Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Canada’s Heritage Minister panel: unregulated speech “erodes the foundations of democracy”

By Dan Frieth | Reclaim The Net | July 11, 2022

According to the Expert Advisory Group on Online Safety appointed by Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, “misleading political communications” should be regulated because unregulated political disinformation and discussion “erodes the foundations of democracy.”

Rodriguez has insisted multiple times that censorship bill, Bill C-11, also known as the Online Streaming Act, would not regulate user-generated content.

“We made it very clear in the Online Streaming Act that this does not apply to what individual Canadians and creators post online,” said Rodriguez. “No users, no online creators will be regulated. Only the companies themselves will have new responsibilities.”

However, that claim has been contradicted by the Canada Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) and the Expert Advisory Group on Online Safety that he appointed. Online platforms would have to regulate based on the speech of its users.

“[Section] 4.2 allows the CRTC to prescribe by regulation user uploaded content subject to very explicit criteria. That is also in the Act,” said chair of CRTC Ian Scott in June 2022.

The same comments have been previously repeated severally by the Expert Advisory Group on Online Safety, whose role is to propose measures of regulating online content that it considers harmful, including, but not limited to “propaganda, false advertising and misleading political communications.”

Content that would be regulated includes Facebook posts, private Twitter DMs, Amazon listings, video games, and even listings on Airbnb.

“Many experts mentioned there is justification to look more widely at some interactive services like Airbnb and gaming platforms,” members of the group proposed in one meeting.

“Many experts supported the notion that private communications should be included under the scope of the legislative framework. Private messaging services should also be regulated.”

The advisory group also proposed the regulation of legal content, noting that legal but harmful content “poses unique challenges” and “it is difficult to reconcile the issue of disinformation with the freedom of expression.”

The Online Streaming Act passed in the House last month and is currently in the Senate.

July 11, 2022 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Full Spectrum Dominance, Progressive Hypocrite | ,

4 Comments »

  1. Regulated speech turns the country into a Communist shithole! The inmates are running the asylum.

    Like

    Comment by papasha408 | July 11, 2022 | Reply

  2. “Expert Advisory Group on Online Safety appointed by Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, “misleading political communications” should be regulated because unregulated political disinformation and discussion “erodes the foundations of democracy.”

    Canada’s Heritage Minister(a Politician) would be an expert on using language to say one thing, and totally mean the opposite. That’s what Politicians do. Politics is the art of saying one thing, and meaning the exact opposite.
    Australia’s recently “booted out” Prime Minister Scott Morrison(who liked to be referred to as “ScoMo”), but that name soon morphed into “Scomoccio” because of his ability to lie, lie a Pig in it’s own sh*t.

    Open honest discussion is, when the dust settles, like a breath of fresh air, and, it should be embraced for it’s cleansing effect.

    Like

    Comment by brianharryaustralia | July 11, 2022 | Reply

  3. Funny, I thought freedom of speech was one of the basics of democracy. Apparently not in Canada.

    Like

    Comment by Bill Francis | July 12, 2022 | Reply

  4. It’s ironic that the men and women we choose to represent us in Parliament, the men and women who live out of our pockets, are the greatest collection of traitors in the country and the biggest threat to freedom and democracy. The Online Streaming Bill in Canada, the Online Safety Bill in the UK, and undoubtedly similar legislation in other Anglo countries, are conclusive evidence of that.

    Like

    Comment by Bill Francis | July 12, 2022 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.