Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Biden to name a US military operation for Ukraine

By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos | Responsible Statecraft | August 26, 2022

Two things that point to the notion that Washington is supporting a long war in Ukraine, and truly doesn’t think there will be a diplomatic solution or cessation of violence there anytime soon: one, the $3 billion in recently announced military transfers is a “multi-year military investment” including weapons that won’t be available via defense contractors for at least three years.

Secondly, a little nugget dropped on us Wednesday night: Biden plans on “naming ” the U.S. military assistance mission in Ukraine and making it a separate command with its own general. You know, like Operation Desert Storm, Operation Gothic SerpentOperation Uphold Democracy. or Operation Unified ProtectorWe can expect the name, when it comes, will be heavy on the righteous benefactor angle, softer on the sword. But it is nevertheless a military operation, and that carries with it some practical, and serious implications. FromWSJ:

The naming of the operation formally recognizes the U.S. effort within the military, akin to how the Pentagon dubbed the missions in Iraq and Afghanistan Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel. The naming of the training and assistance is significant bureaucratically, as it typically entails long-term, dedicated funding and the possibility of special pay, ribbons and awards for service members participating in the effort. The selection of a general, expected to be a two- or three-star, reflects the creation of a command responsible to coordinate the effort, a shift from the largely ad hoc effort to provide training and assistance to the Ukrainians for years.

This does not seem like a formula for bringing the war to a swift end. This seems like an all-too familiar set up for a “long hard slog.” Ukraine may be in the driver’s seat today, but the West, which most certainly includes the hawkish UK foreign policy elite, appears to be more interested in seeing this through as this era’s Soviet-Afghan war, or the U.S. war in Afghanistan itself, which took two decades before Washington finally threw up its hands and walked away.

Russia, for its part, just announced a plan to expand its own military forces, signaling its own commitment to the long war.

Rather than putting energy into getting both sides into a position where they can begin talking about a ceasefire and some sort of negotiated settlement, Washington is naming a new command. If this is not acknowledging a deeper level of U.S. military involvement in this war, what is it? And if so, why shouldn’t the American people be wary?

“This move could signal to other actors in the conflict — particularly the Ukrainian and Russian governments — that the United States is planning on getting significantly more directly involved in the war itself. That of course could lead to the war being prolonged and raise the risk of escalation between the United States, NATO, and a nuclear-armed Russia,” says Dan Caldwell, senior advisor to Concerned Veterans of America.

“Putting a name on an operation is far more significant than merely coming up with a catchy tagline. It confers an intent to provide long term, sustained, and expensive support to one side of a war that we are not fighting,” adds (Ret.) Lt. Col. Daniel Davis, senior fellow and military expert at Defense Priorities. It’s curious, he added, “especially as the United States is suffering its highest inflation in four decades, recently saw record-high gasoline prices, and as many experts warn a recession may hit this winter.”

Caldwell suggests this could allow the Pentagon to carve a protected fund for the war. “Establishing a formal, named-mission or military task-force specifically for Ukraine could further open the door to moving funding for the war in Ukraine to the Overseas Contingency Operations budget, which is essentially the Pentagon’s slush fund. That could be one of the primary motivations here – the Pentagon wants a steady stream of funding from a source that Congress has shown a lack of willingness to properly oversee.”

That concern and for the trajectory overall, should trigger lawmakers’ radars, because whether they want it or not, they bear a role, said Davis.

“If there is to be any long-term and costly diversion of American resources to support someone else’s unwinnable fight, the U.S. Congress must weigh in and the people of our country must have a chance to make their opinions known. But no matter what, it’s not up to the White House and Pentagon alone to decide what this country does and doesn’t support long term.”

August 26, 2022 - Posted by | Militarism | ,

3 Comments »

  1. “Biden to name a US military operation for Ukraine”. Given that Joe Biden has trouble tying his shoe laces every morning, this looks like another Multi Trillion dollar burden that will be placed on the American people, and the last time I looked, the National Debt is well over $30 TRILLION DOLLARS, and heading out past Pluto.
    Maybe the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and the “Woman” in charge of the USA Treasury can explain to the American people, “Who is going to pay for all this LUNACY”?

    The USA is “on the road to Hell”, and no one is responsible for the outcome, least of all “Geriatric Joe”

    Like

    Comment by brianharryaustralia | August 26, 2022 | Reply

  2. Are the Americans still looking for a name? Operation Coup U.

    Although it is understandable that a war takes some time it is of very high importance that a war should be fought swiftly, instead of giving the opponent opportunities. Sometimes it seems as if Russia is begging for this to happen.

    Like

    Comment by Balthasar Gerards | August 26, 2022 | Reply

  3. “Operation Desert Storm, Operation Gothic Serpent, Operation Uphold Democracy. or Operation Unified Protector”. Those names look like they were dreamed up by a “Hollywood” marketing movie producer, to make them sound Bold and Brave and exciting,(and portrayed in the MSM as “Americans, saving the World from EVIL”) whereas, The Military Industrial Complex is doing what the MIC has been doing since WWII, relentlessly killing millions of human beings, around the World, for their “Owners”……(and, going ‘Broke” in the process)!!

    Like

    Comment by brianharryaustralia | August 27, 2022 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.