Aletho News


Is the US about to conduct a nuclear false flag in Ukraine and blame Russia for it?

By Drago Bosnic | May 2, 2023

The United States is the only country in history to have used all three types of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, biological, chemical), starting with the atomic bombings of Japan in the closing months of the Second World War to mass usage of chemical and biological weapons against numerous other countries it has attacked ever since (particularly Vietnam). And yet, the belligerent thalassocracy just adores chest-thumping about its supposed “morality” and even “warns” that its geopolitical adversaries are about to use such weapons (naturally, without ever providing any evidence). This is precisely what’s been happening in Ukraine in recent weeks.

On April 28, one of the most prominent neoliberal mouthpieces, the New York Times, ran a story about America setting up numerous radiation sensors across Ukraine in order to detect nuclear blasts. The NYT claims that “such sensors can detect‌‌ bursts of radiation from a nuclear weapon or a dirty bomb and can confirm the identity of the attacker”. It adds that “the goal is to make sure that if Russia detonates a radioactive weapon on Ukrainian soil, its atomic signature and Moscow’s culpability could be verified”, further claiming that “…experts have worried about whether President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia would use nuclear arms in combat for the first time since the American bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945″.

Firstly, it should be noted that Russia has a very clear doctrine about the usage of WMDs in an armed conflict, one that has even been updated recently and that states in what sort of situations Moscow would use such weapons. The Ukrainian conflict is still nowhere near a point where Russian WMDs could be used. Secondly, the Russian military dominates the battlefield, inflicting enormous losses on the Kiev regime forces. Even in the case of the much-touted offensive against newly integrated Russian regions in the Donbass and former southern Ukraine, Russia wouldn’t use nuclear weapons. However, the NYT claims precisely that is the case, supposedly because Russia is “desperate” to stop the attack.

Expectedly, “experts” the NYT allegedly spoke to are anonymous and they claim that the goal is to “prevent Russia from conducting a possible dirty bomb false flag in Ukraine”. The operation is officially run by the Nuclear Emergency Support Team (NEST), part of the Nation Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Interestingly, the NYT notes, citing a 2009 book “Defusing Armageddon” by Jeffrey T. Richelson, that “the NEST often teamed up with the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), an elite military unit so secretive that the Pentagon for years refused to acknowledge its existence”. It should be noted that JSOC is being used to conduct covert operations of all kinds across the world, including false flags.

So, according to these so-called “experts”, we are supposed to believe that US agencies and military units involved in actual false flag operations around the globe will prevent an alleged “Russian false flag” and not use the opportunity to conduct yet another covert op to fake such an event and then blame Russia for it? The NYT itself claims that “Moscow could falsely claim that Kyiv set off a nuclear blast on the battlefield to try to draw the West into deeper war assistance” and that “…in theory, with the sensor network in place, Washington would be able to point to its own nuclear attribution analyses to reveal that Moscow was in fact the attacker”.

The NYT then parrots the usual about Russia’s supposed “battlefield failures” that are “making Mr. Putin, if anything, more dependent on his nuclear arsenal” and how this “could increase his willingness to pull the nuclear trigger”. Even though such claims are laughable to anyone familiar with the actual situation on the battlefield, in the minds of rabid Russophobes this makes “perfect sense”. In addition, recent weeks have seen a dramatic surge in the Kiev regime’s attacks on civilians not only in the Donbass and other newly integrated Russian regions, but also in areas such as Bryansk and Belgorod oblasts (regions), with dozens of civilian casualties.

All this would be used to push the narrative that Russia could indeed be the alleged culprit behind a dirty bomb false flag. On the other hand, back in October last year, when Moscow warned that the Kiev regime might use a dirty bomb and then blame Russia for it, the political West rejected it all as a “conspiracy theory”. According to their “logic”, it’s only Russia that could do such a thing, because the Neo-Nazi junta, as a “true beacon of freedom and democracy”, certainly has the “moral high ground”. Additionally, the mainstream propaganda machine usually claims that the Kiev regime doesn’t have the capacity to create dirty bombs, so it allegedly couldn’t do it even if it wanted to.

However, recent reports about “sensitive US nuclear technologies” in (former) Ukrainian nuclear power plants (NPPs) show such claims are patently false. Russia controls one of such NPPs, but still hasn’t disclosed what sort of covert US support the Neo-Nazi junta got. Washington DC itself has “demanded” Moscow to return these “sensitive US nuclear technologies”, meaning they are worried about what might be revealed to the world. It’s not unlikely Russia is keeping the evidence secret for the time being as a possible deterrent to US and Kiev regime’s plan on detonating such a device and then blaming Moscow, which could simply reveal the evidence in case a dirty bomb is used.

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst.

May 2, 2023 - Posted by | False Flag Terrorism, Mainstream Media, Warmongering, Russophobia | , ,


  1. No, I disagree here.
    The US is not that stupid. The most (but still stupid action) it may do is to blow up a nuclear reactor and blame Russia for that. However that false flag operation may be easily revealed and back-fire on it; it won’t risk doing that (Look at the Nord-Streams incident.).

    However, one of its immoral, more crafty, non-NATO, non-European “ally” may pull such a stunt to extract more American aids and more benefit from the war. That would be the real risk.


    Comment by tonytran2015 | May 2, 2023 | Reply

  2. From Executive Intelligence Review News Service April 30, 2023
    RUSI’s Latest Scheme To Unleash Total War Against Russia
    The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI ) released a new report on April 28, “Dangerous Targets: Civilian Nuclear Infrastructure and the War in Ukraine,” which states that Russia may “manufacture a radiological incident,” at the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), to “spoil” a Ukrainian counter-offensive, even though there is no evidence that this is being—or has ever been—considered by the Russians as a strategy. The raising of this scenario twice in the report’s Executive Summary may indicate that it is something RUSI contemplates charging Russia with, or perhaps have Ukrainian forces, or NATO secretive operatives carry out as a “false flag” operation, which would bring on a total, likely nuclear confrontation between NATO and Russia.

    The RUSI report couches itself in concern for the safety of the nuclear plants in Ukraine, asserting that “over the past year, Russia’s military activity in Ukraine has resulted in serious threats to the safety and security of Ukraine’s nuclear infrastructure….” After listing a series of purported risks that could produce a Chernobyl-like disaster (April 26, 1986), it states: “Finally, the possibility that Russia may manufacture a radiological incident at the ZNPP or another facility to spoil a Ukrainian offensive should not be disregarded.”

    The RUSI report admits that “there is no current indication that Russia is planning to carry out strikes intentionally targeting Ukrainian nuclear power plants, although the option of nuclear sabotage in Ukraine appears to have been considered by Moscow.”

    How to respond to the (non-existent) threat? “Establish deterrence against a deliberately manufactured radiological incident by making clear to Russia that any such incident would be followed by a massive response to mitigate damage and expanded support for Ukraine’s war effort.” Given RUSI’s track record, that “massive response” clearly includes NATO’s direct involvement in the fighting, up to and including launching nuclear provocations.

    Recall that Malcolm Chalmers, the deputy director of RUSI, in a RUSI report published May 20, 2022 entitled “This War Still Presents Nuclear Risks—Especially in Relation to Crimea,” methodically discusses how Russia could be forced into a nuclear confrontation with NATO in Crimea, from which, he assumes, Russia would ultimately back down.

    The RUSI mad schemers are closely linked to the British Royal Household. The long-standing President of RUSI is “His Royal Highness the Duke of Kent.” The Duke of Kent is Prince Edward of the House of Windsor, first cousin of the late Queen Elizabeth, and also a first cousin of the late Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, in the inner circle of the family, and one of only about six people authorized to speak, either publicly or privately, for the Windsors. Lord Louis Mountbatten years ago led a campaign to elevate the status of RUSI, of which he was a member. Mountbatten was the last Viceroy of India, and he played an important role in raising King Charles when he was a child.


    Comment by Thomas Lee Simpson | May 2, 2023 | Reply

  3. Sorry, tonytran, the US IS that stupid, and that corrupt and evil.

    I have actually been expecting this for quite awhile now, and surprised it hasn’t actually happened yet, but then, my online writings prove I knew a covid/false flag event was coming.

    In August 2019.

    By October, I’d learned from a 20-year ex-special Forces vet’ it would be a ‘virus scare’.

    The rest, as they say, is history. And why I also NEVER, NOT ONCE, put a mask on for this hoax, because the government told me how dangerous it was, so I knew it wasn’t.

    If you pay attention, you’ll soon see the US government LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING.


    Comment by Occams | May 2, 2023 | Reply

  4. Wouldn’t doubt it. Isn’t FJB’s regime is completely insane?


    Comment by Sink | May 2, 2023 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: