Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

FAUCI’S INNER CIRCLE JUMPING SHIP

The HighWire with Del Bigtree | August 27, 2026

The legal pressure surrounding the COVID origins controversy continues to build. Jefferey follows newly surfaced emails, shifting alliances, and the growing list of figures facing uncomfortable questions about what happened behind the scenes.

August 29, 2026 Posted by | Corruption, Deception, Science and Pseudo-Science, Video | , | Comments Off on FAUCI’S INNER CIRCLE JUMPING SHIP

Coroner Contradicts Pennsylvania Health Officials, Says Measles Didn’t Cause Newborn’s Death

By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D. | The Defender | August 27, 2026

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro stood in Lancaster County on Tuesday and announced two “measles-associated deaths” — the first the commonwealth has reported in 35 years — calling them “preventable” and urging residents to get vaccinated.

Within a day, the county’s own coroner publicly disputed the state’s characterization.

On Tuesday, a Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) press release reported two measles-associated deaths in unvaccinated Lancaster County residents. The department initially withheld the individuals’ ages, medical circumstances and immediate causes of death, citing privacy concerns.

On Wednesday, Lancaster County Commissioner Josh Parsons said on X that the Lancaster County Coroner’s Office had recorded zero deaths caused by measles — only one death of a person who tested positive for measles.

The coroner, Dr. Stephen Diamantoni, told the Philadelphia Inquirer that one of the deaths involved a newborn who died shortly after birth from a lacerated spleen. Measles antibodies were present in postmortem testing, but Diamantoni said the death was not caused by measles.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a “measles-related death” as a death in someone with a positive measles test that occurs within 30 days of a measles rash onset “and is not due to other unrelated causes” such as trauma. The WHO standard raises questions about how the Pennsylvania health authorities classified the infant’s death.

DOH spokesperson Neil Ruhland told The Defender that the department classifies a death “measles-associated” if “laboratory or epidemiologic evidence of measles is present,” even when the medical certifier or coroner doesn’t find measles was the immediate cause.

Pennsylvania Secretary of Health Debra Bogen said on X both individuals “tested positive for measles” and that DOH is not required to report deaths to coroners. The department has not disclosed any information about the second death.

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Shapiro sparred over the announcement. Shapiro blamed Kennedy and the Trump administration for circulating vaccine “misinformation.” He declined help from the federal government with the ongoing measles outbreak.

After the conflicting claims from DOH officials and the coroner’s office made headlines, Kennedy said on X that Shapiro’s announcement of two measles deaths on Tuesday appeared premature and may have been “altogether fabricated” by one of his staffers hoping to score a political win.

Kennedy called Shapiro’s Tuesday press conference “a replay of the Democrats’ COVID playbook: fearmongering, misinformation, finger-pointing, and the weaponization of infectious disease fears for political gain.”

Pennsylvania has deep financial ties to vaccine industry

At the podium on Tuesday, Shapiro didn’t disclose his administration’s extensive financial relationships with vaccine manufacturers specifically, and the pharmaceutical industry broadly.

Investigative journalist Sayer Ji documented roughly $5.5 billion in public and private investment in commonwealth-backed pharmaceutical and life-sciences companies under Shapiro, including about $300 million in direct support from Pennsylvania.

That total includes a $10.65 million grant Shapiro personally announced to flu vaccine manufacturer Sanofi Pasteur on June 26 — 60 days before the Lancaster press conference — and $21 million in commonwealth support for a GSK vaccine-manufacturing expansion in Lancaster County itself.

The GSK expansion project is just minutes from where the press conference was held. Ji reported that the project is “the largest Commonwealth-supported economic development project in Lancaster County history.”

Additional commonwealth-backed investment has gone to Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen Biotech, Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories (also in Lancaster County), and Innovate in PA 2.0, a tax-credit program supporting startup capital and a statewide clinical trial network.

On Oct. 1, 2025, Shapiro signed an executive order stating that Pennsylvania “manufactures more than one-half of all vaccines administered in the United States.”

The order was intended to position the state to maintain its own vaccine guidance independent of federal recommendations, should the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention alter the childhood vaccine schedule.

DOH and governor work to expand health department powers

While the reports of measles deaths drew national attention, the Shapiro administration was separately advancing a proposed rewrite of the commonwealth’s communicable and non-communicable disease regulation.

The draft regulation was published Aug. 8, with public comment open through Sept. 21 — meaning the two unresolved measles deaths became national news 17 days after the regulation’s publication.

The proposed rule would significantly expand the DOH’s authority. The proposal includes expanding the list of reportable diseases from 52 to 125 and adding an open-ended “emerging disease” category.

It also calls for broadening immunization-reporting requirements and formalizing access to medical records, facilities and schools during investigations.

Provision 27.60 of the proposed regulation gives the DOH authority to order disease-control measures — like masking, social distancing and vaccine mandates — for disease “prevention, containment or mitigation.”

Researcher James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., noted in his Substack analysis that the preamble to the proposed rule specifically mentions a lawsuit that struck down school mask mandates.

Lyons-Weiler said the proposed rewrite appears specifically designed to give the state the legal authority that it lacked to implement such measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“In other words, the COVID-era legal defeat is not an incidental historical reference. It is part of the rationale for rewriting the rule,” he said.

‘Vaccines are on the ballot’

In a separate Substack post, Ji suggested that the political response to the Lancaster deaths didn’t emerge organically. He said that a well-resourced messaging apparatus was already positioned to convert the measles announcement into a national narrative.

Six days before Pennsylvania’s announcement, Protect Our Care — a Democratic Party health advocacy group staffed by former Democratic National Committee members, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services counselors and others — and 314 Action released results of polling designed to test vaccine-related messages for their power to damage Republicans electorally.

According to Ji, participants were presented with claims about measles returning, the Trump administration disregarding scientific evidence and Republicans weakening childhood vaccine recommendations.

The poll showed that 50%-54% of respondents said the messages lowered their opinion of GOP members of Congress.

Protect Our Care concluded that “vaccines are on the ballot” and that vaccine policy was the GOP’s greatest midterm weakness. In an Aug. 20 newsletter, the organization wrote: “needlessly putting kids in the hospital or morgue is a political loser.”

Ji reported that when Pennsylvania announced the deaths on Aug. 25, Protect Our Care immediately stated that Trump and Kennedy had fueled the crisis, “resulting in” the deaths. President Brad Woodhouse said, “Trump and RFK Jr. have blood on their hands … Mr. Kennedy, fucking resign already.”

Protect Our Care is not a charity; it is a lobbying group. Ji said that Shapiro’s office has worked closely with Protect Our Care since 2020, and noted the group’s own website describes its work as using a “campaign mentality” and running “tightly orchestrated, narrative-shaping initiatives.”

Ji was careful to frame this as raising questions rather than proving coordination. The timeline shows that the messaging infrastructure existed and was quickly activated, not that its timing or content were coordinated in advance with the state’s announcement, Ji said.

The information together — the coroner’s dispute over cause of death, the unmentioned funding to vaccine manufacturers, the regulation expanding the department’s own authority, and a political messaging operation that moved within hours — raises concerns about the deaths and Pennsylvania’s response.

Parsons continues to demand answers on X and to accuse the Pennsylvania health officials of “deception.”


This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

August 27, 2026 Posted by | Deception, Science and Pseudo-Science | , | Comments Off on Coroner Contradicts Pennsylvania Health Officials, Says Measles Didn’t Cause Newborn’s Death

Is Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s using measles scare to push Covid-era public health regulations?

By Jefferey Jaxen | August 27, 2026

On August 8, as measles cases climbed across Pennsylvania and schools prepared to reopen, Gov. Josh Shapiro’s Department of Health published a sweeping rewrite of the state’s communicable-disease rules.

17 days later national headlines now report of two measles-associated deaths whose status is current unresolved with several clear anomalies that has the public, politicians and Kennedy himself asking serious questions about their validity.

Regulation 10-242, filed with the Independent Regulatory Review Commission as IRRC No. 3490, runs hundreds of pages and would remake 28 Pa. Code Chapter 27 — the same chapter that governed isolation, reporting, and outbreak control long before Covid. Public comment closes September 21. Shapiro’s gubernatorial election vote happens on November 3 the stakes are high.

The political context is harder to ignore.

The rule update would erode parent consent in a child’s health care, create a mandatory vaccine tracking database, and give the Department of Health access to children’s medical records without parental consent.

Specifically regarding measles, the newly proposed rule would create a category called § 27.160 isolation plus outbreak quarantine of “presumed susceptibles.

The rule would pair isolation with outbreak quarantine of those presumed ‘susceptibles’ and keep them out of a setting until they prove they are not susceptible, take a measles vaccine, or no cases occur there for 21 days.

In an outbreak concentrated in communities with religious or philosophical exemptions, that is not a technical tweak. It is a lever.

The proposed rule would do far more than update a measles protocol. Under the draft, the department or a local health authority “may enter an apartment, building, health care facility, school, college or university, or other location” during an investigation if the official shows agency credentials. No warrant is required. People may not “interfere.” In schools, officials would get “reasonable and timely access” to students for contact tracing or partner services and could “meet and speak with a student or other person in private.” The text does not require parental notice, parental presence, or parental consent before that interview.

Reportable diseases, infections, and conditions would expand from about 52 to 125, including COVID-19 and an open-ended “emerging disease or condition”

House Republican Leader Jesse Topper called the package “oppressive COVID-era policies” and demanded it be withdrawn.

“Submitting these regulations seems to be devoid of any understanding of our recent history of dangerous government overreach…”

Shapiro’s office and the legacy media have treated the outbreak and, still unconfirmed, measles deaths as proof of leadership and treated Kennedy as the face of “anti-science.”

The regulation tells a different story. It is a bid to restore, by rule-making, authorization the failed pandemic response taught many Pennsylvanians to fear and reject. While a contested measles emergency still dominates the news the rule’s public comment file is open. The election is not far behind.

August 27, 2026 Posted by | Civil Liberties, Science and Pseudo-Science | , , | Comments Off on Is Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s using measles scare to push Covid-era public health regulations?

The Measles Message Was Ready Before the Deaths Were Announced

How an unresolved medical announcement became an election-year weapon before the evidence was public

By Sayer Ji | August 26, 2026

In Lancaster, PA, an unresolved medical announcement entered a political machinery that had already tested the fear, selected the target, and prepared the response.

On August 25, Pennsylvania announced that two unvaccinated Lancaster County residents had suffered “measles-associated deaths”—the first such deaths reported by the Commonwealth in 35 years.

By the end of the day, the announcement was no longer merely a public-health report. It had become an indictment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Donald Trump, and the Make America Healthy Again movement.

But the most revealing fact is not simply how quickly the deaths were politicized.

It is that the political message had already been built.

The Message Was Tested First

Six days before Pennsylvania announced the deaths, Protect Our Care and 314 Action released a national poll commissioned to determine which vaccine messages made voters view Republicans less favorably.

The poll did not merely measure public opinion about vaccination. It explicitly measured electoral damage.

Respondents were presented with claims about measles returning, the Trump administration disregarding scientific evidence, and Republicans weakening childhood vaccine recommendations. Between 50 and 54 percent said the messages made them view Republicans in Congress less favorably.

The organizations’ conclusion was unmistakable:

“Vaccines are on the ballot.”

Protect Our Care called vaccine policy the Republican Party’s “greatest existential and political liability in the midterms.”

The following day—five days before the Lancaster announcement—Protect Our Care published an even more revealing formulation:

“Needlessly putting kids in the hospital or morgue is a political loser.”

The emotional frame was already loaded: endangered children, preventable hospitalization, death, and Republican culpability.

Then came August 25.

Pennsylvania announced two “measles-associated deaths.” That same day, Protect Our Care declared that Trump and Kennedy had fueled the measles crisis “resulting in” those deaths and circulated a national package of headlines assigning political blame.

The event had arrived. The narrative was ready.

This Was Not a Public-Health Agency

Protect Our Care is not a government health authority or an independent medical organization.

It is a 501(c)(4) advocacy group that says it uses a “campaign mentality” to influence policy, support political “health care champions,” shape media narratives, and hold elected officials accountable. Its own website says it commissions polling and operates “tightly orchestrated, narrative-shaping initiatives” whose messages are distributed to lawmakers, the media, partners, and allies.

In December 2025, the organization expanded a project called Public Health Watch to oppose Trump and Kennedy “in real time.”

It staffed the project with veterans of national elections, progressive political campaigns, rapid response, and “war rooms.” Its stated methods included strategic messaging, storytelling, pressure campaigns, and constructing a “compelling narrative” for public officials, communicators, influencers, and the broader public.

That is not a conspiracy theory.

It is the organization’s own description of its operation.

Pennsylvania Had Built Its Own Communications Architecture

A parallel structure was already operating inside Pennsylvania.

In October 2025, Governor Josh Shapiro created a Vaccine Education Advisory Workgroup and directed state agencies to align vaccine communications, promote vaccine uptake, counter what the administration considered misinformation, and establish a centralized state vaccine portal.

At its first meeting in December, the workgroup discussed information “tailored to different demographics,” responses to “harmful, inaccurate, and misguided” vaccine claims, and engagement in areas with historically lower vaccination rates.

By April 2026, Pennsylvania said the group was guiding “tailored outreach to populations at higher risk for diseases like measles and hepatitis B.”

Whatever one thinks of the underlying policy, the architecture is clear:

  • identify resistant populations;
  • tailor the message by demographic;
  • centralize official communications;
  • counter disfavored narratives;
  • and increase behavioral uptake.

By the time Lancaster became the center of the measles story, the communications infrastructure was already in place.

What Remains Medically Unresolved

The political certainty surrounding the deaths has moved considerably faster than the public medical evidence.

Pennsylvania later clarified that it uses the term “measles-associated” when laboratory or epidemiological evidence of measles is present—even when measles is not assessed by the medical certifier or coroner as the immediate cause of death.

One of the deceased has been reported to be an infant whose death remains under review by the Lancaster County coroner. The coroner was not investigating the second death. A county commissioner said the coroner had reported no death certified as caused by measles and described the infant as having died with measles while apparently dying from another cause.

Pennsylvania has not publicly released:

  • the second person’s age;
  • the clinical course of either patient;
  • relevant underlying conditions;
  • the immediate or underlying causes of death;
  • the exact diagnostic basis used in each attribution;
  • or the laboratory and sequencing data.

Genotyping is not required under CDC criteria to confirm a measles case; PCR, serology, viral isolation, or direct epidemiological linkage may qualify. But the state has not disclosed which evidence supported either death classification.

The public therefore cannot presently determine the precise causal role measles played in either death.

Yet the political narrative had already advanced from:

“measles-associated”

to:

“died of measles”

to:

“Trump and Kennedy caused their deaths.”

Political attribution outran medical disclosure.

What the Documents Establish

The public record now establishes that:

  • a political advocacy organization built a rapid-response “war room” against Trump and Kennedy;
  • vaccine messages were tested specifically for their power to damage Republicans;
  • “hospital or morgue” imagery was deployed before the deaths were announced;
  • Pennsylvania had established a demographic-targeting vaccine communications apparatus;
  • and the Lancaster announcement was immediately incorporated into a preexisting midterm narrative.

That is an overt influence operation in the ordinary meaning of the term: an organized effort to shape public perception and behavior toward a political outcome. Sadly, it is not a novel phenomenon. I’ve documented influence operations targeting Secretary Kennedy and the MAHA grassroots movement previously on this Substack:

The remaining question is whether the actors merely converged on the same opportunity—or coordinated its timing, framing, and amplification.

The answer requires records, not rhetoric: the complete cause-of-death findings, diagnostic documentation, the timeline on which the August 25 event and talking points were prepared, and communications among the Governor’s Office, Pennsylvania Department of Health, political organizations, and outside advocacy groups.

Lancaster deserves public health.

It also deserves public proof.

Because when a government announcement is converted into electoral blame before the underlying evidence is released, transparency is no longer optional. It is the only meaningful defense against propaganda scripted ahead of certainty.

To follow this real-time unfolding story, see my reporting on X.

August 27, 2026 Posted by | Deception, Science and Pseudo-Science | | Comments Off on The Measles Message Was Ready Before the Deaths Were Announced

What TURMERIC Really Does to Your BODY: 5 INCREDIBLE Studies

Dr. Suneel Dhand | August 21, 2026

This ancient spice used in eastern culture for thousands of years…

Ojais Inflammation Immune Support: https://www.ojaiswellness.com/product…

Ojais Wellness Natural Health Store (USA/North America): https://www.ojaiswellness.com

Ojais Wellness Natural Health Store (UK/Europe): https://www.ojaiswellness.co

Dr Dhand’s 30-Day Blood Pressure Reset: https://thebpreset.com

Dr. Dhand’s website: https://www.drsuneeldhand.com

21-Day Metabolic Health Reset Free Download: https://www.ojaiswellness.com/pages/m…

Dr Dhand Free Newsletter Sign-Up: https://drsuneeldhand.com/free-newsle…

August 27, 2026 Posted by | Science and Pseudo-Science, Timeless or most popular, Video | Comments Off on What TURMERIC Really Does to Your BODY: 5 INCREDIBLE Studies

The cult of Fauci cult shows no signs of cooling down

By Bruna Frascolla | Strategic Culture Foundation | August 26, 2026

There is a vast difference between believing in witches and embarking on a witch hunt. While belief in witches likely prevailed throughout most of human history, mass hysteria driving a hunt for them is rare. The case of wokeness points to a similar dynamic: since the 1960s, U.S. institutions have propagated a conspiratorial sociology and a Manichaean anthropology worldwide, positing that Christendom, across all eras, has been inherently hostile toward women, blacks and gays. Yet, it was only in the 2010s, spurred by social media, that a significant segment of society began looking for racists under the bed and denouncing them everywhere. The onset of this hysteria coincided with the Euromaidan protests (2014), and represented the U.S. as a beacon of freedom standing against oppression. Moscow, the traditional villain, ceased to be viewed as communist and came to be seen as homophobic.

Recently, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tried to suggest that the “woke” phenomenon was merely a pandemic-induced delusion. While that isn’t strictly true, the lie gains traction because people were indeed not their usual selves during the pandemic, and wokeness was in full swing. I would venture to identify the George Floyd protests—which emerged in the U.S. in 2020 and were almost instantly replicated across Western Europe—as the peak of this pandemic-era delirium. There was even an attempt to stage a Brazilian version in São Paulo, led by soccer fan groups claiming to fight for democracy (this was during the Bolsonaro administration, which the most radical woke adherents viewed as a dictatorship). I single this out as the height of the madness because the press had spent the preceding months practically branding anyone who dared step outside a murderer, yet suddenly, taking to the streets to form a mob and topple “racist” statues was treated almost as a civic duty. Schools and churches were shut down because they caused “crowding,” yet gathering in crowds to vandalize the city was given the green light. Woke pedagogy and religion were the only forms of expression permitted in the public square.

The George Floyd protests also help clarify one thing: during the pandemic, traditional media acted as the catalyst for mass hysteria. While mainstream media certainly embraced wokeness, it is widely acknowledged that the driving force behind this hysteria was social media—specifically Facebook and Twitter. Traditional media generally followed suit rather than taking the lead: TV networks would have anchors spout politically correct platitudes while discussing the news or feature black women or Asian gays in prominent roles, but they were not the ones instigating cancel culture campaigns. As far as I recall, it was only during the pandemic that traditional media began actively inciting “woke” demonstrations, thereby assuming a position of genuine leadership. The Black Lives Matter organization lacked CNN’s mobilizing power; in Brazil, the Corinthians fan base lacked Globo’s reach.

The segments of the population led by traditional media differ from those led by social media influencers. The former group is much larger, considerably older, and far less politicized. Yet, during the pandemic, the two groups converged, moving in the same direction.

The discovery of Fauci’s diary compels us to revisit that period in history. Fauci kept an online diary on a government server, where he recorded his impressions of press coverage, his personal feelings, and so on. No hacking was required to uncover this information; one simply had to consult U.S. government servers, where Fauci’s emails and messages were also stored. Currently, there is a U.S. Senate investigation into this individual’s conduct during the pandemic, and this inquiry has uncovered matters of the utmost gravity. For instance, Fauci was privately warned that the experimental COVID “vaccines” could cause miscarriages, yet publicly he insisted they posed no risk and should be taken by pregnant women. As someone who is not a doctor, I take pride in having spoken out in 2021 against the propaganda made by YouTube for pregnant women, which offered them unrealistic assurances of safety. Time has proven me right, yet any expectation of a mea culpa is in vain.

One of the few topics from the Senate committee investigations that the mainstream media has touched upon is the laboratory origin of the coronavirus. So-called “conspiracy theorists” had long known that Fauci funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan; however, only now—with the release of correspondence revealing Fauci’s efforts to enforce the “bat soup” narrative—has the mainstream media begun to feign surprise at the subject. The U.S. creating biological weapons in overseas labs? Never! That would be conspiracy theory territory; instead, call it “gain-of-function research”, where selfless scientists simply play the role of nature by creating new, lethal viruses, all to discover a vaccine in advance, for the good of humanity.

When I was a child, there was enough medical information available to know that the flu vaccine was always lagging behind, because the flu virus is constantly mutating—yet now I am expected to believe that gain-of-function research offers a realistic prospect of anticipating the wildest viruses nature would have cooked up anyway. God forbid we believe Russia’s allegations regarding biolabs in Ukraine! Or rather, God forbid we even become aware of them!

Ever since the emergence of these hastily developed, mandatory vaccines, it became clear to me that there was a geopolitical divide far more significant than the one between Right and Left. In Brazil, for instance, skepticism became associated with the Bolsonarist Right, whereas the Left embraced the Democrats’ narrative en masse. Yet, I observed that Cuba and Venezuela were using chloroquine. Where Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines are present, U.S. influence prevails; where such vaccines are absent—and where seeking off-label treatments is not taboo—U.S. influence does not prevail.

Commenting on the latest news regarding Fauci, a rare article published by Opera Mundi (one of the few Brazilian leftist outlets sympathetic to Chavismo) stated: “The controversy surrounding biolabs became one of the most intense political debates in the U.S. during the pandemic. The ‘bat theory’ was automatically linked to Democratic progressivism, while any mention of biolabs was dismissed as yet another piece of Trumpist fake news. Since then, the goal has no longer been to uncover the truth, but to stake out a position against the opposing camp. In Brazil, this importation of ‘ideas out of place’ was even more clumsy than Roberto Schwarz could have imagined. We didn’t even copy the new phase of the controversy; we preferred to pretend nothing happened.”

This is the state of affairs in Brazil: if it didn’t air on Jornal Nacional, it didn’t happen; it’s all just fake news from crude right-wingers. A state investigation by the world’s greatest power, conducted by representatives of the people—that simply didn’t happen. As a large, monolingual country that does not, in practice, require its middle class to know English, Brazil is susceptible to this dynamic.

Take, for instance, the day I tried to show a doctor that I was right and she was wrong regarding COVID vaccines. I was astonished to find her literally offended because I shared news reports that contradicted her beliefs; she invoked the argument of freedom of conscience—typical of religious warfare—when, in reality, the issue involved simple factual matters that should be verifiable by atheists and believers of all stripes alike. A lack of broader knowledge made any English-language website suspect—even the New York Post, founded by Alexander Hamilton. The doctor in question, as is common among her social class, opposes to Lula’s Party. The non-Bolsonarist Brazilian right is also staunchly pro-COVID vaccine (see the stances of former Governor Ronaldo Caiado and movement leader Renan Santos, both of whom run for presidency). This is a right-wing faction that adores the U.S., loathes Trump, and finds itself uncomfortable with shifting geopolitical realities.

If there is one thing that unites adherents of this right-wing faction with the left in general—especially the “woke” left—it is the conviction that they are more enlightened than the average person, standing on a plane far above the common rabble. In a sense, Trumpism in the U.S. and Bolsonarism in Brazil serve to create a straw man—the uncultured, utter ignoramus—against whom the conformist citizen, devoid of any particular virtue, can feel special simply by comparison. It is an ego crutch. I am not sure if this maps perfectly onto the New Right parties in Europe; given the vigorous prevalence of wokeness in the European Union, a conformist citizen need only label someone a fascist or a racist to feel superior to many of their fellow countrymen.

The years of pandemic mass hysteria have crystallized into a cult of Fauci followers whose self-worth hinges on their beliefs regarding the pandemic. These are people who believe that only what appears in the mainstream media is true; who think that without the arrival of the “vaccines,” COVID would still be highly lethal today (surely the Brazilian Indians invented the flu vaccine in the 16th century, thereby avoiding extinction); who believe that when they are afraid, it is right and necessary to sacrifice the lives of healthy young people, who notoriously would not have died from COVID, for the sake of their own emotional comfort (from the start of the pandemic, it was widely known that the elderly and the obese were the most vulnerable—yet, before the Ozempic fad, telling someone to lose weight was “fatphobia”). And later, once they have blood on their hands, having engaged in or legitimized a witch hunt against the unvaccinated and skeptics in general, they deem it right and necessary to uphold the lie so they can maintain that emotional comfort.

It is difficult to envision a solution for these people. Just as crack addicts will use every last cent to numb themselves, these conformists with inflated egos will use any pretext to cling to their own beliefs. This situation is all the more serious given the medical community’s widespread adherence to this creed. It means that many of our so-called doctors are nothing more than pharmaceutical propagandists, lacking the competence and critical judgment to act in accordance with the Hippocratic Oath.

August 26, 2026 Posted by | Progressive Hypocrite, Science and Pseudo-Science | , , , | Comments Off on The cult of Fauci cult shows no signs of cooling down

Former CDC Scientist Whose Studies Were Used to ‘Debunk’ Vaccine-Autism Link Will Plead Guilty

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. | The Defender | August 24, 2026

A former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist who played a crucial role in research rebutting any link between vaccines and autism is expected to plead guilty next week to wire fraud and money laundering.

Poul Thorsen, 65, is finalizing a plea deal with prosecutors relating to charges stemming from a 2011 federal indictment, Nathan Kitchens, assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, told The Defender.

Thorsen, who began working for the CDC in the late 1990s, faces two counts of wire fraud and nine counts of money laundering related to over $1 million in CDC grant money. The funds were earmarked for autism and public health research, but Thorsen allegedly used them to buy a home, two cars and a motorcycle.

Kitchens declined to comment on whether Thorsen will plead guilty to all or some of the charges.

Thorsen has been held in federal custody without bail since his extradition from Germany to the U.S. in May. The case is being heard at a federal court in Georgia, where the CDC is headquartered.

Researcher James Grundvig, the parent of a child with autism who was vaccine-injured, called the expected guilty plea “a very big deal.”

Grundvig, who wrote “Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC,” which focused on the Thorsen case, praised U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for extraditing Thorsen “in record speed.”

He said Thorsen likely understands that the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice have “all the goods” to prosecute him.

“I guess Thorsen’s realizing, since he’s in American jail already and has no chance for bail, he might as well make a plea deal,” Grundvig said.

Dr. Dave Weldon, a physician and Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives between 1994 and 2009 — and who President Donald Trump nominated to lead the CDC in late 2024 before retracting his nomination in March 2025 — welcomed the plea agreement but said it isn’t enough.

“It would be a miscarriage of justice if a plea deal failed to include a thorough investigation of allegations of scientific fraud,” Weldon said.

Danish independent vaccine safety researcher Vibeke Manniche, M.D., Ph.D., said some of the federal funds Thorsen is said to have misused may have been intended for vaccine-autism studies. Manniche said the guilty plea calls Thorsen’s research into question.

“An obvious question is whether he also has been cheating with data to achieve the results he sought,” Manniche said. “That we don’t know. A good rule in gold-standard science is replication, and it would be wise, for so many reasons, to replicate his work,” independently of the institutions Thorsen had been affiliated with.

Grundvig noted that the Thorsen indictment included unnamed co-conspirators, suggesting that the investigation may implicate more people — and also the controversial autism research that Thorsen helped publish in 2002 and 2003 that was cited as proof of no link between vaccines and autism.

“I think that’s going to be the second part of the story,” Grundvig said. “It could be an avalanche of bad news for both pharma and the CDC.”

Thorsen studies cited in dismissing over 5,000 vaccine injury claims

Despite questions around how those studies were conducted, the Madsen-Thorsen papers were used in 2011 to dismiss over 5,000 claims filed by the parents of autistic, vaccine-injured children. The claims were part of the Omnibus Autism Proceeding pending before the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

In “Master Manipulator,” Grundvig — whose son’s case was one of the claims dismissed as a result of Thorsen’s research — described Thorsen as “a world-class villain whose manipulation of health data gave CDC and big pharma what they wanted: a report clearing thimerosal of any possible role in the autism crisis.”

According to Weldon:

“The real crime is not absconding with research dollars, but unresolved allegations around his research which served as the basis for the CDC and the U.S. government dismissing vaccine injury claims by thousands of injured children. These actions set back vaccine safety research by more than two decades.”

Grundvig suggested the Thorsen investigation and his guilty plea may call into question the dismissal of the omnibus cases, as it would “then make all of those vaccine omnibus proceedings completely fraudulent because it was based on a fraud, and that should reopen the cases.”

Hooker, whose omnibus claim for his son was also dismissed, said Thorsen likely didn’t act alone in misusing federal money or misrepresenting vaccine-autism research — and that the role of some of his key collaborators should be examined.

“There should be a separate investigation against Dr. Diana Schendel, who was Thorsen’s direct grant supervisor and lover and approved all of his invoices for expenditures from his CDC grant money. Dr. Schendel undoubtedly knew of Thorsen’s activities but did not report them to the authorities and could have spent some of the stolen grant money as well,” Hooker said.

Schendel maintained an inappropriate romantic relationship with Thorsen and later accepted a position at Denmark’s Aarhus University to lead autism research there. She remains employed at Aarhus University — and at Drexel University — today.

Thorsen continued to live in Denmark for years after the 2011 U.S. indictment. He worked there as a gynecologist despite an extradition treaty between the two countries and an INTERPOL warrant for his arrest.

Hooker added:

“Other co-conspirators who knew of the inappropriate relationship between Thorsen and Schendel over the seven-year grant history at CDC include Coleen Boyle, Ph.D., former director of the National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities), and Dr. Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsop, former branch chief of the Developmental Disabilities Branch at the CDC.

“These individuals at a minimum should be brought in for questioning. Both have also been implicated in the MMR-autism fraud from the DeStefano et al. 2004 paper, where data showing a strong relationship between MMR timing and autism in Black boys was illegally destroyed.”

Thorsen’s vaccine-autism studies full of ‘irregularities’

When he first joined the CDC as a visiting scientist, Thorsen’s research focused on birth defects and developmental disabilities.

However, by the early 2000s, Thorsen shifted his focus to autism research. His work in this area left a strong imprint, fueling future narratives that autism isn’t linked to vaccines.

According to a 2017 report by the World Mercury Project — predecessor to Children’s Health Defense (CHD) — Thorsen’s influence on U.S. vaccine projects and policies “is extensive” because his studies were used to dismiss a possible link between vaccines and autism.

One of the most influential studies became known as the “Madsen study,” a population-based study of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism.

Published in 2002 in The New England Journal of Medicine and co-authored by Thorsen, the Madsen study concluded that there is “strong evidence against the hypothesis that MMR vaccination causes autism.”

However, according to the 2017 World Mercury Project report, the Madsen study was “flawed” from the outset because the researchers reviewed clinical records of only 40 of the 316 children who had autism in the study’s cohort.

A peer-reviewed analysis published last year cast further doubt on the study’s conclusions.

In 2003, Madsen and Thorsen co-authored another influential study, published in Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The study did “not support a correlation between thimerosal-containing vaccines and the incidence of autism.”

Thimerosal is a mercury-based adjuvant used in some vaccines, which some scientists and advocates for people with autism have suggested may trigger autism.

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., CHD’s chief scientific officer, said there are “numerous data irregularities” in the Thorsen studies.

In their critique of the 2002 paper, Hooker and Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., CHD senior research scientist, found significant errors in the paper. They concluded the study’s unadjusted results “do not support rejecting the causal link” between the MMR vaccine and autism.

In a critique of the 2003 Madsen-Thorsen study, Hooker and researcher Jeffrey Allen Trelka concluded that the study’s findings “may have been skewed by participant selection and changes in diagnostic groupings.”

Other critiques of the 2002 and 2003 studies raised concerns about ethical considerations. Both studies relied on Danish population data. According to the 2017 World Mercury Project report, the studies bypassed ethical reviews required for this category of research, as required by federal law.

When the CDC discovered Thorsen hadn’t obtained the required ethics approvals, the agency didn’t report the errors, and the studies weren’t retracted. Instead, CDC officials engaged in a cover-up, the 2017 report states.

“Given these irregularities, Thorsen should also be under investigation for data fraud as he clearly withheld data and could have altered data” from Danish official sources, Hooker told The Defender.

Manniche said that if it is proven Thorsen tampered with the data in his studies, it would be a “terrible tragedy,” because “parents were told that the MMR vaccine was safe and sound and that it couldn’t harm the child.”

As of July 31, there were 1,931 reports claiming onset of autism or autism spectrum disorder following MMR vaccination contained within the federally run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Will Thorsen sing?

Grundvig suggested that, as part of his plea agreement with prosecutors, Thorsen may have an incentive to provide testimony or information targeting other CDC figures.

“Thorsen’s 65 years old, born in 1961 … does he want to die in an American jail?” Grundvig asked. “I don’t think so. So, I think he wants to make, and will make, a plea deal. The only way he’s going to make a plea deal is with someone like Kennedy and maybe others in the Department of Justice that look at a bigger case,” Grundvig said.

Grundvig suggested this “bigger case” may involve the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act or RICO Act.

“There’s a bigger fraud involved than just stealing money, and I think it goes back to the vaccines, it goes back to the studies that the CDC cooked up,” potentially implicating Schendel and Madsen.

“Will he be used as a star witness against the CDC old guard and all of the shenanigans that went on massaging of science, of science papers, influence on Pediatrics and other journals, in order to get all of this done back in the early 2000s in order to exonerate vaccines and erase the autism signal?” Grundvig asked.


This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

August 25, 2026 Posted by | Corruption, Deception, Science and Pseudo-Science | | Comments Off on Former CDC Scientist Whose Studies Were Used to ‘Debunk’ Vaccine-Autism Link Will Plead Guilty

CA ATTACKS JOURNALISM, THE CLANCY CONTROVERSY & MRNA’s CANCER CURE?

The Download | August 24, 2026

This week on The Download, California’s latest attempt to police journalism raises new questions about who gets to define misinformation. As the Lindsay Clancy trial reaches its final arguments, Jefferey asks whether another powerful player is escaping scrutiny. Then, an undercover investigation reveals how quickly a complaint about ADHD can open the door to a staggering menu of psychiatric drugs.

Plus, Moderna’s new mRNA cancer-vaccine “breakthrough” faces questions beyond the glowing headlines, ‘Face the Nation’ moderator Margaret Brennan’s COVID-mandate narrative collides with her own record, and Jefferey issues a major call to action as Secretary Kennedy seeks public input on federal vaccine recommendations.

August 25, 2026 Posted by | Full Spectrum Dominance, Science and Pseudo-Science, Video | | Comments Off on CA ATTACKS JOURNALISM, THE CLANCY CONTROVERSY & MRNA’s CANCER CURE?

The 12 Symptoms Your Body Uses to Save Your Life

An Essay on Suppression, Cascade, and the Pharmaceutical Business Model

Lies are Unbekoming | August 16, 2026

“Doctors should be treated with about the same trust as used car salesmen.”

Robert S. Mendelsohn, MD


Author’s Note: When examining the mainstream framework, I use its vocabulary because the argument requires meeting the establishment on its own ground. In my own voice, the twelve events treated here are not manifestations of disease. They are the body’s intelligent responses to insult, whether toxic exposure, nutritional depletion, electromagnetic burden, or sustained stress. The response is the healing. Suppression of the response is the pathology.


The Pharmacy Shelf

Herbert Shelton, in 1964, identified suppression of the body’s elimination and self-defense as “the most frequent cause of death.”¹

Every over-the-counter shelf in every pharmacy on earth is a monument to the position that sentence opposes.

Tylenol lowers the fever, Advil the swelling, Robitussin the cough, Imodium the diarrhea, Zofran the vomiting, hydrocortisone the rash, Sudafed the mucus, Adderall the fatigue, Marinol the missing appetite, Lasix the retained fluid, oxycodone the pain, paroxetine the night sweats. Every one of them works, meaning every one of them successfully stops what the body is trying to do.

The Family Medicine Cabinet Audit (2026)

The premise underneath the entire product category is identical: the symptom is the disease, and suppression is the treatment. If the premise is correct, modern pharmacy is a triumph of applied science. If the premise is wrong, modern pharmacy is the most extensive iatrogenic disaster in human history, systematically interrupting the body’s repair processes and converting acute events into chronic conditions.

The premise is wrong.

The Framework

The body does not make mistakes. When damaged by toxic exposure, nutritional depletion, electromagnetic exposure, or sustained stress, it initiates an intelligent response designed to restore homeostasis. Vomiting expels stomach contents. Diarrhea flushes the intestine. Fatigue reallocates energy from muscular activity to internal repair. Appetite loss frees the digestive system so its resources can be redirected. Every mechanism is designed to protect the organism, and every one produces symptoms.

Shelton articulated the acute-to-chronic sequence with characteristic directness. An insult damages tissue. The body responds with elimination or repair, producing symptoms. Those symptoms are suppressed with drugs, which add their own toxic burden to what was already present. New symptoms emerge in response and are suppressed in turn. Over time the cumulative burden exceeds the body’s capacity to eliminate. What was acute becomes chronic, then progressive, and the patient is placed on lifelong medication.²

Constantine Hering, working in the nineteenth century, documented the directional signature of the process. Genuine healing proceeds from interior to exterior, from above downward, from more critical organs to less critical. Suppression runs the pattern in reverse: from surface to interior, from mild to serious, from less critical structures to more critical ones. Each round of suppression drives the underlying disorder to a deeper location, where it re-expresses itself as what medicine reads as a new and unrelated condition.³

The mechanism is not theoretical. It operates with clinical predictability across the twelve categories catalogued below. Each is the body doing exactly what it should do. Each has an industry organized around stopping it.


1. Fever

When Matthew Kluger placed lizards with acute febrile illness on a temperature gradient in the 1970s, the sick lizards crawled to the warm end and stayed there. Their body temperature rose. When Kluger prevented them from reaching the warm end, or administered fever-suppressing drugs, they died at higher rates than the lizards allowed to run their fever.⁴ The finding has held across decades and species. Fever is not the disease; it is the response.

Robert Mendelsohn, a pediatrician who spent decades warning parents about the excesses of his own profession, documented what the mainstream pediatric literature has recorded. Fevers arising from ordinary illness do not exceed 106°F, because the body maintains internal mechanisms that prevent dangerous elevation.⁵ The febrile convulsions that terrify parents are triggered by the rate at which the temperature rises, not by the peak it reaches. By the time the parent notices the child is hot enough to be concerned, the rapid rise has already occurred and the seizure risk has passed. Mendelsohn attributed the prescription of fever reducers in this context to a specific motive: reassuring the parent that the doctor has intervened, at the cost of interrupting what the fever was accomplishing.

The mechanism is metabolic. Elevated temperature enhances enzymatic reactions, mobilizes stored waste, and drives the body’s effort to expel accumulated toxic material. Thomas Cowan attributes therapeutic power to heat itself: anything one can do to heat the cellular gel and allow it to cleanse itself through fever moves the body toward healing.⁶ William Coley documented tumor regression in cancer patients who developed acute febrile illness, and later provoked fever with bacterial toxins to reproduce the effect.⁷ The Natural Hygiene tradition summarized it plainly: fever is Nature’s bonfire.⁸

The pharmaceutical response is antipyretic. Acetaminophen (Tylenol, paracetamol) is the most widely used drug on earth. Its mechanism of action was not fully understood for over a century, and it operates in part by depleting cellular glutathione, the master antioxidant the body uses for detoxification. That depletion is the mechanism by which acetaminophen produces acute liver failure. It is now the leading cause of acute liver failure in the United States and the United Kingdom.⁹

Aspirin lowers fever by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis. When given to children during acute febrile illness, it triggers Reye’s syndrome, a condition affecting the brain and liver with a fatality rate historically approaching thirty percent. Approximately ninety percent of pediatric Reye’s cases were associated with aspirin use before the practice was formally discontinued.¹⁰ Aspirin was never withdrawn from the market; the recommendation for pediatric use was revised while the drug remained available for adults.

Ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) operates by the same prostaglandin-blocking mechanism, with documented harms including gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney damage, and elevated cardiovascular risk.¹¹

The cost of the suppression is not the drug’s toxicity alone. When the fever is chemically abolished, the body’s clearing effort is chemically abolished with it. Metabolic acceleration, waste mobilization, and the elevated temperature assisting cellular repair all shut down together. The patient feels better. The insult that provoked the fever remains, unaddressed, waiting.

What Is a Fever?

2. Inflammation

Inflammation is a hydraulic event. Herbert Shelton reduced it to mechanical reality: an increase in blood supply to a circumscribed area of the body, producing the four classical signs of heat, redness, swelling, and pain.¹² The purpose is delivery. Blood carries repair materials to damaged tissue. When the damage is repaired, the volume normalizes and inflammation resolves.

Cowan offered a metaphor that carries the mechanism cleanly. Inflammation is demolition. Before the body can build new tissue at a damaged site, it must clear the damaged material. Inflammatory mediators dissolve what shouldn’t be there. The redness, swelling, heat, and pain are the demolition in progress. Suppress the demolition and no rebuilding follows.¹³

The pharmaceutical response is the largest single drug category in medicine. NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, aspirin, diclofenac, celecoxib) constitute a market valued at over twenty-two billion dollars annually.¹⁴ Corticosteroids (prednisone, dexamethasone, hydrocortisone) suppress inflammation systemically at the cost of muscle wasting, bone thinning, elevated blood glucose, and adrenal dependence. Biologics prescribed for conditions labeled autoimmune, including Humira (adalimumab), Enbrel (etanercept), and Remicade (infliximab), generated $238 billion in lifetime revenue for Humira alone before biosimilar competition began eroding its dominance.¹⁵

Vioxx (rofecoxib) is the case study that ought to have ended the industry. Between 1999 and 2004, the COX-2 inhibitor produced an estimated 88,000 to 139,000 heart attacks in the United States, with a fatality rate between thirty and forty percent. FDA scientist David Graham, testifying to the Senate Finance Committee, called it “a disaster unparalleled” in American history.¹⁶ Vioxx, an anti-inflammatory drug prescribed to suppress the body’s repair response in arthritic joints, killed tens of thousands.

Every drug in the anti-inflammatory class carries documented harm. Methotrexate is a chemotherapy agent repurposed as maintenance for rheumatoid arthritis; azathioprine was developed to suppress organ rejection after transplantation; TNF-alpha inhibitors carry FDA-mandated black-box warnings for lymphoma, serious infections, and heart failure. The cascade of drug additions that follows (a hepatoprotectant to counter methotrexate, a bisphosphonate to counter corticosteroid bone loss, a proton pump inhibitor to counter NSAID stomach damage) is the mechanism by which a single inflammatory condition becomes a multi-drug, multi-organ, chronic patient profile.

What Is Inflammation?

3. Mucus

Mucus is a transport medium. The respiratory tract lines itself with mucus continuously and increases production when irritants must be captured and expelled. Daniel Roytas, reviewing the mainstream respiratory literature, documented what occurs during cold and flu-like illness. Mucus membranes release inflammatory chemicals including histamine and bradykinin. Both chemicals produce the classic cold symptoms of nasal congestion, sneezing, sore throat, and cough when inoculated experimentally into the airways of healthy individuals.¹⁷

The purpose is elimination. Roytas: sick people experience fevers and sweat profusely to excrete waste through the skin, and the respiratory mucus response operates on the same principle.¹⁸ Historical use of snus, powdered tobacco taken nasally to induce sneezing and mucus flow, was a deliberate application of the principle. The mucus is the mechanism by which the airways stay clear.

D.C. Jarvis, the Vermont country doctor who documented four decades of observing farmers and their animals, recorded the mechanism in dairy cows. Cows presenting with wet eyes, wet noses, and excess mucus stopped producing it when their potassium was corrected by adding apple cider vinegar to their feed. The eye, nose, and cough manifestations were the body’s spontaneous effort to shed excess water, and supplying the needed potassium through the ration corrected the underlying imbalance that had produced the load.¹⁹ The mucus was doing its job. What needed correction was what had provoked it.

The pharmaceutical response is antihistamines and decongestants. First-generation antihistamines including diphenhydramine (Benadryl) block histamine at H1 receptors and cross the blood-brain barrier, producing sedation. A 2015 University of Washington study led by Shelly Gray found that cumulative anticholinergic burden, of which first-generation antihistamines are a major source, correlated with elevated incidence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.²⁰ Second-generation antihistamines including loratadine (Claritin), cetirizine (Zyrtec), and fexofenadine (Allegra) reduce sedation but retain the underlying suppressive mechanism.

Decongestants operate by vasoconstriction. Pseudoephedrine (Sudafed) constricts the swollen nasal blood vessels, providing symptomatic relief while raising blood pressure systemically. Phenylephrine, marketed as the safer alternative after pseudoephedrine restrictions, was determined by an FDA advisory committee in September 2023 to be ineffective at labeled oral doses. Billions of doses were sold for decades with no measurable decongestant effect.²¹

The cost of the suppression is retention. Mucus that was carrying irritants out of the respiratory tract is chemically prevented from doing so. Shelton’s mechanism: the acute catarrhal response, repeatedly suppressed, becomes chronic catarrh, then ulceration, then the conditions labeled allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, and hay fever.²

4. Diarrhea

Diarrhea is emergency elimination through the intestine. Shelton stated it with characteristic economy. A poison is taken into the stomach, the organism senses the presence of a non-usable and harmful substance, and it acts. The material is sent out by vomiting, or sent along the digestive tract into the colon and expelled by violent diarrhea.²² The intestinal wall pours fluid into the lumen, peristalsis accelerates, and toxic material is flushed out before it can be absorbed.

The response is not restricted to ingested food-borne toxins. Chemical residues from pharmaceuticals, pesticide contamination, heavy-metal exposure, and toxins in contaminated water all provoke acute diarrhea as protective response. The WHO attributes diarrheal conditions to germs infecting via the fecal-oral route. Lester’s response is direct: diarrhea is a symptom not a disease, and it is the body’s reaction to toxic substances such as fecally contaminated water, representing its efforts to expel them.²³

The pharmaceutical response is loperamide (Imodium), diphenoxylate (Lomotil), and bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol). Loperamide acts on opioid receptors in the intestinal wall, slowing peristalsis and reducing fluid secretion into the lumen. The material the body was attempting to expel is retained and absorbed. Loperamide overdose, particularly among individuals seeking opioid effects, has caused sudden cardiac death through QT prolongation, prompting FDA warnings in 2016 and dosage restrictions in 2018.²⁴ Diphenoxylate operates by the same opioid slowing; bismuth subsalicylate shares aspirin’s salicylate mechanism and toxicity.

The cost of the suppression is absorption of what the body determined must not be absorbed. Whatever toxin, chemical, or waste material provoked the diarrhea remains in the intestinal tract, in contact with the absorptive surface, for the additional hours or days the drug retains it there. The bowel movement stops. The exposure continues.

5. Vomiting

Vomiting is emergency elimination through the stomach. The reflex is centrally coordinated, involving the brainstem, autonomic nervous system, and the diaphragm and abdominal musculature. It is not a malfunction; it is one of the body’s most rapid and effective defensive mechanisms.

Signals that trigger vomiting include ingested toxins, pharmaceutical residues, motion perception mismatches, elevated intracranial pressure, and metabolic disturbance. Morning sickness during pregnancy may represent protective response to substances the developing fetus would be sensitive to, a hypothesis with empirical support from the epidemiology of pregnancy outcomes.

The pharmaceutical response is antiemetic. Ondansetron (Zofran) blocks serotonin 5-HT3 receptors in the gut and central nervous system. Its use in pregnancy for morning sickness was widespread despite the drug’s FDA-listed cardiac risks, including QT interval prolongation and Torsades de Pointes. Ondansetron has been associated with congenital cardiac malformations in exposed pregnancies in multiple observational studies, though the manufacturer’s position and regulatory classification have varied.²⁵

Promethazine (Phenergan), a first-generation antihistamine prescribed for nausea, carries a black-box warning against use in children under two for respiratory depression and can cause tissue necrosis when given intravenously.²⁶

Metoclopramide (Reglan) increases intestinal motility centrally, forcing material downward against the body’s decision to expel it upward. Long-term use produces tardive dyskinesia, an irreversible movement disorder, resulting in a black-box warning and successful class-action litigation.²⁷

The cost of the suppression is retention of the material the body identified as unacceptable. What was to be expelled is forced to remain, and the signal that initiated the vomiting is still active in the body.

6. Skin Eruptions

The skin is an elimination organ. Henry Bieler articulated the principle: when bile poisons in the blood come out through the skin, various skin irritations follow.²⁸ When primary elimination routes such as liver, kidneys, and bowel are overloaded, the body attempts elimination through secondary routes. Toxins deposit in tissues, and the body mounts an inflammatory response to dissolve the deposits and push them outward, producing the rashes, hives, boils, and pustules visible at the surface.

Childhood eruptive illnesses labeled measles, chickenpox, and rubella were understood in the Natural Hygiene tradition as elimination events. John Tilden: measles is the manner in which a child’s body throws off toxemia.²⁹ The rash was diagnostic evidence that the elimination was proceeding correctly through the skin. Traditional practice was to keep the child warm, hydrated, and rested until the elimination completed.

Contact dermatitis, eczema, and acne have documented associations with specific toxic exposures. NIOSH recognizes dermal exposure to hazardous agents as a cause of both localized skin disease and systemic toxicity;³⁰ WHO documentation confirms that industrial solvents applied to skin become systemically available in considerable amounts.³¹ The personal care products, textiles, and household cleaners a person contacts daily are the vector.

The pharmaceutical response is topical and systemic corticosteroids. Hydrocortisone, the mildest, is available over the counter. Prescription strengths ascend through triamcinolone, betamethasone, and clobetasol. All operate by suppressing the inflammatory response, stopping the elimination event visible at the skin surface. Documented harms include skin thinning (atrophy), telangiectasia (visible capillaries), striae (stretch marks), and adrenal suppression from systemic absorption.

Topical steroid withdrawal syndrome is the mechanism through which chronic use produces dependence. When the drug is stopped, the suppressed elimination event returns with greater intensity. The accumulated toxic burden the drug had held back is now released, producing severe rebound eruptions. Patients are told they have “steroid withdrawal syndrome” or that their underlying eczema has worsened, and are placed back on the drug at higher potency.³²

The cost of the suppression is retention of the material the skin was expelling. When Bieler’s bile poisons cannot come out through the skin, they remain in the tissues, migrate to other sites, or overwhelm the primary elimination organs the body was trying to relieve.

7. Fatigue

Fatigue is enforced rest. When the body’s repair burden exceeds its available energy, it reallocates. Muscular activity is limited, cognitive activity is reduced, appetite drops, freeing digestive energy for repair, and the individual is pulled toward sleep. Shelton: complete rest is the greatest therapeutic measure, because slowing the expenditure of energy accelerates the recruiting of energy for restorative work.³³

Christopher Gian-Cursio described the mechanism in the Hygienic Review in 1942. A sick person needs not only sleep sufficient to balance daily expenditure but sleep beyond that, to facilitate curative action. During sleep, and to a lesser degree while resting, the body makes its greatest advances in removing the immediate causes of disease.³⁴

The suppression takes multiple forms. Prescription stimulants including amphetamine salts (Adderall), lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse), methylphenidate (Ritalin, Concerta), and modafinil (Provigil) force wakefulness and activity by pharmacologically overriding the body’s demand for rest. All produce dependence. All produce cardiovascular effects including elevated blood pressure and heart rate. Long-term amphetamine use is associated with cardiomyopathy, stroke, and sudden cardiac death.³⁵

The suppression extends past prescription drugs into industrial-dose caffeine (approximately 300 milligrams daily for the average American, more from energy drinks), nicotine, and the widespread pattern of combining caffeine with analgesics.

Medical culture participates. Patients presenting with unexplained fatigue are frequently tested, imaged, and referred. If no discrete disease is identified, they are told they have chronic fatigue syndrome, given SSRIs, or advised that stress management is the issue. What they are almost never told is what Shelton wrote in 1964: the fatigue is the body’s demand for rest sufficient to complete the repair, and the appropriate response is to grant it.

The cost of the suppression is denial of the repair the fatigue was requesting. The insult that provoked the fatigue continues. The energy that should have gone to repair is instead expended on forced activity. When the individual finally collapses, the accumulated damage has been compounded by months or years of drug-driven overexertion.

8. Appetite Loss

Loss of appetite during illness is not a defect. It is a coordinated instruction. The digestive process requires substantial energy in the form of blood flow to the gut, enzyme production, motility, and hepatic processing, and during illness that energy is required elsewhere. The body reduces demand for it by reducing hunger. Fasting during illness allows resources to be reallocated to repair and elimination.

Cowan set out the metabolic mechanism. The body shifts into a catabolic state after twelve hours without food, breaking down stored fat and mobilizing toxins previously sequestered in tissue. Any impairment involving deposition, whether atherosclerotic plaque, joint calcification, or tissue deposits, is served by regular time in this catabolic state. When illness is present, the body prioritizes the shift, which is why appetite falls at the onset of nearly every acute condition.³⁶

The traditional practice in Natural Hygiene sanatoriums was extended fasting during acute illness. Ulric Williams noted the pattern: hunger returns as the signal that elimination is complete, when the tongue clears and natural hunger emerges.³⁷

The pharmaceutical response has multiple angles. Mirtazapine (Remeron) is an antidepressant with pronounced weight-gain effects, prescribed off-label as an appetite stimulant. Megestrol acetate (Megace) is a synthetic progestogen prescribed for cachexia in cancer and AIDS, with documented risks including thromboembolic events and adrenal suppression. Dronabinol (Marinol) is synthetic THC prescribed for AIDS-associated anorexia. Cyproheptadine (Periactin) is an antihistamine repurposed for pediatric appetite stimulation.

The cultural response is more consequential than any single drug. Hospitalized patients who lose their appetite are pressured to eat, given nutritional supplements such as Ensure and Boost that are high-sugar processed formulations, and progressed to nasogastric or intravenous feeding if resistance continues. The medical logic is that the body cannot heal without nutrition. The terrain logic is that the body cannot heal while digesting.

The cost of the suppression is diversion of resources. The energy the body allocated to repair and elimination is instead consumed by digestion of food it did not want. Elimination stalls. Recovery is prolonged. In the extreme case, a cancer cachexia patient force-fed high-caloric formula while chemotherapy proceeds, the body’s final effort to conserve resources for essential function is chemically overridden, and the patient dies from the intervention rather than the underlying condition.

9. Coughing

Coughing is airway clearing. The cough reflex is a coordinated action of the diaphragm, abdominal muscles, and glottis producing an explosive expulsion of air designed to move material out of the respiratory tract. The material may be mucus containing captured particulates, aspirated food or fluid, inhaled irritants, or debris from damaged tissue. Without the cough reflex, the lungs cannot remain clear.

Shelton was direct about the consequences of interference. If coughing is checked by the depression of the nerves of respiration that follows the taking of certain drugs, the substances in the respiratory tract that the coughing was intended to remove are left there to produce the very harm their removal would have prevented.³⁸ The suppression is not neutral. It leaves the material in the lungs.

The pharmaceutical response is cough suppressants. Dextromethorphan (Robitussin DM, Delsym, NyQuil) acts centrally on the cough center in the medulla. It is the most common over-the-counter cough suppressant and is subject to widespread abuse at high doses for dissociative effects. Codeine and hydrocodone-containing cough syrups suppress the cough reflex by opioid mechanism, producing dependence and respiratory depression. Benzonatate (Tessalon) has caused fatal cardiac arrhythmia in children after accidental ingestion.³⁹

The cost of the suppression is retained material in the airways. The body’s mechanism for clearing the lungs is disabled while the reason for the mechanism, the particulate, the irritant, the mucus load, remains in place. The acute cough that would have cleared the lungs in days becomes chronic, then bronchial, then pneumonic. Pneumonia in hospitalized patients frequently follows cough suppressant administration for what began as acute upper respiratory illness. Postoperative pneumonia is common enough that respiratory therapists are employed specifically to encourage coughing, breathing exercises, and airway clearance, a hospital service that exists because the drugs the hospital administered are known to compromise the mechanism.

10. Swelling

Swelling is fluid mobilization. When tissue is damaged, the body dilates capillaries and increases fluid delivery to the site, producing the visible swelling that is one of the four classical signs of inflammation. When systemic conditions produce fluid retention, whether from cardiac inefficiency, kidney impairment, liver stress, or protein imbalance, the fluid accumulation may represent the body’s response to compromised circulation or accumulated metabolic waste. In each case, the fluid is present because the body directed it there.

Ankle edema in an elderly patient may reflect impaired venous return, dietary sodium excess, cardiac inefficiency, or the toxic burden of accumulated pharmaceutical residues. Joint swelling reflects the inflammatory demolition event described earlier: extra blood volume delivering repair materials to damaged tissue.

The pharmaceutical response is diuretic. Furosemide (Lasix) is a loop diuretic acting on the kidney’s water-reabsorption mechanism, forcing rapid excretion of water and sodium. Its immediate effect is visible. Swelling reduces, urine output increases, weight drops. Its ancillary effects include depletion of potassium, magnesium, and other electrolytes, with cardiac and neuromuscular consequences. Chronic Lasix use damages hearing (ototoxicity) and kidney function.⁴⁰ Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), the thiazide prescribed for hypertension, depletes electrolytes on the same principle; spironolactone spares potassium but disrupts hormone signaling, producing breast development in men and menstrual irregularity in women.

The cost of the suppression is disruption of the body’s fluid regulation. The swelling was the body’s response to a specific condition; the drug removes the fluid without correcting the condition. The underlying insult continues, and electrolyte depletion adds new burdens on cardiac and renal function that were already stressed. Elderly patients on chronic diuretic therapy are among the most drug-burdened cohorts in medicine, with the drug prescribed to counter the visible sign of a condition the drug does not address.

11. Pain

Pain is the body’s most direct communication. The nociceptive system alerts the organism to tissue damage, restricts movement of the injured part to permit repair, and imposes behavioral consequences that discourage further damage. Shelton: pain, redness, swelling, heat and impairment of function are the local response to injury, all due to the excess of blood at the site.⁴¹ Pain is the sensory dimension of inflammation. Without it, the individual would continue damaging the injured tissue.

The mechanism is instruction, not information. Pain enforces the rest and immobilization that permits repair to proceed. A sprained ankle hurts because walking on it would prevent healing; abdominal pain from an intestinal insult enforces the fasting the digestive tract requires; chest pain from cardiac stress halts exertion. Pain is the body giving orders.

The pharmaceutical response is the largest documented catastrophe in modern medicine. Opioids including oxycodone (OxyContin), hydrocodone (Vicodin, Norco), morphine, fentanyl, and tramadol produced over 500,000 overdose deaths in the United States between 1999 and 2019, according to CDC accounting. The Sackler family’s Purdue Pharma marketed OxyContin as non-addictive on the basis of a single misinterpreted paragraph from a 1980 letter to the New England Journal of Medicine, generating over $35 billion in sales and initiating the epidemic that continues at the time of writing.⁴²

NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib) suppress pain by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis, with the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and renal toxicity discussed under inflammation. Acetaminophen suppresses pain by mechanisms including glutathione depletion, with liver toxicity discussed under fever. Gabapentinoids (gabapentin/Neurontin, pregabalin/Lyrica) were originally approved for seizure disorders and were subsequently marketed off-label for chronic pain, generating billions in revenue and a growing catalog of documented harms including sedation, edema, cognitive impairment, and dependence.⁴³

Beyond the drug toxicity, the suppression removes the body’s instruction. A patient with pharmaceutically silenced pain from a damaged joint continues to use it, and a patient with suppressed back pain returns to the activity that provoked the injury. The pain that was designed to enforce healing is chemically silenced, and the underlying condition worsens under the drug’s cover.

Cowan’s inverse approach to arthritis illustrates the alternative. Bee venom stings are administered directly to the inflamed joint, intensifying the inflammation and driving the demolition phase to completion. When the swelling resolves, the joint is better than before the sting.¹³ The pain was the mechanism of repair; permitting it allows the repair to complete, while suppressing it allows the damage to accumulate.

12. Night Sweats

Sweating is skin-based elimination. The skin is the body’s largest organ, and it is bidirectional. It absorbs toxins and it expels them. When elimination through the primary channels of bowel, kidney, and lung is inadequate to the toxic burden, the skin takes up secondary elimination duty. The moisture carries waste out through the sweat glands.

Roytas is direct on the mechanism. Sick people experience fevers and sweat profusely to excrete waste through the skin.¹⁸ Night sweats, the drenching sweat episodes that wake patients with soaked bedding, represent the body’s elimination effort proceeding during rest, when digestive and muscular demands are minimal and the elimination systems can operate at capacity.

Medicine treats night sweats as a workup trigger, testing systematically for cancer (lymphoma), endocrine dysfunction (hyperthyroidism), and the conditions labeled infectious (tuberculosis, HIV, endocarditis), as well as menopause. The differential diagnosis approach misses the shared mechanism. In every case, the body has determined that skin-based elimination is required.

The pharmaceutical response varies by attributed cause. Menopausal night sweats are treated with hormone replacement therapy (estrogen, progestin), SSRIs (paroxetine/Paxil, escitalopram/Lexapro), SNRIs (venlafaxine/Effexor), gabapentin, and clonidine. Hormone replacement therapy was pulled back after the Women’s Health Initiative demonstrated elevated risks of breast cancer, heart disease, stroke, and dementia in long-term users.⁴⁴ SSRI use in perimenopausal women is associated with weight gain, sexual dysfunction, and withdrawal syndromes on discontinuation.

Anticholinergic drugs (oxybutynin, glycopyrrolate) block sweat gland function directly, chemically closing the elimination route. Long-term use carries the same dementia risk demonstrated with first-generation antihistamines.²⁰ Botulinum toxin (Botox), one of the fastest-growing pharmaceutical categories for this indication, is injected into sweat glands to paralyze them for months at a time. The route is disabled rather than closed, but the effect on skin-based elimination is the same.

The cost of the suppression is retention. Waste material the body was expelling through the skin remains in the tissues. Primary elimination systems, already overloaded (which is why the skin was recruited), must attempt to handle the additional burden. The nighttime sweating stops. The toxic burden that provoked it continues to accumulate.


The Cascade

The twelve mechanisms operate simultaneously. In a real patient, an acute illness rarely presents as a single symptom. A respiratory event labeled viral produces fever, mucus, cough, fatigue, and appetite loss in the same person. A gastrointestinal event produces vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, and appetite loss together. An arthritic joint produces pain, swelling, and inflammation as a coordinated package. The body’s response is integrated across systems.

The pharmaceutical response is equally coordinated in the opposite direction. The patient with the respiratory illness receives an antipyretic for the fever, an antihistamine for the mucus, a cough suppressant for the cough, a stimulant or coffee for the fatigue, and pressure to eat despite the appetite loss. Every one of the body’s five simultaneous elimination and repair mechanisms is chemically countered.

The question of how thousands of physicians participate in the pattern without seeing it has an answer in the training. Andrew Kaufman, a psychiatrist who broke ranks with his profession, has documented what medical education actually accomplishes. Students undergo intense shared experiences, information overload, and professional incentive structures that create powerful psychological bonds discouraging critical questioning.⁴⁵ Residents face institutional pressure to prescribe, or to justify why they have not prescribed, so that not prescribing appears as deviant conduct requiring explanation. The physician writing the prescription is not concealing knowledge of what the drug does to the body’s response. He was trained in a system in which the question was never presented.

Richard Pitcairn, after fifty years of veterinary practice, documented the trajectory the suppression produces. A dog presents with a skin problem. Cortisone is prescribed. The skin clears. Weeks or months later, the same dog develops calcification of the spine, pancreatitis, or joint breakdown. A cat presents with an inflamed bladder. The bladder symptoms subside under treatment. Later, the cat presents with kidney failure, diabetes, or hyperthyroidism.⁴⁶ Each new condition is treated as unrelated to the previous one. In the terrain framework and in the pattern Hering described, they are the same disorder driven deeper. The skin was the outermost route the body had. Closing it forced the elimination inward, where it re-expressed itself in a more critical structure.

The veterinary setting removes the objection that muddies human cases. The dog is not aging into unrelated diseases. The cat is not developing new conditions from unrelated lifestyle choices. The animal presents with an acute event, the event is suppressed, and the disorder appears months later in a deeper organ system. Repeat across a fifty-year practice and the pattern is not deniable.

The same trajectory operates in humans. The child with eczema treated with topical steroid develops asthma. The asthmatic treated with inhaled corticosteroids develops the conditions labeled autoimmune. Immunosuppressants are added, and cancer follows. Each stage generates its own diagnosis, its own specialist, its own pharmaceutical stack. The medical record shows a person with many unrelated diseases. The physiological reality is one process, driven deeper at each intervention.

The result is what Shelton described in 1964 and what the establishment now calls chronic disease. The acute event that would have resolved in three to seven days with rest, hydration, warmth, and fasting is pharmacologically extended and complicated. Material that was to be expelled is retained. Repair that was to be completed is interrupted. Energy that was to be allocated to healing is consumed instead by digestion, activity, and the metabolic processing of the drugs administered. The patient does not fully recover.

Six months later, some fraction of the acute events remain, now labeled chronic bronchitis, chronic sinusitis, chronic diarrhea, or fibromyalgia. New drugs are added. The cascade proceeds. By the time the patient is sixty, they are on ten to fifteen daily medications, each addressing a symptom created or perpetuated by the previous drug, and no one has looked at the pattern.

The clinical test Cowan proposed for rheumatology applies across every specialty. Walk into any specialist’s office and ask how many patients they have cured. The word means the condition resolved and the patient walked away with a functioning body and no prescription. Managed, stabilized, or medicated with reduced symptoms is not the same thing.¹³ The answer is zero. It has to be zero, because the treatment model is designed to prevent cure. The body’s efforts are chemically obstructed. The insults that provoked those efforts are never addressed.

What This Means

The twelve symptoms are not the disease. They are the intelligence the body brings to what has damaged it. Fever burns off accumulated waste. Mucus carries irritants out of the airways. Appetite falls because digestion consumes energy the body needs for repair. Fatigue is the body’s demand for rest sufficient to complete that repair. The skin picks up secondary elimination duty when the liver, kidneys, and bowel cannot handle the burden alone. Pain is the instruction that stops movement so healing can proceed.

The pharmaceutical response, applied over decades, produces the population’s disease profile. The chronic conditions that dominate modern medicine (cardiovascular disease, the conditions labeled autoimmune, chronic pain syndromes, chronic respiratory disease, chronic gastrointestinal disease, and the neurodegenerative disorders) all bear the fingerprints of the suppression cycle. The insults that provoked the original acute responses were never removed. The responses were chemically interrupted. Both compounded, for years, for decades. The result fills modern hospitals and pharmacies.

Barbara Starfield, then head of health policy at Johns Hopkins, published an estimate in 2000 that properly prescribed pharmaceuticals cause approximately 106,000 US deaths annually, with total iatrogenic mortality of around 225,000.⁴⁷ That figure placed medical intervention as the third leading cause of death in the country. Later analyses from independent researchers place it higher. The number is not a fringe claim. It is establishment epidemiology, published in JAMA, and it has been broadly ignored in the practice of medicine ever since.

The escape from the pattern begins with recognizing what the twelve responses are for. The body producing them is not failing. It is doing exactly what it should do. The task is to identify what is provoking the response and remove it, then to permit the response to complete. Everything else is delay and damage.

The pharmacy shelf has not changed. The bottles that opened this essay, Tylenol and Advil and Robitussin and the rest, still work the way they always did. They still stop what the body is doing. What has changed is what those bottles look like to a reader who has followed the argument. They are twelve drug classes designed to interrupt twelve mechanisms the body was using to save itself, at costs the labels do not describe.

When Your Body Whispers, Listen: The Intelligence of Symptoms


How To Explain It To A 6 Year Old

Your body is smart. When something is wrong, it does things to try to fix it.

If you eat something bad, your tummy pushes it out, either by vomiting it up or by making poop come out really fast. That’s not the sickness. That’s your body cleaning itself out.

If you catch a cold, you get a fever, your nose runs, and you cough. Your body warms itself up to burn off the bad stuff. Your nose makes goo to catch things and push them out. Your cough clears out your lungs. You don’t want to eat, because your body is busy. You want to sleep a lot, because your body needs the energy for cleaning up.

If you fall down and scrape your knee, the skin turns red and puffy and warm and it hurts. That’s your body sending its repair crew to fix the scrape. The redness is extra blood arriving. The hurt is your body telling you to be careful with that knee while the work gets done.

Every one of these things, the fever, the coughing, the runny nose, the not being hungry, the sleeping, the puffy skin, the hurt, is your body doing its job.

Now imagine a doctor comes and says, “The fever is bad. Take this pill to make the fever go away.” You take the pill. The fever goes away. But the bad stuff your body was trying to burn off is still there, and now your body can’t burn it off because the pill stopped it.

Then the doctor says, “The runny nose is bad. Take this pill to make the runny nose stop.” Now the goo can’t come out either. The bad stuff stays inside.

Then the doctor says, “The cough is bad. Take this syrup to stop the cough.” Now your lungs can’t clear themselves out.

Then the doctor says, “You need to eat. Here is some food.” So your body has to spend energy digesting food when it needed the energy for cleaning up.

After a few months, you feel worse instead of better. You have a chest full of stuff that never got coughed out, a body full of stuff that never got burned off, and a nose full of stuff that never got blown out. So the doctor gives you stronger pills.

The doctor is trying to help. But the doctor has the wrong idea about what your body was doing. Your body wasn’t broken. Your body was fixing itself. The pills stopped the fixing.

The rule is simple. Find out what is making your body sick. Take that thing away. Let your body do what it knows how to do. Give it warm blankets, water, quiet, and time. The body will finish the job by itself.

In Print

Seven of my books are now available as paperbacks, printed to order through Lulu and shipped worldwide. The Unvaccinated lays out the completely unvaccinated as a comparison group across twenty chapters and five appendices — as far as I know, the only book of its kind. Medicalized Motherhood follows a woman through 123 documented interventions from teenage pill to postpartum discharge. Drilling for Profit argues that cavities, gum disease, and crooked teeth are a dietary problem the dental profession treats surgically. What Your Vet Can’t Tell You applies the same critique to pets — food, vaccines, and a profession trained by the industries whose products cause the harm. Escape from Psychiatry documents the fabrication of the DSM, the collapse of the serotonin hypothesis, and the specific damage done by every major psychiatric drug class.

Two more take up what the first five leave out — the remedies the first five explain why you need. The DMSO Book covers 100,000 studies, zero deaths, and one approval — the suppressed science of medicine’s most versatile compound. Chlorine Dioxide: The Forbidden Remedy collects the interviews, protocols, and evidence from the doctors and researchers they tried to silence.

A physical book reaches the person a Substack post never will — the sceptical relative, the friend who won’t click a link but might open a book, the visitor whose eye lands on a coffee table. Buy one to keep, and one to give away.


References

¹ Herbert M. Shelton, “Enervation — Toxemia,” Hygienic Review, Vol. XXV, August 1964, No. 12.

² Herbert M. Shelton, cited throughout Dawn Lester and David Parker, What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong (2019).

³ Constantine Hering, nineteenth-century observations later formalized as “Hering’s Law of Cure.” Discussed in Don Hamilton, Homeopathic Care for Cats and Dogs (North Atlantic Books, 2010).

⁴ H.A. Bernheim and Matthew J. Kluger, “Fever and antipyresis in the lizard Dipsosaurus dorsalis,” American Journal of Physiology 231, no. 1 (1976): 198–203; Matthew J. Kluger, D.H. Ringler, and M.R. Anver, “Fever and survival,” Science 188, no. 4184 (1975): 166–168. See also Kluger, Fever: Its Biology, Evolution, and Function (Princeton University Press, 1979).

⁵ Robert S. Mendelsohn, How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor (Ballantine, 1984), chapter on fever. Also Confessions of a Medical Heretic (Contemporary Books, 1979).

⁶ Thomas Cowan, Cancer and the New Biology of Water (Chelsea Green, 2019).

⁷ William B. Coley, “The Treatment of Malignant Tumors by Repeated Inoculations of Erysipelas,” American Journal of the Medical Sciences 105 (1893): 487-511. Historical documentation compiled in Cowan, Cancer and the New Biology of Water.

⁸ Ulric Williams, compiled in Terrain Therapy (2022), on fever as “Nature’s bonfire.”

⁹ William M. Lee, “Acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity: Isn’t it time for APAP to go away?” Journal of Hepatology 67, no. 6 (2017): 1324-1331. Also documented in Lester and Parker, chapter on pharmaceuticals.

¹⁰ Eugene S. Hurwitz et al., “Public Health Service Study of Reye’s Syndrome and Medications,” JAMA 257, no. 14 (April 10, 1987): 1905-1911. National Reye’s Syndrome Foundation, http://www.reyessyndrome.org.

¹¹ David J. Graham et al., “Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,” The Lancet 365, no. 9458 (2005): 475-481.

¹² Herbert Shelton, Natural Hygiene: Man’s Pristine Way of Life, cited in Lester and Parker.

¹³ Thomas Cowan, Wednesday Webinar, April 15, 2026.

¹⁴ Grand View Research, “Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report, 2024-2030.” Market valued at USD 22.58 billion in 2024.

¹⁵ AbbVie annual reports and compiled Humira revenue data through 2024. Peak year revenue $21.2 billion (2022).

¹⁶ David Graham, testimony before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, November 18, 2004.

¹⁷ Daniel Roytas, Can You Catch a Cold? Untold History and Human Experiments, chapter on respiratory illness and inflammatory mediators.

¹⁸ Roytas, Can You Catch a Cold?, on sweat and skin elimination during febrile illness.

¹⁹ D.C. Jarvis, Folk Medicine: A Doctor’s Guide to Good Health (Pan Books, 1961), chapter titled “Relation of Potassium to Mucus.”

²⁰ Shelly L. Gray et al., “Cumulative Use of Strong Anticholinergics and Incident Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study,” JAMA Internal Medicine 175, no. 3 (2015): 401-407.

²¹ FDA Nonprescription Drug Advisory Committee, September 11-12, 2023 meeting, findings on oral phenylephrine ineffectiveness.

²² Herbert Shelton, on the body’s elimination of ingested poisons via vomiting or diarrhea, cited in Lester and Parker.

²³ Dawn Lester and David Parker, What Really Makes You Ill?, on the WHO framing of diarrheal disease and its terrain interpretation.

²⁴ FDA Drug Safety Communication, “FDA warns about serious heart problems with high doses of the antidiarrheal medicine loperamide (Imodium),” June 7, 2016; updated with dosing restrictions, January 30, 2018.

²⁵ Björn Pasternak et al., “Ondansetron in Pregnancy and Risk of Adverse Fetal Outcomes,” New England Journal of Medicine 368, no. 9 (2013): 814-823. Contradictory findings in Andersen et al., Reproductive Toxicology 43 (2014): 108-116.

²⁶ FDA Public Health Advisory, “Deaths related to intravenous injection of Promethazine (Phenergan) and other narcotic medications,” September 2006. Black-box warning for children under age 2 issued 2004.

²⁷ FDA Safety Alert, black-box warning for metoclopramide (Reglan) and tardive dyskinesia, February 26, 2009.

²⁸ Henry G. Bieler, Food is Your Best Medicine (Random House, 1965), cited in Lester and Parker.

²⁹ John H. Tilden, Impaired Health: Its Cause and Cure, Volume 2, cited in Lester and Parker.

³⁰ CDC/NIOSH, “Skin Exposures and Effects,” http://www.cdc.gov/niosh, accessed via Lester and Parker citation.

³¹ IPCS (WHO/ILO/UNEP), Dermal Absorption (2006) and Dermal Exposure (2014). Environmental Health Criteria series.

³² Marvin J. Rapaport and Marc Rapaport, “Eyelid Dermatitis to Red Face Syndrome to Cure: Clinical Experiences in 100 Cases,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 41 (1999): 435-442. International Topical Steroid Awareness Network (ITSAN), http://www.itsan.org.

³³ Herbert M. Shelton, “The Importance of Rest in Disease,” Hygienic Review Vol. IV, November 1942, No. 3.

³⁴ Christopher Gian-Cursio, “The Importance of Rest in Disease,” Hygienic Review Vol. IV, November 1942, No. 3.

³⁵ FDA product labeling for amphetamine mixed salts (Adderall) and related stimulants. Cardiovascular warnings updated 2007 following FDA Pediatric Advisory Committee review.

³⁶ Thomas Cowan, Human Heart, Cosmic Heart (Chelsea Green, 2016), on intermittent fasting and the catabolic state.

³⁷ Ulric Williams, compiled in Terrain Therapy (2022), on hunger and fasting.

³⁸ Herbert M. Shelton, “Enervation — Toxemia,” Hygienic Review, August 1964, on the consequences of cough and diarrhea suppression.

³⁹ FDA Drug Safety Communication, “Death resulting from overdose after accidental ingestion of Tessalon (benzonatate) by children under 10 years of age,” December 14, 2010.

⁴⁰ Rybak LP, “Ototoxicity of loop diuretics,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 26, no. 5 (October 1993): 829-844. FDA product labeling for furosemide.

⁴¹ Herbert Shelton, on inflammation and the local response to injury, cited in Lester and Parker.

⁴² Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database, opioid overdose mortality 1999-2019. Purdue Pharma marketing history documented in Patrick Radden Keefe, Empire of Pain: The Secret History of the Sackler Dynasty (2021), and U.S. Department of Justice settlement documentation.

⁴³ Christopher W. Goodman and Allan S. Brett, “Gabapentin and Pregabalin for Pain — Is Increased Prescribing a Cause for Concern?” New England Journal of Medicine 377 (2017): 411-414. Parke-Davis whistleblower litigation settled 2004.

⁴⁴ Jacques E. Rossouw et al., “Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial,” JAMA 288, no. 3 (2002): 321-333.

⁴⁵ Andrew Kaufman, MD, recorded interviews and lectures on medical education, psychiatric training, and institutional conditioning within medicine.

⁴⁶ Richard Pitcairn, Dr. Pitcairn’s Complete Guide to Natural Health for Dogs and Cats (Rodale, multiple editions).

⁴⁷ Barbara Starfield, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” JAMA 284, no. 4 (July 26, 2000): 483–485.


Additional Sources

Herbert M. Shelton, Natural Hygiene: Man’s Pristine Way of Life and the Hygienic Review archive John H. Tilden, Toxemia Explained: The True Interpretation of the Cause of Disease Dawn Lester and David Parker, What Really Makes You Ill? Daniel Roytas, Can You Catch a Cold? Untold History and Human Experiments Thomas Cowan, The Contagion Myth, Cancer and the New Biology of Water, Human Heart, Cosmic Heart Ulric Williams compilations, Terrain Therapy (2022) Henry Bieler, Food is Your Best Medicine D.C. Jarvis, Folk Medicine and Arthritis and Folk Medicine Richard Pitcairn, Dr. Pitcairn’s Complete Guide to Natural Health for Dogs and Cats Robert S. Mendelsohn, How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor and Confessions of a Medical Heretic Andrew Kaufman, recorded interviews and lectures on medical education and psychiatric training Matthew J. Kluger, Fever: Its Biology, Evolution, and Function Constantine Hering, on the direction of cure Barbara Starfield, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” JAMA (2000) Carolyn Dean, Death by Modern Medicine Torsten Engelbrecht et al., Virus Mania (3rd edition) Mark Gober et al., An End to Upside Down Medicine Mark Bailey, The Final Pandemic: An Antidote


This essay is educational and represents the author’s paradigm interpretation. Nothing in it constitutes medical advice. Decisions about medication should be made in consultation with a qualified practitioner familiar with the individual’s circumstances.


August 22, 2026 Posted by | Science and Pseudo-Science, Timeless or most popular | Comments Off on The 12 Symptoms Your Body Uses to Save Your Life

The American Academy of Pediatrics Is Back at It Again…

Recommending that all children 6 months and older get the flu vaccine

By Aaron Siri | Injecting Freedom | August 20, 2026

AAP, the trade group, is back at it again with its predictable, self-interested recommendation that all children 6 months and older get a flu vaccine, announcing “flu vaccines have been thoroughly studied…”

What AAP ignores is that a Cochrane Systematic Review of flu vaccine studies concluded it “could find no convincing evidence that [flu] vaccines can reduce mortality, hospital admissions, serious complications, or community transmission of influenza.”

If AAP’s concern was about health, it would read these studies as well as those showing it increases the risk of having a respiratory infection. But we already know that AAP’s true concern is the pecuniary interest of its members.

August 21, 2026 Posted by | Deception, Science and Pseudo-Science | | Comments Off on The American Academy of Pediatrics Is Back at It Again…

AIDS The Unheard Voices

Dispatches, Channel 4, 1987

Reflects differing views on the cause of AIDS.

Winner of Royal Television Society Award
for International Current Affairs, 1988.

August 21, 2026 Posted by | Science and Pseudo-Science, Timeless or most popular, Video | | Comments Off on AIDS The Unheard Voices

Some Shattering Illusions of Our Declining Empire

Americans are waking up to ugly truths

By George D. O’Neill Jr. | The American Conservative | August 19, 2026

Now that the lofty 250th-anniversary rhetoric about the greatness of our country has faded, it is time to face the reality of our country’s actual behavior. The U.S. fashions itself as a generous and benevolent world leader enforcing the “rules-based order”—a deceptive construct used by globalist elites to bully other countries. The rules are arbitrarily changed to suit the bullies and are regularly fashioned into pretexts for military action against uncooperative nations. In short, it is a hoax, untethered from the principles and ideals of our founders.

Almost daily we witness some spectacle illustrating the appalling corruption of our country’s leadership. The recent release of Anthony Fauci’s diary entries confirms long-held suspicions about the Covid-19 narrative, which we now know even Fauci himself did not fully believe. Think of the millions of lives ruined and harmed by that corruption. Yet this vain phony, when asked to testify before Congress, hid behind half a dozen lawyers and refused to answer any questions. What a fine example of transparency from one of our leading scientists and civil servants! What else are our leaders still hiding about the worldwide disaster caused by Covid-related deceptions and manipulations? There has not yet been any meaningful examination of our medical profession, which largely acted as cowards during the pandemic, adhering to the bogus official narrative at the expense of the welfare of their patients.

Our leadership has not even begun to scratch the surface of the horrors created by the many secret—and potentially illegal—biolabs scattered around the globe, supported by funds often hidden from voters under the guise of “national security.” The Fauci crowd appears to have been deeply involved in that dark world.

America’s Middle East policy remains a source of shame. The U.S. Treasury secretary brags about ruining the currency of the Iranian people, against whom we have waged a war of aggression. In Gaza, Washington has enabled a brutal assault on a vulnerable population. Not many years ago, most Americans considered standing up for the vulnerable and innocent an honorable act of a true American. Not our leaders. These days, opposing the harm of politically inconvenient innocents attracts name-calling, ostracism, and sanctions. What would our Founding Fathers have thought of that?

The current wars have exposed the shortcomings of our nearly trillion-dollar military and its multi-billion-dollar weapons systems. If the Covid mess is any indication, we should assume there is hidden and shockingly ugly information about the behavior and practices of the military-industrial complex. The failure of our various expensive defense systems to protect our Persian Gulf “allies” from Iranian missile and drone attacks is a tragic example of government dishonesty. Despite repeated failures, the administration continues to brag of its ability to destroy Iran’s military and shoot down its remaining missiles and drones. After years of being told we possess the “most powerful military” in history, Americans are beginning to realize it is a fantasy. The success of that false narrative rests on decades of fighting people riding donkeys and bicycles.

Our government classifies and redacts documents as a matter of course. Think of the billions of pages we are still not allowed to see—especially information about the most important events in our country’s history. Many significant, history-changing events remain shrouded in secrecy. How is it that information is still being withheld about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy? After six decades, what bad behavior are they still “protecting” from the public? Most Americans suspect the official government narrative was false, yet officials continue to withhold information that might shed light on that crime. The same is true for the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., our government’s willful abandonment of U.S. prisoners of war in Vietnam, the September 11 attacks, and the late, disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Not to mention the disgusting manipulations and secret operations used to drag our country into the long list of dishonest, illegal, and failed wars we have “fought.”

Our political leadership’s frenzied efforts to hide the Epstein files make it look as though the “national security” excuse is merely a convenient tool to obscure malfeasance, rape, blackmail, bribery, and plain old corruption. They clearly believe they are not subject to the same pesky and inconvenient laws as the rest of us who live in the country. So much for equal protection under the law and the “rules-based order.”

We watch with horror the chaos, death, and destruction currently being wreaked on the world—and on our own country—by our “exceptional nation.” Why has the second Trump administration bombed at least seven countries and engaged in underhanded efforts to weaken and harm the political systems of others? None of this serves the interests of the American people; it serves only the special interests of our elites. All this from a president who campaigned on an America First policy, an end to forever wars, and the promotion of peace. It looks like we were fooled again. Presidential candidate after presidential candidate promises peace, and we get war after war. The system is subverted by corruption.

As the failure of the illegal war against Iran becomes increasingly obvious, more Americans are realizing that it in no way serves their interests. As the war against Russia in Ukraine grinds toward failure, American and European leaders continue more frantically than ever to promote the fantasy that Ukraine can defeat Russia in that sad and disastrous conflict.

There is one positive development: The American people, especially the younger generation, are beginning to recognize the corruption at the top of our country and the magnitude of the war lies. They understand that the special interests driving these belligerent policies care nothing about the well-being of the general populace or of our nation. There has always been skepticism toward powerful special interests, but we are moving past skepticism into righteous fury.

This is also true of our “allies,” who watched U.S. elites prioritize Israel over American security when the missiles started flying.

Ours is not an “exceptional nation.” It is not the “shining city on a hill.” It is not “a thousand points of light.” Not anymore. It is a declining empire with a declining military—one unable to protect its allies, yet still seeking to bully and harm any country that angers its corrupt elites.

Our military defenses are so ineffective that Iran—a country one-fourth our size, with an economy smaller than our bloated military budget—can practically name its next round of targets knowing our mighty military can do little to stop them.

With a governing elite that serves foreign and special interests rather than the people and a sweeping surveillance state that stretches from sea to shining sea, Americans are becoming increasingly disillusioned. A sobering question to consider: When the illusion finally shatters, who will be left willing to defend a government that wouldn’t defend its own?


George D. O’Neill, Jr., is a member of the board of directors of the American Ideas Institute, which publishes The American Conservative, and an artist who lives in rural Florida.

August 20, 2026 Posted by | Corruption, Deception, Militarism, Science and Pseudo-Science, Wars for Israel | , | Comments Off on Some Shattering Illusions of Our Declining Empire