Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Emadi A, Chua JV, Talwani R, Bentzen SM, Baddley J. Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9. PMID: 33115543 Free PMC article.
    Potential use of ivermectin for the treatment and prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Cobos-Campos R, Apiñaniz A, Parraza N, Cordero J, García S, Orruño E. Curr Res Transl Med. 2021 Oct;69(4):103309. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2021.103309. Epub 2021 Aug 11. PMID: 34418758 Free PMC article. Review.
    Ivermectin: an award-winning drug with expected antiviral activity against COVID-19.
    Formiga FR, Leblanc R, de Souza Rebouças J, Farias LP, de Oliveira RN, Pena L. J Control Release. 2021 Jan 10;329:758-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 7. PMID: 33038449 Free PMC article. Review.
    See all similar articles
    Cited by 71 articles
    Nitric Oxide in the Management of Respiratory Consequences in COVID-19: A Scoping Review of a Different Treatment Approach.
    Ghosh A, Joseph B, Anil S. Cureus. 2022 Apr 5;14(4):e23852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23852. eCollection 2022 Apr. PMID: 35530860 Free PMC article. Review.
    Clinical progress of therapeutics and vaccines: Rising hope against COVID-19 treatment.
    Bandaru R, Rout SR, Kamble OS, Samal SK, Gorain B, Sahebkar A, Ahmed FJ, Kesharwani P, Dandela R. Process Biochem. 2022 Jul;118:154-170. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 Apr 14. PMID: 35437418 Free PMC article.
    Red blood cell-hitchhiking mediated pulmonary delivery of ivermectin: Effects of nanoparticle properties.
    Zheng J, Lu C, Ding Y, Zhang J, Tan F, Liu J, Yang G, Wang Y, Li Z, Yang M, Yang Y, Gong W, Gao C. Int J Pharm. 2022 May 10;619:121719. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121719. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PMID: 35390488 Free PMC article.
    Identification of host transcriptome-guided repurposable drugs for SARS-CoV-1 infections and their validation with SARS-CoV-2 infections by using the integrated bioinformatics approaches.
    Ahmed FF, Reza MS, Sarker MS, Islam MS, Mosharaf MP, Hasan S, Mollah MNH. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266124. eCollection 2022. PMID: 35390032 Free PMC article.
    Can anti-parasitic drugs help control COVID-19?
    Panahi Y, Dadkhah M, Talei S, Gharari Z, Asghariazar V, Abdolmaleki A, Matin S, Molaei S. Future Virol. 2022 Mar:10.2217/fvl-2021-0160. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2021-0160. Epub 2022 Mar 18. PMID: 35359702 Free PMC article. Review.
    See all “Cited by” articles

    Alam M.T., Murshed R., Bhiuyan E., Saber S., Alam R., Robin R. A Case Series of 100 COVID-19 Positive Patients Treated with Combination of Ivermectin and Doxycycline. J Bangladesh Coll Physic Surg. 2020;38:10–15. doi: 10.3329/jbcps.v38i0.47512. – DOI
    Caly L., Druce J.D., Catton M.G., Jans D.A., Wagstaff K.M. 2020. “The FDA-approved Drug Ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antiviral Res, from (Caly et al. 2020), Apr 3. – PMC – PubMed
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2020. Interim Clinical Guidance for Management of Patients with Confirmed 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Infection, Updated March 7, 2020. [Available from:… [accessed 17.11.2020]
    Chiu S.H., Lu A.Y. Metabolism and tissue residues. In: Campbell W.C., editor. Ivermectin and Abamectin. Springer-Verlag; New York, NY: 1989. pp. 131–143.
    Johns Hopkins University of Medicine COVID-19 . 2020. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. (accessed 17.11.2020)
    Lespine A., Alvinerie M., Sutra J.F., Pors I., Chartier C. Influence of the route of administration on efficacy and tissue distribution of ivermectin in goat. Vet Parasitol. 2005;128:251–260. – PubMed
    Rajter J.C., Sherman M.S., Fatteh N., Vogel F., Sacks J., Rajter J.J. ICON (Ivermectin in COvid Nineteen) study: use of ivermectin is associated with lower mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020;2020 06.06.20124461. – PMC – PubMed
    Wu C., Liu Y., Yang Y. Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.02.008. – DOI – PMC – PubMed


    Comment by Pip | June 4, 2022 | Reply

  2. Prison and judging from the pic, a homosexual, pussycat prison.


    Comment by 5 dancing shlomos | June 4, 2022 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.